host quality
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

109
(FIVE YEARS 11)

H-INDEX

26
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Oikos ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerardo Fracasso ◽  
Erik Matthysen ◽  
Dieter Heylen

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1-None
Author(s):  
Kévin Tougeron ◽  
Jacques Brodeur ◽  
Joan van Baaren ◽  
David Renault ◽  
Cécile Le Lann

2021 ◽  
Vol 288 (1949) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Freund ◽  
Marie Vasse ◽  
Gregory J. Velicer

Evolutionary diversification can occur in allopatry or sympatry, can be driven by selection or unselected, and can be phenotypically manifested immediately or remain latent until manifested in a newly encountered environment. Diversification of host–parasite interactions is frequently studied in the context of intrinsically selective coevolution, but the potential for host–parasite interaction phenotypes to diversify latently during parasite-blind host evolution is rarely considered. Here, we use a social bacterium experimentally adapted to several environments in the absence of phage to analyse allopatric diversification of host quality—the degree to which a host population supports a viral epidemic. Phage-blind evolution reduced host quality overall, with some bacteria becoming completely resistant to growth suppression by phage. Selective-environment differences generated only mild divergence in host quality. However, selective environments nonetheless played a major role in shaping evolution by determining the degree of stochastic diversification among replicate populations within treatments. Ancestral motility genotype was also found to strongly shape patterns of latent host-quality evolution and diversification. These outcomes show that (i) adaptive landscapes can differ in how they constrain stochastic diversification of a latent phenotype and (ii) major effects of selection on biological diversification can be missed by focusing on trait means. Collectively, our findings suggest that latent-phenotype evolution should inform host–parasite evolution theory and that diversification should be conceived broadly to include latent phenotypes.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Freund ◽  
Marie Vasse ◽  
Gregory J. Velicer

Evolutionary diversification can occur in allopatry or sympatry, can be unselected or driven by selection, and can be phenotypically manifested immediately or remain phenotypically latent until later manifestation in a newly encountered environment. Diversification of host-parasite interactions is frequently studied in the context of intrinsically selective coevolution, but the potential for host-parasite interaction phenotypes to diversify latently during parasite-blind evolution is rarely considered. Here we use a social bacterium experimentally adapted to several environments in the absence of phage to analyse allopatric diversification of latent host quality - the degree to which a host population supports a viral epidemic. Phage-blind evolution reduced host quality overall, with some bacteria becoming completely resistant to growth suppression by phage. Selective-environment differences generated only mild divergence in host-quality. However, selective environments nonetheless played a major role in shaping evolution by determining the degree of stochastic diversification among replicate populations within treatments. Ancestral motility genotype was also found to strongly shape patterns of latent hostquality evolution and diversification. These outcomes show that adaptive landscapes can differ in how they constrain stochastic diversification of a latent phenotype and that major effects of selection on biological diversification can be missed by focusing on trait means. Collectively, our findings suggest that latent-phenotype evolution (LPE) should inform host-parasite evolution theory and that diversification should be conceived broadly to include latent phenotypes.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin R. Morrison ◽  
Robert M. Plowes ◽  
Nathan T. Jones ◽  
Lawrence E. Gilbert

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 240-244
Author(s):  
K. Boudjemaa ◽  
I. Karaca ◽  
M. Biche

The size of California red scale Aonidiella aurantii (Maskell, 1879) (Homoptera: Diaspididae) is the most reliable indicator in terms of host quality for Aphytis melinus (DeBach, 1959) (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) as well as for the efficiency of its biological control. Our study consisted in comparing the cover and body size of each scale developmental stage belonging to two different populations: one from Algeria and the other one from Turkey. The two scale populations were taken from lemon trees during 3 months. We compared measurements between the two localities and also between the plant organs. The larger individuals were those from Algeria. The same results were confirmed through the plant substrate on which scale was fixed: this size variation observed is mainly explained by climatic variations between the two countries and its repercussions on phenology and metabolism of the host plant. In addition, a higher parasitism rate was noticed in the Algerian scale population compared to that of Turkey.


2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 745-757
Author(s):  
M V Sampaio ◽  
G M Franco ◽  
D T Lima ◽  
A R C Oliveira ◽  
P F Silva ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 161 (4) ◽  
pp. 977-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Radka Valterová ◽  
Petr Procházka ◽  
Milica Požgayová ◽  
Radka Piálková ◽  
Lubomír Piálek ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sydne Guevara-Rozo ◽  
Gail Classens ◽  
Altaf Hussain ◽  
Nadir Erbilgin

Studies with conifer-infesting bark beetles commonly use bolts cut from trees to evaluate the effects of host tree quality on various aspects of insect biology. Yet, whether host quality changes between live trees and bolts cut from these trees has not been assessed. Particularly, changes in concentrations of defense chemicals (such as monoterpenes) and nutrients (such as nitrogen and carbon) have not been compared between live trees and their cut bolts. To determine whether monoterpene and nutrient concentrations differ after cutting, jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) trees in Lac La Biche (Alberta) were selected and sampled for phloem tissue. Then, these trees were harvested into two bolts per tree and stored at 4 °C for 3 and 6 months. Phloem was sampled from both live trees and bolts 3 and 6 months after storage. We found that major monoterpenes of jack pine were higher in phloem from bolts than from live trees. Storage time did not affect the results. Furthermore, some nutrients including nitrogen were also higher in bolts and varied between storage times. We conclude that researchers should be aware of the observed changes in the host quality that may have positive or negative effects on the development and behavior of bark beetles under observation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document