scholarly journals Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Secondary to Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of the Appendix

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Sparks ◽  
Bradley Morris ◽  
Wen Xu ◽  
Jessica Fulton ◽  
Victoria Atkinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Effective Treatment Option ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Retrospective Clinical Study ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a radical but effective treatment option for select peritoneal malignancies. We sought to determine our early experience with this method for peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to mucinous adenocarcinomas of appendiceal origin. As such, we performed a retrospective clinical study of 30 consecutive patients undergoing CRS with planned HIPEC at the Princess Alexandra Hospital, between June 2009 to December 2012, with mucinous adenocarcinomas of the appendix. CRS was performed in 30 patients, 13 received HIPEC intraoperatively and 17 received early postoperative intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) in addition. Mean age was 52.3 years and median hospital stay was 26 days (range 12–190 days). Peritoneal cancer index scores were 0–10 in 6.7% of patients, 11–20 in 20% of patients and >20 in 73.3% of patients. Complete cytoreduction was achieved overall in 21 patients. In total, 106 complications were observed in 28 patients. Ten were grade 3-A, five were grade 3-B and one grade-5 secondary to a fatal PE on day 97. In patients who received HIPEC, there was no difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.098) or overall survival (P = 0.645) between those who received EPIC versus those who did not. This study demonstrates that satisfactory outcomes with regards to morbidity and survival can be achieved with CRS and HIPEC, at a single-centre institution with growing expertise in the technique. Our results are comparable with outcomes previously described in the international literature.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Initial Experience in Oaxaca, Mexico

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (9) ◽  
pp. 942-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolando GarcÍA-Matus ◽  
Carlos Alberto HernÁNdez-HernÁNdez ◽  
Omar Leyva-GarcÍA ◽  
Sergio Vásquez-Ciriaco ◽  
Guillermo Flores-Ayala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Crs And Hipec

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) has been traditionally considered a terminal disease with median survivals reported in the literature of 6 to 12 months. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are playing an ever increasing role in the treatment of these patients. Excellent results have been achieved in well-selected patients but there is a very steep learning curve when starting a new program. A program for peritoneal surface malignancies in which patients with PC of gastrointestinal or gynecological origin were treated using multi-modality therapy with combinations of systemic therapy, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and HIPEC was initiated in December 2007 at “Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Oaxaca,” Mexico. We present the results of our initial experience. From December 2007 to February 2011, 26 patients were treated with CRS and HIPEC. There were 21 female patients. Most common indication (46%) was recurrent ovarian cancer. Mean duration of surgery was 260 minutes. Mean Peritoneal Cancer Index was 9. Twenty-three (88.5%) patients had a complete cytoreduction. Major morbidity and mortality rates were 19.5 and 3.8 per cent, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 8 days. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, median survival has not been reached. Rigorous preoperative workup, strict selection criteria, and mentoring from an experienced cytoreductive surgeon are mandatory and extremely important when starting a center for PC.

Delay of Cytoreductive Surgery and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Patients with Appendiceal Neoplasm

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (7) ◽  
pp. 745-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hatem El Halabi ◽  
Ryan Macdonald ◽  
Kimberly Studeman ◽  
Jennifer Francis ◽  
Carol Nieroda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Tumor Load ◽  
Prior Surgery

Cytoreductive surgery/heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) has been shown to be effective for selected patients with advanced appendiceal cancer. We propose that delaying CRS/HIPEC leads to disease progression and affects outcome. A retrospective analysis of a prospective database was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups based on time from diagnosis to CRS/HIPEC (less than 6 months = early, greater than 6 months = delayed). Comparison was made of Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), Prior Surgery Score (PSS), complete cytoreduction (CC), and lymph node status. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Of 127 patients, 50 had disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and 77 had peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis (PMCA). Of patients with PMCA, 41 had early CRS/HIPEC and 36 delayed. PCI was less than 20 in 46 and 17 per cent ( P = 0.007) of the early and delayed groups, respectively. CC was achieved in 88 and 61 per cent ( P = 0.009) of the early and delayed groups, respectively. PSS was (2 of 3) in 51 and 91 per cent ( P = 0.001) of the early and delayed groups, respectively. Five-year OS was 54 per cent for the early group and 45 per cent for the delayed group ( P = 0.2). Delaying CRS/HIPEC was associated with higher tumor load and lower chance for complete cytroreduction. Longer follow-up and larger numbers are needed to determine if OS difference will reach statistical significance.

