Soya protein does not affect glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes

Evidence from observational, animal and human studies supports a role for soya protein and its isoflavones in the improvement of glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes. The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of isoflavone-rich soya protein on markers of glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. Using a randomised, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, adults with diet-controlled type 2 diabetes (n 29) consumed soya protein isolate (SPI) and milk protein isolate (MPI) for 57 d each separated by a 4-week washout. Blood was collected on days 1 and 57 of each treatment period for analysis of fasting HbA1C, and fasting and postprandial glucose, insulin and calculated indices of insulin sensitivity and resistance. Urine samples of 24 h were collected at the end of each treatment period for analysis of isoflavones. Urinary isoflavone excretion was significantly greater following consumption of SPI compared with MPI, and 20·7 % of the subjects (n 6) were classified as equol excretors. SPI consumption did not significantly affect fasting or postprandial glucose or insulin, fasting HbA1C, or indices of insulin sensitivity and resistance. These data do not support a role for soya protein in the improvement of glycaemic control in adults with diet-controlled type 2 diabetes and contribute to a limited literature of human studies on the effects of soya protein on the management of type 2 diabetes.

Comparison between surrogate indexes of insulin sensitivity and resistance and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp estimates in mice

Insulin resistance contributes to the pathophysiology of diabetes, obesity, and their cardiovascular complications. Mouse models of these human diseases are useful for gaining insight into pathophysiological mechanisms. The reference standard for measuring insulin sensitivity in both humans and animals is the euglycemic glucose clamp. Many studies have compared surrogate indexes of insulin sensitivity and resistance with glucose clamp estimates in humans. However, regulation of metabolic physiology in humans and rodents differs and comparisons between surrogate indexes and the glucose clamp have not been directly evaluated in rodents previously. Therefore, in the present study, we compared glucose clamp-derived measures of insulin sensitivity (GIR and SIClamp) with surrogate indexes, including quantitative insulin-sensitivity check index (QUICKI), homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), 1/HOMA, log(HOMA), and 1/fasting insulin, using data from 87 mice with a wide range of insulin sensitivities. We evaluated simple linear correlations and performed calibration model analyses to evaluate the predictive accuracy of each surrogate. All surrogate indexes tested were modestly correlated with both GIR and SIClamp. However, a stronger correlation between body weight per se and both GIR and SIClamp was noted. Calibration analyses of surrogate indexes adjusted for body weight demonstrated improved predictive accuracy for GIR [e.g., R = 0.68, for QUICKI and log(HOMA)]. We conclude that linear correlations of surrogate indexes with clamp data and predictive accuracy of surrogate indexes in mice are not as substantial as in humans. This may reflect intrinsic differences between human and rodent physiology as well as increased technical difficulties in performing glucose clamps in mice.