hydrophobic modification
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

227
(FIVE YEARS 58)

H-INDEX

37
(FIVE YEARS 6)

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuhui Yan ◽  
Haojie Wang ◽  
Jieren Luo ◽  
Ye Lin ◽  
Yaxin Yang

Open Ceramics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 100212
Author(s):  
Jin Zhao ◽  
Shunzo Shimai ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Xiaojian Mao ◽  
Juan Liu ◽  
...  

Pharmaceutics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 1738
Author(s):  
Sang-Koo Park ◽  
Ga Yeon Noh ◽  
Hyun Woo Yu ◽  
Eun Chae Lee ◽  
Junoh Jeong ◽  
...  

The effects of the manufacturing process and the regeneration of Shirasu porous glass (SPG) membranes were investigated on the reproducibility of protein precipitants, termed protein microbeads. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was selected as a model protein to produce its microbeads in seven different cases. The results showed that the hydrophobically modified SPG membrane produced finer microbeads than the hydrophilic SPG membrane, but this was inconsistent when using the general regeneration method. Its reproducibility was determined to be mostly dependent on rinsing the SPG membrane prior to the modification and on the protein concentration used for emulsification. The higher concentration could foul and plug the membrane during protein release and thus the membrane must be washed thoroughly before hydrophobic modification. Moreover, the membrane regenerated by silicone resin dissolved in ethanol had better reproducibility than silicone resin dissolved in water. On the other hand, rinsing the protein precipitant with cold ethanol after the emulsification was not favorable and induced protein aggregation. With the addition of trehalose, the purity of the IVIG microbeads was almost the same as before microbeadification. Therefore, the regeneration method, protein concentration, and its stabilizer are key to the success of protein emulsification and precipitation using the SPG membrane.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document