scholarly journals Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: A 20-Year Single-Center Experience

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 523
Author(s):  
Fabio Carboni ◽  
Orietta Federici ◽  
Isabella Sperduti ◽  
Settimio Zazza ◽  
Domenico Sergi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Serous Carcinoma ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Despite improvement in treatments, the peritoneum remains the primary site of relapse in most ovarian cancer cases. Patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis from epithelial ovarian cancer were reviewed. Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariate Cox analyses were used to identify survival rates and prognostic factors. This study included 158 patients. The procedure was mostly performed for recurrent disease (46.8%) and high-grade serous carcinoma (58.2%). The median peritoneal cancer index was 14, and complete cytoreduction was obtained in 87.9% of cases. Grade IV morbidity occurred in 15.2% of patients, mostly requiring surgical reoperation, and one patient (0.6%) died within 90 days. The median follow-up was 63.5 months. The Kaplan–Meier 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 42.1% and 24.3%, respectively. Multiple regression logistic analyses demonstrated that the completeness of cytoreduction (CC) score (p ≤ 0.0001), pancreatic resection (p ≤ 0.0001) and number of resections (p = 0.001) were significant factors influencing OS; whereas the CC score (p ≤ 0.0001) and diaphragmatic procedures (p = 0.01) were significant for DFS. The addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy to standard multimodality therapy may improve outcomes in both primary and recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer without impairing early postoperative results, but the exact timing has not yet been established. Prospective randomized studies will clarify the role and indications of this approach.

scholarly journals Cytoreductive Surgery Combined with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (06) ◽  
pp. 372-376
Author(s):  
Hideaki Yano
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Peritoneal Metastasis ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Good Reason ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer

AbstractPeritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer (PM-CRC) is used to be considered a systemic and fatal condition; however, it has been growingly accepted that PM-CRC can still be local disease rather than systemic disease as analogous to liver or lung metastasis.Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is now considered an optimal treatment for PM-CRC with accumulating evidence. There is a good reason that CRS + HIPEC, widely accepted as a standard of care for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), could be a viable option for PM-CRC given a similarity between PM-CRC and PMP.Recent years have also seen that modern systemic chemotherapy with or without molecular targeted agents can be effective for PM-CRC. It is possible that neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy combined with CRS + HIPEC could further improve outcomes.Patient selection, utilizing modern images and increasingly laparoscopy, is crucial. Particularly, diagnostic laparoscopy is likely to play a significant role in predicting the likelihood of achieving complete cytoreduction and assessing the peritoneal cancer index score.

scholarly journals Hemodynamic Monitoring During Heated Intraoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Using the FloTrac/Vigileo System

2015 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 1033-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Mavroudis ◽  
Leonidas Alevizos ◽  
Konstantinos M. Stamou ◽  
Theodosia Vogiatzaki ◽  
Savvas Eleftheriadis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Continuous Increase ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC has provided a chance for long-term survival in selected patients. However, perioperative management remains a challenge for the anesthesiology team. The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in hemodynamic parameters during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) using the FloTrac/Vigileo system. Forty-one consecutive patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC were enrolled. Heart rate (HR), esophageal temperature, and cardiac output (CO) steadily increased until the end of HIPEC. In the first half of HIPEC, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and central venous pressure (CVP) increased whereas systemic vascular resistance (SVR) decreased; SVR stabilized in the second half. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and stroke volume (SV) showed no significant variation. Male gender was related to increased CVP, CO, and SV, and decreased SVR; age >55 years was related to increased SBP, and peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was correlated with HR, DBP, and SV. PCI >14 was associated with increased HR and decreased DBP and MAP. American Society of Anesthesiologists score >1 was related to decreased CO and SV. Patients undergoing HIPEC develop a hyperdynamic circulatory state because of the increased temperature, characterized by a steady decrease in SVR and continuous increase in HR and CO. FloTrac/Vigileo system may provide an easy-to-handle, noninvasive monitoring tool.

