A Rational Factor for Overjet in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion – Growth Pattern or Bolton’s Discrepancy”

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the mean collum angle of maxillary central incisor and to compare it between high angle and low angle patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted using lateral cephalometric radiographs of 61 class II division 1 patients (comprised 32 males, 29 females, age range 13 to 30 years) from the record files of patients inducted for Orthodontic management from June 2020 till August 2020 at the Department of Orthodontics, Sindh Institute of Oral Health Science, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan. The sample was divided on the basis of Vertical Analysis (angulation of mandibular plane) into high and low angle cases. Collum angle was measured using the angulation of the Maxillary Central Incisor (MCI). Student t-test was used to compare the mean difference of the collum angle between skeletal vertical malocclusions. RESULTS: Mean value of the collum angle for high angle (Vertical Growth pattern) cases were mean ± standard deviation (4.35°±1.49°) while for low angle groups (Horizontal Growth pattern) were (2.41°±1.60°). CONCLUSION: There Collum angle of permanent maxillary central incisors differ significantly (p<0.001) among high angle and Low angle malocclusions cases (n=61) and showed pronounced axial bending in Class II division 1 incisors with high angle (4.35° ± 1.49°) as compared to low angle malocclusion (2.41° ± 1.60°). KEYWORDS: Collum Angle, Maxillary Central Incisor, Orthodontic Treatment, High Angle, Low Angle.

Download Full-text

Perbedaan Analisis Sefalometri Skeletal Sebelum dan Sesudah Perawatan Alat Myofunctional pada Pasien Maloklusi Dentoskeletal Kelas II Divisi I dalam Masa Pertumbuhan dengan Metode Steiner

Majalah Sainstekes ◽

10.33476/ms.v4i2.906 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 4 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Nugroho Ahmad Riyadi

Keyword(s):

Orthodontic Treatment ◽

Class Ii ◽

T Test ◽

Analytic Study ◽

Statistic Analysis ◽

Twin Block ◽

Normal Occlusion ◽

Division 1 ◽

Before And After ◽

Class Ii Division 1

The aim of orthodontics treatment is normalization of teeth position in three planes, using various orthodontics appliance to reach the chepalometric standar and normal occlusion. Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients using myofunctional appliance may correct anteroposterior planes of mandibula. This study was a descriptive retrospective analytic study to look at the success of Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 in growing patients with myofunctional appliance using chepalometrics analysis Steiner value. The sample used in this study is chepalogram radiographic from patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients before and after using myofunctional appliance in PPDGS orthodontics Clinic of Padjadjaran University. Statistic analysis were performed with pair t-test and Wilcoxon. Based on this study, it is concluded that orthodontic treatment with myofunctional appliance such as activator and twin block in growing patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion shows significant changes and compatibility with the normal criteria.

Download Full-text

Treatment of Class II Division 1 with Impacted Mandibular Right Second Molar Using Microimplant

Clinical Journal of Korean Association of Orthodontists ◽

10.33777/cjkao.2019.9.4.238 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (4) ◽

pp. 238-248

Author(s):

Sun-mi Lee ◽

Seong-Ryeol Bae ◽

Hee-Moon Kyung ◽

Mi-hee Hong ◽

Hyo-Sang Park

Keyword(s):

Class Ii ◽

Second Molar ◽

Division 1 ◽

Class Ii Division 1

Download Full-text

POSSIBILITY OF APPLICATION OF TADS IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH DISTAL OCCLUSION CLASS II DIVISION 1 BY ANGLO, COMPLICATED BY THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SECOND MOLAR OF THE UPPER JAW

The Journal of scientific articles Health and Education millennium ◽

10.26787/nydha-2226-7425-2018-20-1-15-19 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

pp. 15-19

Author(s):

A.A. Dikova ◽

◽

G.V. Stepanov ◽

L.G. Ulyanova ◽

M.A. Postnikov ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Class Ii ◽

Second Molar ◽

Division 1 ◽

Upper Jaw ◽

Distal Occlusion ◽

Class Ii Division 1

Download Full-text

Comparative Dentoskeletal Study of Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2 Malocclusion Subjects

Orthodontic Journal of Nepal ◽

10.3126/ojn.v1i1.9365 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 1 (1) ◽

pp. 36-41

Author(s):

Jyoti Dhakal

Keyword(s):

Class Ii ◽

Class Ii Malocclusion ◽

Basic Difference ◽

Cephalometric Radiograph ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Division 1 ◽

Dentoskeletal Morphology ◽

Division 2 ◽

Dental Cast ◽

Class Ii Division 1

The dentoskeletal characteristics of Class II malocclusion subjects were evaluated using cephalometric radiograph and dental cast of 60 untreated patients. The sample included 30 Class II Division 1 and 30 Class II Division 2 malocclusion patients. The inter-canine, inter-premolar, inter-molar, inter-canine alveolar, inter-premolar alveolar, inter-molar alveolar widths are measured on study models. The result showed statistically significant difference between the groups for mandibular inter-canine width only. The cephalometric analysis revealed that SNB angle was responsible for the skeletal sagittal difference between the two groups except for the position of maxillary incisors. No basic difference in dentoskeletal morphology existed between Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2 malocclusions.

Download Full-text

Comparative Evaluation of Adenoids, Upper Airway, and Tongue Using “Predictors of Difficult Airways” in Class II Division 1 and Division 2 Cases with Class I Cases: Prospective In Vivo Observational Study

The Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society ◽

10.1177/0301574220963411 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 030157422096341

Author(s):

Smita Mangesh Choudhari ◽

Sunita Shrivastav

Keyword(s):

Significant Positive Correlation ◽

Upper Airway ◽

Class Ii ◽

Class I ◽

Positive Correlation ◽

Division 1 ◽

Difficult Airways ◽

Mandibular Protrusion ◽

Division 2 ◽

Class Ii Division 1

Introduction: Altered nasorespiratory function leads to altered craniofacial growth. Thus, airway evaluation is important for preventive, interceptive, and corrective orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare adenoids, the upper airway, the tongue, and mandibular dimensions using “predictors of difficult airways” in class II division 1 and class II division 2 cases with class I cases. Method: Sixty subjects of age 15 to 18 years were divided into 3 groups (group 1: class I cases; group 2: class II division 1 cases; and group 3: class II division 2 cases) based on cephalometric parameters, with 20 cases in each group. Cephalometric evaluation of adenoids and the nasopharyngeal airway was done using the Handelman–Osborne area method. Upper and lower airway evaluation was done using McNamara’s linear method. “Predictors of difficult airways” were used for evaluation of the airway, which included nasal competency, the Mallampati scale, mandibular length, mandibular protrusion, and the thyromental distance. Results: The present study found a significant positive correlation between the grades of nasal competency and percentage adenoid wall area, and a significant negative correlation between the grades of nasal competency and the upper airway. There was a significant positive correlation between the grades of nasal competency and mandibular length, and a significant positive correlation between the grades of mandibular protrusion and mandibular length. There was a significant positive correlation between the grades of the thyromental distance and mandibular length. Conclusion: It was concluded that the “predictors of difficult airways” would be helpful in early diagnosis and identification of potential risk factors that may cause “breathing disorders”–related malocclusions and later on increase the risk of developing OSA.

Download Full-text