capture cross
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1599
(FIVE YEARS 132)

H-INDEX

56
(FIVE YEARS 4)

Author(s):  
Abdul Kabir ◽  
Jameel-Un Nabi

Abstract Radiative capture p+9Be → 10B+γ at energies bearing astrophysical importance is a key process for the spectroscopic study of 10B. In this work, we consider the radiative capture cross-section for the 9Be(p, γ)10B within the framework of the potential model and the R-matrix method for the multi-entrance channel cases. In certain cases, when the potential fails, therefore, the R-matrix approach is better to use for the description of partial components of the cross-section that have sharp or broad resonances. For all possible electric and magnetic dipole transitions, partial components of the astrophysical S-factor are computed. The computed value of the total S-factor at zero energy is consistent with the reported results.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Ren ◽  
xichao ruan ◽  
Wei Jiang ◽  
Jie Bao ◽  
jincheng wang ◽  
...  

Abstract The capture cross sections of the 169Tm(n, γ) reaction were measured at the back streaming white neutron beam line (Back-n) of the China Spallation Neutron Source (CSNS) using four C6D6 liquid scintillation detectors. To obtain accurate cross sections, the background subtraction, normalization, and correction were carefully taken into consideration in the data analysis. For the resonance at 3.9 eV, the R-matrix code SAMMY was used to determine the resonance parameters with internally normalization method. While the average capture cross sections of 169Tm in the energy range between 30 keV and 300 keV were extracted relative to the 197Au(n, γ) reaction. The measured cross sections of the 169Tm(n, γ) reaction were reported in logarithmically equidistant energy bins with 20 bins per energy decade with a total uncertainty of 5.4%-7.0% in this paper, and described in terms of average resonance parameters by means of a Hauser-Feshbach calculation with fluctuations. Both of the point-wise cross sections and the averge resonance parameters showed fair agreement with the evaluated values of ENDF/B-VIII.0 library in the energy region studied.


2021 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 103996
Author(s):  
M. Kaddour ◽  
T. El Bardouni ◽  
H. Boukhal ◽  
M. Makhloul ◽  
E. Chakir

2021 ◽  
Vol 2103 (1) ◽  
pp. 012088
Author(s):  
A A Maksimova ◽  
A I Baranov ◽  
A V Uvarov ◽  
D A Kudryashov ◽  
A S Gudovskikh

Abstract In this work the properties of the BP/Si heterojunction interface were investigated by capacitance methods, the deep levels transient spectroscopy method and admittance spectroscopy. Admittance spectroscopy did not detect any defects, but the deep level transient spectroscopy showed response with activation energy of 0.33 eV and capture cross-section σn=(1-10)·10-19 cm2 and defect concentration (NT) is in the order of 1013 cm-3. This defect level is a trap for electron with position of 0.33 eV below the conduction band in region near the BP/Si interface.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iman Ziaeian ◽  
Károly Tőkési

AbstractWe present state-selective electron capture cross sections in collision between Be4+ and ground state hydrogen atom. The n- and nl-selective electron capture cross sections are calculated by a three-body classical trajectory Monte Carlo method (CTMC) and by a classical simulation schema mimicking quantum features of the collision system. The quantum behavior is taken into account with the correction term in the Hamiltonian as was proposed by Kirschbaum and Wilets (Phys Rev A 21:834, 1980). Calculations are carried out in the projectile energy range of 1–1000 keV/amu. We found that our model for Be4+ + H(1s) system remarkably improves the obtained state-selective electron capture cross sections, especially at lower projectile energies. Our results are very close and are in good agreement with the previously obtained quantum–mechanical results. Moreover, our model with simplicity can time efficiently carry out simulations where maybe the quantum mechanical ones become complicated, therefore, our model should be an alternative way to calculate accurate cross sections and maybe can replace the quantum–mechanical methods.


2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bhattacharyya ◽  
Ushasi Datta ◽  
A. Rahaman ◽  
S. Chakraborty ◽  
T. Aumann ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 22-29
Author(s):  
T. G. Samkharadze ◽  
O. B. Khavroshkin ◽  
V. V. Tsyplakov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document