scholarly journals RESILIÊNCIA INSTITUCIONAL: para onde vai a participação nos Conselhos Nacionais de Saúde e dos Direitos da Mulher?

Caderno CRH ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 020004
Author(s):  
Debora Rezende de Almeida
Keyword(s):  
Women's Rights ◽  
Participant Observation ◽  
The State ◽  
Women’S Rights ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Prise De Décision ◽  
Participatory Institutions ◽  
Changement Institutionnel ◽  
Société Civile ◽  
Institutional Participation

<p>O presente artigo se propõe a compreender as mudanças na participação política que afetaram a relação entre Estado e sociedade civil nos processos decisórios de políticas públicas desde o impeachment presidencial de 2016 no Brasil. Para isso, o artigo propõe o conceito de resiliência institucional, a partir da combinação de quatro literaturas: estudos sobre resiliência, mudança institucional, participação institucional e repertórios de ação coletiva e interação entre Estado e movimentos sociais. Aponta ainda quais seriam os fatores que contribuem para a resiliência de algumas instituições participativas. O trabalho é baseado em estudo de caso dos Conselhos Nacionais de Saúde e Direitos da Mulher, e no uso de técnicas de pesquisa qualitativas, a saber, entrevistas semiestruturadas, observação participante e análise documental, examinando as mudanças nas estratégias e repertórios de interação com o Estado, internamente e para além dos Conselhos, e levantando questões sobre o futuro da participação institucional no país.</p><p> </p><p>INSTITUTIONAL RESILIENCE: WHERE DOES PARTICIPATION GO IN THE NATIONAL COUNCILS OF HEALTH AND WOMENS’S RIGHTS?</p><p>This article aims to understand the changes in political participation that have affected the relationship between the State and civil society in the public policies decision-making since the 2016 presidential impeachment in Brazil. For this, the article proposes the concept of institutional resilience, based on the combination of four types of literatures: studies dealing with resilience, institutional change, institutional participation and repertoires of collective action and interaction between state and social movements. Furthermore, it points out what are the factors that contribute to the resilience of some participatory institutions, based on the case study of the National Councils of Health and Women’s Rights, and the use of qualitative research techniques, namely, semi-structured interviews, participant observation and content analysis, examining the changes in strategies and repertoires of interaction with the State, inside and beyond the councils, and raising questions about the future of institutional participation in the country.</p><p>Keywords: Intitucional resilience, Institutional participation, National councils, Health, Women’s rights.</p><p> </p><p>RÉSILIENCE INSTITUTIONNELLE : OÙ VA LA PARTICIPATION DANS LES CONSEILS NATIONAUX DE LA SANTÉ ET DES DROITS DES FEMMES?</p><p>Cet article vise à comprendre les changements dans la participation politique qui ont influencié la relation entre l’État et la société civile dans la prise de décision des politiques publiques depuis la destitution présidentielle de 2016 au Brésil. À cette effect, l’article propose le concept de résilience institutionnelle, basé sur la combinaison de quatre objets littéraires: les études sur la résilience, le changement institutionnel, la participation institutionnelle et les répertoires d’action collective et d’interaction entre l’État et les mouvements sociaux. L’article souligne également quels sont les facteurs qui contribuent à la résilience de certaines institutions participatives, basé sur l’étude de cas des conseils nationaux pour la santé et les droits des femmes, et l’utilisation de techniques de recherche qualitative, à savoir, entretiens semi-structurés, l’observation participante et des données secondaires, examinant les changements des stratégies et des répertoires d’interaction avec l’État au sein et au-delà des conseils, et posant des questions sur l’avenir de la participation institutionnelle au Brésil.</p><p>Mots clés: Résilience institutionnelle, Participation institutionnelle, Conseils nationaux, Santé, Droits des femmes.</p>

Family values? Sexism and heteronormativity in Feminist Evolutionary Analytic (FEA) research

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen M. Kinsella ◽  
Laura Sjoberg
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Women's Rights ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Family Values ◽  
The State ◽  
Security Studies ◽  
Women’S Rights ◽  
Male Violence ◽  
Security Research ◽  
Sex And Sexuality

AbstractIn this article, we focus on the subset of evolutionary theorising self-identified as Feminist Evolutionary Analytic (FEA) within security studies and International Relations. We offer this accounting in four sections. First, we provide a brief overview of the argument that reproductive interests are the ‘origins’ of international violence. Second, we break down the definitions of gender, sex, and sexuality used in evolutionary work in security studies generally and in FEA specifically, demonstrating a lack of complexity in FEA’s accounts of the potential relations among the three and critiquing their essentialist heteronormative assumptions. Third, we argue that FEA’s failure to reflect on the history and context of evolutionary theorising, much less contemporary feminist critiques, facilitates its forwarding of the state and institutions as primarily neutral and corrective bulwarks against male violence. Fourth, we conclude by outlining what is at stake if we fail to correct for this direction in feminist, IR, and security research. We argue that FEA work misrepresents and narrows the potential for understanding and responding to violence, facilitating the continued instrumentalisation of women’s rights, increased government regulation of sexuality, and a more expansive form of militarism.

scholarly journals Protecting Women’s Rights And Freedoms In Uzbekistan

2021 ◽  
Vol 03 (04) ◽  
pp. 353-358
Author(s):  
Marguba Makhsudovna Nosirova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Women's Rights ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
The State ◽  
Women’S Rights ◽  
Gender Policy ◽  
Participation Of Women ◽  
The World ◽  
State Programs

This article deals with the situation with violations of women's rights and freedoms in the world in recent years and the increase in violence against them during the COVID-19 pandemic, measures taken in our country on gender policy, a number of presidential decrees. The large-scale work on increasing the participation of women in society and the state, based on the tasks set out in the state programs and responded also was analyzed.

“We’re Not Equipped”: The Paradox of Intersectional Failures in the Formation of Men’s Gender Justice Groups

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tal Peretz
Keyword(s):  
Social Movement ◽  
Women's Rights ◽  
Participant Observation ◽  
Interview Study ◽  
Women’S Rights ◽  
Gender Justice ◽  
Marginalized Communities ◽  
Men's Groups ◽  
Men’S Involvement

Men’s involvement in the antiviolence and women’s rights movements has increased in recent decades, but men’s groups still struggle to recognize difference among men. This study is based on a year-long participant observation and interview study with two gender justice groups directed toward men of marginalized communities. A third group, Men Stopping Violence (MSV), played a paradoxical role that elucidates some dynamics and difficulties of intersectional organizing: MSV’s training and resources were crucial for both groups, but MSV’s failure to organize intersectionally was as important in their formation. From these examples, I theorize three categories of ways that mainstream organizations fall short of intersectional inclusion—organizational elements that are culturally unacceptable to marginalized communities, necessary elements that are absent, and environmental comfort—and make suggestions for intersectional social movement praxis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document