Circulating tumor DNA as a prognostic factor in peritoneal carcinomatosis after hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16280-e16280
Author(s):  
Zongyuan Li ◽  
Xiaolin Pu ◽  
Hua Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Tumor Markers ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Plasma Samples ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Tumor Dna

e16280 Background: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is the main treatment for peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC).However, It is still a major problem to predict the efficacy of HIPEC. Some studies have shown that peritoneal cancer index (PCI) can be used to predict the efficacy of HIPEC, but the invasiveness and inaccuracy are shortcomings. Therefore, we need a minimally invasive and accurate prediction biomarker. Many studies have confirmed that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can accurately predict the efficacy and prognosis of various solid tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of ctDNA from ascites and plasma for HIPEC. Methods: Eligible PC patients should be defintive diagnosed by pathology or cytology. Each patient was treated with HIPEC for 4 times, with an interval of 3 days each time. Plasma and ascites samples were collected before HIPEC and after the last HIPEC. All samples were detected by next generation sequencing (NGS). The molecular tumor burden index (mTBI) and main clone variant allele fraction (VAF) changes were used as the prediction indexes of efficacy. In addition, The changes of common tumor markers such as CEA during the same period were used as controls. Results: A total of 19 patients with PC were enrolled from November 2018 to January 2020. Firstly, the mTBI changes of 14 patients whom had plasma samples at two time points (baseline and postHIPEC)were analyzed. Among them, 3 patients had no gene mutation were detected in two time points. There were significant differences in mTBI before and after HIPEC in the remaining 11 patients (Wilcoxon， p = 0.026). the median Ascites progression free survival (PFS) was 3.35 months (95% CI: 2.34 – 5.13 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 5.93 months (95% CI: 4.93 – 11.17 months). The mTBI decline was significantly positively correlated with ascites PFS (Spearman r = 0.673, p = 0.023) and moderately positively correlated with OS (Spearman r = 0.510, p = 0.109). The highest VAF in plasma samples was defined as the main clone mutation. The main clone VAF decline was moderately positively correlated with ascites PFS (Spearman r = 0.588, p = 0.057) and slightly positively correlated with OS (Spearman r = 0.386, p = 0.241). As the controls, We found that the common tumor markers decline was no correlated with ascites PFS(Spearman r = 0.091, p = 0.790) and OS (Spearman r = 0.287, p = 0.396). We further analyzed the correlation of VAF between ascites and plasma co-mutation genes in 12 patients. The VAF of co-mutated genes in plasma and ascites was positively correlated (Spearman r = 0.794, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Plasma ctDNA can be used as a biomarker for predicting the efficacy of HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis, and its accuracy is significantly higher than comon tumor markers. However, a larger sample size study are needed to validate our results.

Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastases (CYTO-CHIP study): A Propensity Score Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (23) ◽  
pp. 2028-2040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Emmanuel Bonnot ◽  
Guillaume Piessen ◽  
Vahan Kepenekian ◽  
Evelyne Decullier ◽  
Marc Pocard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index ◽  
Peritoneal Metastases ◽  
Recurrence Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer

PURPOSE Gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal metastases (PMs) is a poor prognostic evolution. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) yields promising results, but the impact of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains controversial. Here we aimed to compare outcomes between CRS-HIPEC versus CRS alone (CRSa) among patients with PMs from GC. PATIENTS AND METHODS From prospective databases, we identified 277 patients with PMs from GC who were treated with complete CRS with curative intent (no residual nodules > 2.5 mm) at 19 French centers from 1989 to 2014. Of these patients, 180 underwent CRS-HIPEC and 97 CRSa. Tumor burden was assessed using the peritoneal cancer index. A Cox proportional hazards regression model with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity score was used to assess the effect of HIPEC and account for confounding factors. RESULTS After IPTW adjustment, the groups were similar, except that median peritoneal cancer index remained higher in the CRS-HIPEC group (6 v 2; P = .003). CRS-HIPEC improved overall survival (OS) in both crude and IPTW models. Upon IPTW analysis, in CRS-HIPEC and CRSa groups, median OS was 18.8 versus 12.1 months, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 26.21% and 19.87% versus 10.82% and 6.43% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.86; P = .005), and 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 20.40% and 17.05% versus 5.87% and 3.76% ( P = .001), respectively; the groups did not differ regarding 90-day mortality (7.4% v 10.1%, respectively; P = .820) or major complication rate (53.7% v 55.3%, respectively; P = .496). CONCLUSION Compared with CRSa, CRS-HIPEC improved OS and recurrence-free survival, without additional morbidity or mortality. When complete CRS is possible, CRS-HIPEC may be considered a valuable therapy for strictly selected patients with limited PMs from GC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document