point singularity
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

49
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deeksha Chandorkar ◽  
Subham Dutta Chowdhury ◽  
Suman Kundu ◽  
Shiraz Minwalla

Abstract We study four-point functions of scalars, conserved currents, and stress tensors in a conformal field theory, generated by a local contact term in the bulk dual description, in two different causal configurations. The first of these is the standard Regge configuration in which the chaos bound applies. The second is the ‘causally scattering configuration’ in which the correlator develops a bulk point singularity. We find an expression for the coefficient of the bulk point singularity in terms of the bulk S matrix of the bulk dual metric, gauge fields and scalars, and use it to determine the Regge scaling of the correlator on the causally scattering sheet in terms of the Regge growth of this S matrix. We then demonstrate that the Regge scaling on this sheet is governed by the same power as in the standard Regge configuration, and so is constrained by the chaos bound, which turns out to be violated unless the bulk flat space S matrix grows no faster than s2 in the Regge limit. It follows that in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence, the chaos bound applied to the boundary field theory implies that the S matrices of the dual bulk scalars, gauge fields, and gravitons obey the Classical Regge Growth (CRG) conjecture.


2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yujin Dunham ◽  
Kazuki Kanki ◽  
Savannah Garmon ◽  
Satoshi Tanaka ◽  
Gonzalo Ordonez

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Li

Abstract It is difficult for us to discriminate the sizes of space and time as finite and infinite. In this article an axiom is defined in which one infinitely small and infinitely great must exist if the sizes of space and time can be compared and it is undividedly 0(zero) point (singularity) for this infinitely small.this axiom have some new characters distinct from current calculus ,such as extension only can be executed in the way of unit superposition in the system, the decimal point is meaningless and there aree only integers to exist in the system, and any given interval is finite quantites and can not be ‘included’ or ‘equal divided’ infinitely and randomly.The geometry space we see are the non-continuum being made of countless 0 points .


Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Khmelinskii ◽  
Leslie Woodcock

We review the experimental evidence, from both historic and modern literature of thermodynamic properties, for the non-existence of a critical-point singularity on Gibbs density surface, for the existence of a critical density hiatus line between 2-phase coexistence, for a supercritical mesophase with the colloidal characteristics of a one-component 2-state phase, and for the percolation loci that bound the existence of gaseous and liquid states. An absence of any critical-point singularity is supported by an overwhelming body of experimental evidence dating back to the original pressure-volume-temperature (p-V-T) equation-of-state measurements of CO2 by Andrews in 1863, and extending to the present NIST-2019 Thermo-physical Properties data bank of more than 200 fluids. Historic heat capacity measurements in the 1960s that gave rise to the concept of “universality” are revisited. The only experimental evidence cited by the original protagonists of the van der Waals hypothesis, and universality theorists, is a misinterpretation of the isochoric heat capacity Cv. We conclude that the body of extensive scientific experimental evidence has never supported the Andrews–van der Waals theory of continuity of liquid and gas, or the existence of a singular critical point with universal scaling properties. All available thermodynamic experimental data, including modern computer experiments, are compatible with a critical divide at Tc, defined by the intersection of two percolation loci at gaseous and liquid phase bounds, and the existence of a colloid-like supercritical mesophase comprising both gaseous and liquid states.


2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Parotto ◽  
Marcus Bluhm ◽  
Debora Mroczek ◽  
Marlene Nahrgang ◽  
J. Noronha-Hostler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document