447 Left ventricular non-compaction with coronary artery anomaly: incidental diagnosis after ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is a rare congenital cardiomyopathy thought to be caused by arrest of normal endomyocardial morphogenesis. A 33-year-old male, smoker, dyslipidemic not on medical therapy, with family history for sudden cardiac death (SCD) presented to the ER for chest pain radiated to the left arm, unrelated to exertion. The physical examination was within normal limits. Blood tests showed increased cardiac enzymes levels (Troponin I hs 49 308.7 ng/l). The EKG showed STE in the anterior leads and diffuse ventricular repolarization anomalies, suggestive of anterior STEMI. The patient underwent coronary catheterization, with evidence of anomalous origin of the Cx from the RCA and critical stenosis on the proximal LAD, treated with PPCI and implantation of a DES with good angiographic result. The patient was transferred to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. TTE showed moderate LV dilatation, severe LV dysfunction (EF 30%) with apical, septal and anterior wall akinesis, and lateral wall hypertrabecularization with multiple prominent trabeculations and deep intertrabecular recesses communicating with the cavity, suggestive for LVNC. Cardiac MRI documented dilated LV with EF 34%, anterior and antero-septal wall akinesis (associated with increased T1 mapping values and areas of LGE after contrast injection, compatible with ischaemic outcomes), infero-lateral wall hypokinesia and LV free wall marked hypertrabecularization with a ratio of not compacted(T)/compacted(M) myocardium of 5 (Petersen criteria for LVNC diagnosis: T/M > 2.3 in telediastolic long-axis view). The patient was discharged in stable clinical conditions in DAPT(Cardioaspirin and Ticagrelor). At two months cardiologic follow-up the patient was asymptomatic and TTE confirmed a dilated LV with severely depressed EF (30%). In consideration of the post-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy with severely depressed EF and of the family history of SCD (father deceased at 54-years-old), the patient was admitted in our Cardiology Unit and he underwent subcutaneous ICD (sICD) implantation. He was discharged in stable conditions with remote home monitoring transmitter. The association between LVNC and anomalous coronary artery origin is rare. LVNC is sometimes associated with coronary artery disease, but only rare cases of acute myocardial infarction have been described in literature, with exceptionally rare cases of LVNC incidental diagnosis after STEMI. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of LVNC associated with anomalous coronary artery origin and STEMI reported in literature. Some authors hypothesized that a single gene responsible for both myocardial development and coronary endothelium could be involved in the pathogenesis of LVNC and at the same time predispose to coronary atherosclerosis. Further studies are necessary in order to assess the possible pathophysiological mechanisms that correlate LVNC and coronary atherosclerosis. According to European guidelines, LVNC in the absence of additional risk factors is not an indication for primary ICD implantation, and for arrhythmic risk stratification it’s recommended to follow the criteria used for non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. The anomalous origin of the Cx from the RCA has an incidence of 0.37%, and it is generally not linked to an increased risk of SCD. Involvement of RV in LVNC cannot be excluded even when RV appears normal on CMR, and if involved there is higher risk of perforation by the lead. sICD overcomes disadvantages of transvenous ICD in patients without a need for pacing therapy. In literature use of sICD is reported only in 14 patients with LVNC, mainly children and young adults.

234 Echocardiographic visualization of retroaortic anomalous coronary artery

A 65-year-old female was admitted to our hospital for sudden onset of typical chest pain at rest lasting few minutes. Her medical background included systemic hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidaemia, and mild obesity. Upon arrival in the emergency room, the electrocardiogram didn’t reveal signs of acute myocardial ischaemia and serial cardiac troponin T measurements were persistently negative. A transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was performed, showing mild ventricular hypertrophy, no regional wall motion abnormalities, and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. A highly echogenic tubular structure, located slightly on the atrial side of the atrioventricular groove was noted in multiple apical views. Its tubular shape was suggestive of a vascular structure, but its location was atypical for a normal vessel; indeed its persistence in more than an echocardiographic plane excluded an artefact. According to patient’s clinical history and her high cardiovascular risk profile she was referred for coronary angiography, demonstrating no critical stenosis but an anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) from the inappropriate sinus of Valsalva: the left main coronary artery (LMCA) arose from the right coronary cusp and then took a caudal posterior loop running posterior to the aortic root. In light of these findings we could associate the tubular structure seen at TTE to the retroaortic course of LMCA, a finding recently described as retroaortic anomalous coronary (RAC) sign. Among AAOCA, the retroaortic course of the LMCA is an uncommon diagnosis in adults, and its association with a single coronary origin is extremely rare. Although it has been usually considered a benign clinical entity, it is associated with an increased risk in morbidity and mortality during valve surgery. The presence of RAC sign at TTE was demonstrated to be highly suggestive of an anomalous coronary artery (specificity 93.9%) and strongly associated with retroaortic LMCA course at computed tomography angiography. 234 Figure B

Bicuspid aortic valve and anomalous right coronary artery from the opposite coronary sinus

We report on a patient with bicuspid aortic valve and anomalous right coronary artery from the opposite sinus without evidence of intramural course. Different authors support the universal presence of intramural course in patients with origin of the right coronary artery from the opposite sinus of Valsalva in normal heart. The occurrence of both bicuspid aortic valve and the absence of intramural course may not be accidental. This might suggest a developmental interaction between bicuspid aortic valve and anomalous coronary artery. Large observational study including characterisation by intravascular ultrasonography in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and anomalous coronary is needed.

