Peripheral Nerve Lesions Secondary to Varicose Vein Surgery of the Lower Extremity: Review of the Literature

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 276-284
Author(s):  
HÜSEYİN İLKER İPEKDAL
Neurosurgery ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 750-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Kuntz ◽  
Lindsey Blake ◽  
Gavin Britz ◽  
Aaron Filler ◽  
Cecil E. Hayes ◽  
...  

Phlebologie ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (06) ◽  
pp. 287-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.-M. Baier ◽  
Z. T. Miszczak

Summary Background: Platelet function inhibitors (PFI) are used for prophylaxis of atherothrombosis. These drugs cause a prolongation of the bleeding time and should eventually be stopped before an elective operation. However, there is a risk that a perioperative pause of PFI lead to acute atherothrombosis. Objective: Our aim was to study whether a discontinuation of PFI therapy is necessary to avoid bleeding complications in patients undergoing varicose vein surgery. Methods: Selective review of the literature and retrospective analysis of clinical data of our own patients. Results: In the years 2002 to 2007 a total of 10 827 patients have been operated on varicose veins, 673 (6.2%) of these aged 32–86 years (67 ± 7.9) receiving permanent PFI therapy: 256 male patients (38.0%) and 417 female (62.0%), 39.1% categorized as ASA III patients: male 11.6%, female 27.5%. 38 patients who continued PFI therapy did not demonstrate haemorrhagic complications and none of those pausing anti-platelet medication experienced thromboembolic complications. The literature survey confirmed our finding that it is not necessary to suspend PFI medication for varicose vein surgery as the bleeding risk can be controlled for by technical means. Conclusion: Discontinuation of PFI therapy prior to interventions on varicose veins does not seem to be necessary, further studies are essential though.


1999 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidefumi Furuoka ◽  
Mituru Hasegawa ◽  
Yoshiyasu Kobayashi ◽  
Takane Matsui

1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Murray ◽  
Shwun-De Wang ◽  
Michael E. Goldberger ◽  
Pat Levitt

1988 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-41
Author(s):  
Linda M. Fahr ◽  
Donald D. Sauser

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Neil Simmons ◽  
David A. Lisle ◽  
James M. Linklater

Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Heinen ◽  
Patrick Dömer ◽  
Thomas Schmidt ◽  
Bettina Kewitz ◽  
Ulrike Janssen-Bienhold ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Clinical and electrophysiological assessments prevail in evaluation of traumatic nerve lesions and their regeneration following nerve surgery in humans. Recently, high-resolution neurosonography (HRNS) and magnetic resonance neurography have gained significant importance in peripheral nerve imaging. The use of the grey-scale-based “fascicular ratio” (FR) was established using both modalities allowing for quantitative assessment. OBJECTIVE To find out whether FR using HRNS can assess nerve trauma and structural reorganization in correlation to postoperative clinical development. METHODS Retrospectively, 16 patients with operated traumatic peripheral nerve lesions were included. The control group consisted of 6 healthy volunteers. All imaging was performed with a 15 to 6 MHz ultrasound probe (SonoSite X-Porte; Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). FR was calculated using Fiji (兠) on 8-bit-images (“MaxEntropy” using “Auto-Threshold” plug-in). RESULTS Thirteen of 16 patients required autologous nerve grafting and 3 of 16 extra-intraneural neurolysis. There was no statistical difference between the FR of nonaffected patients’ nerve portion with 43.48% and controls with FR 48.12%. The neuromatous nerve portion in grafted patients differed significantly with 85.05%. Postoperatively, FR values returned to normal with a mean of 39.33%. In the neurolyzed patients, FR in the affected portion was 78.54%. After neurolysis, FR returned to healthy values (50.79%). Ten of 16 patients showed clinical reinnervation. CONCLUSION To our best knowledge, this is the first description of FR using HRNS for quantitative assessment of nerve damage and postoperative structural reorganization. Our results show a significant difference in healthy vs lesioned nerves and a change in recovering nerve portions towards a more “physiological” ratio. Further evaluation in larger patient groups is required.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document