A Case of Malignant Course of Right Coronary Artery: Frequent Angina in Young Person

Introduction:Congenital anomalous coronary artery is a rare condition, but it might be the biggest pitfall for cardiologist. It might be silent until the patient reach young adult and has high intensity activity. Symptomatic anomalous course of coronary artery has wide spectrum from asymptomatic until the lethal one.Case Ilustration: We present a case of young adult with activity-triggered atypical chest pain and diagnose with anomalous origin of right coronary artery (RCA) from the left coronary sinus with inter-arterial course between the aorta and the main pulmonary artery that was detected by CT coronary angiography. This anomaly has been called malignant course RCA.Discussion:Coronary artery anomaly is a congenital condition. Most of the cases are remain asymptomatic. This condition also one of the most cause for sudden cardiac death because the coronary artery examination is not regularly done. Nevertheless, during high intense activity, it will be symptomatic and might be lethal.Conclusion:Diagnose coronary artery anomalies might be tricky and cardiologist must be aware with this. More devastating, no firm guideline in treatment of right anomalous coronary artery from opposite sinus.

Anomalous coronary artery origin from the opposite sinus in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: comparison with tricuspid aortic valve

ObjectiveTo compare the prevalence and patterns of anomalous coronary artery origin from the opposite sinus (ACAOS) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV).MethodsRetrospective review of consecutive patients with surgically excised BAV and TAV was performed from 1994 to 2015. Clinical notes, echocardiograms, coronary angiograms, CT angiographies, and pathology reports were reviewed. ACAOS included right coronary artery from the left cusp, left circumflex artery from the right cusp and left main or left anterior descending artery from the right cusp.Results2371 (years 1994–2015) and 1679 (years 2009–2015) consecutive patients with pathology-confirmed BAV and TAV, respectively, and defined preoperative coronary anatomy were identified. A left dominant coronary circulation was present in 386 (18%) patients with BAV and 179 (11%) patients with TAV (p<0.001). ACAOS was identified in 43 (1.8%) patients with BAV and 15 (0.9%) patients with TAV, p=0.02. Among patients with BAV and ACAOS, the most common phenotype was right-left fusion (n=34, 79%) with present raphe (n=36, 84%), with no association between BAV phenotype and ACAOS type. On multivariate analysis, BAV status and size of the mid-ascending aorta were independently associated with ACAOS (OR 3.29; CI 1.26 to 8.6; p=0.02; OR 0.93; CI 0.87 to 0.98; p=0.01; respectively). Only two patients with ACAOS, one with BAV and one with TAV, had a perioperative coronary ischaemic event.ConclusionsThe prevalence of the potentially malignant ACAOS is significantly higher (threefold higher odds) in patients with BAV as compared with TAV, yet remains uncommon in absolute terms. Most patients with BAV and ACAOS had right-left cusp fusion and present raphe. Perioperative coronary events are rare in patients with ACAOS.

Hybrid cardiac imaging-guided optimal management of right anomalous coronary artery origin from the opposite sinus with interarterial course (R-ACAOS): a case report

Background Determining the optimal management of right anomalous coronary artery from the opposite sinus (R-ACAOS) with an interarterial course (IAC) in middle-aged adults remains elusive. Hybrid cardiac imaging combining non-invasive and invasive approaches to identify high-risk anatomic features, as well as functional testing to assess potential ischaemic status by dynamic compression, can guide therapeutic decisions. Case summary A 65-year-old female was newly diagnosed with R-ACAOS with IAC, accompanied by suspected angina and two syncope episodes. She was initially considered as non-specific chest pain based on negative treadmill test (TMT) taken 10 years earlier. An anomaly of R-ACAOS with IAC travelling between the aorta and pulmonary artery was detected by coronary computed tomography angiography with a severe stenosis at the ostium, but with little evidence of atherosclerotic plaque. Exercise test (TMT) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) results were negative. Invasive imaging revealed a luminal area stenosis of 45% at the ostial right coronary artery, and a slit-like orifice anatomical feature, with a minimal lumen area of 5.81 mm2 at diastole determined by intravascular ultrasound. Based on hybrid cardiac imaging results and previous data from a case series, conservative management was recommended with strenuous exercise restrictions. The patient fared well during 12 months of follow-up after discharge. Discussion Hybrid cardiac imaging-guided conservative management including exercise restriction appears justifiable in such middle-aged adults with R-ACAOS accompanied by suspected angina in absence of ischaemia in stress-induced tests (TMT or SPECT), despite high-risk anatomical features of an IAC and slit-like orifice being present.