Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Caudate Lobectomy: A Systematic Review

Resection of the caudate lobe of the liver is considered a highly challenging type of liver resection due to the region’s intimacy with critical vascular structures and deep anatomic location inside the abdominal cavity. Laparoscopic resection of the caudate lobe is considered one of the most challenging laparoscopic liver procedures. The objective of our systematic review was to evaluate the safety, technical feasibility and main outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobectomy LCL. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken for studies published until September 2021. A total of 20 studies comprising 221 patients were included. Of these subjects, 36% were women, whereas the vast majority of resections (66%) were performed for malignant tumors. Tumor size varied significantly between 2 and 160 mm in the largest diameter. The mean operative time was 210 min (range 60–740 min), and estimated blood loss was 173.6 mL (range 50–3600 mL). The median hospital length of stay LOS was 6.5 days (range 2–15 days). Seven cases of conversion to open were reported. The vast majority of patients (93.7%) underwent complete resection (R0) of their tumors. Thirty-six out of 221 patients developed postoperative complications, with 5.8% of all patients developing a major complication (Clavien–Dindo classification ≥ III).No perioperative deaths were reported by the included studies. LCL seems to be a safe and feasible alternative to open caudate lobectomy OCL in selected patients when undertaken in high-volume centers by experienced surgeons.

Knowledge and Surgical Strategies for Successful Laparoscopic Caudate Lobectomy, a Comprehensive Literature Review

Laparoscopic approach in patients presenting caudate lobe lesions has always been considered prohibitive as technically demanding, so that the role of minimally invasive surgery for this posterior and deep location is still debated. Recently some studies presented cases of laparoscopic caudate lobectomy discussing how to manage technical challenges and providing excellent results. Innovative technologies for laparoscopic liver surgery are likely to improve the feasibility and reproducibility of laparoscopic liver resections in the near future especially for lesions located in the so called “difficult segments”.Still, laparoscopic caudate lobectomy remains unfamiliar to many surgeons and there are relatively few reports in the literature on this subject. For this reason, we conducted a comprehensive review of the literature to understand the safety and feasibility of LCL resections and discuss current and future perspectives.

Isolated Caudate Lobectomy: Glissonean Pedicle Transection Method, and Combined Right–left Side Approach. A Case Series Report

Tumors located in caudate lobe may be primary tumors, or metastases from other sites. Isolated caudate lobectomy (ICL) is a challenging procedure due to its complex structure and location. The access route to caudatelobe has an important role in the success of the operation. A combined right and left side approach is recommended for benign or suspected malignant tumor located anterior to the vena cava or entirely in the caudate lobe, which radical resection of the caudate is necessary. We report two cases of successfully with Glissonean pedicle transection method described by Takasaki and combined right and left side approach. We found this to be a safe and effective approach, which can be applied to all case of benign tumors; or in the case of malignant tumors located entirely in the caudate lobe when extended hepatic resection is not possible due to poor liver function. or small remnant liver volume.

Probiotic-related bacteremia after major hepatectomy for biliary cancer: a report of two cases

Background Probiotics have been reported to be beneficial for the prevention of postoperative complications and are often used during the perioperative period. Among the probiotic-related adverse events, bacteremia is rare. Here, we report two cases of probiotic-related bacteremia after major hepatectomy for biliary cancer. Case presentation 1 A 74-year-old man was referred to our hospital to be treated for gallbladder cancer. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, two courses of gemcitabine plus S-1 combination therapy, was administered. Extended right hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy, extrahepatic bile duct resection and biliary reconstruction were performed 3 weeks after chemotherapy. Probiotics, Clostridium butyricum (C. butyricum) MIYAIRI 588, were administered 6 days before surgery and continued after surgery. Sepsis of unknown origin occurred 17 days after surgery and developed into septic shock. C. butyricum was detected in blood cultures at postoperative day 26 and 45. After stopping the probiotic agent, C. butyricum was undetectable in the blood cultures. The patient died due to an uncontrollable sepsis 66 days after surgery. Case presentation 2 A 63-year-old man with diabetes mellitus whose past history included total colectomy, papillectomy, and Frey’s operation at the age of 19, 34 and 48, respectively, was referred to our hospital to be treated for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Extended left hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy, extrahepatic bile duct resection and reconstruction of bile duct were performed. Probiotics were administered during the perioperative period. Combined probiotics that included lactomin, amylolytic bacillus and C. butyricum, were given before surgery. C. butyricum MIYAIRI 588 was given after surgery. Sepsis occurred 16 days after surgery and developed to respiratory failure 8 days later. Blood culture at postoperative day 25 revealed Enterococcus faecalis and C. butyricum. After the probiotics were stopped at postoperative day 27, C. butyricum was not detected in the blood culture. The general condition improved with intensive care. The patient was transferred to another hospital for rehabilitation at postoperative day 156. Conclusion It should be noted that the administration of probiotics in severe postoperative complications can lead to probiotic-related bacteremia.

Laparoscopic isolated caudate lobe resection

Previously, isolated caudate lobectomy was rarely performed and the caudate lobe was usually resected along with other segments. Isolated caudate lobe resection is a challenging procedure even for an experienced surgeon. Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and outcomes of laparoscopic isolated caudate lobectomy and to compare these with the open technique. We retrospectively analyzed 21 patients who underwent isolated caudate lobectomy between January 2005 and December 2018 at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Patients who underwent either anatomical or non-anatomical resection of the caudate lobe were included. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they underwent laparoscopic or open surgery. Intra-operative and postoperative outcomes were compared with a median follow-up of 43 months (4–149). A total of 21 patients were included in the study. Of these, 12 (57.14%) underwent laparoscopic and nine (42.85%) underwent open caudate lobectomy. Median operation time (204.5 vs. 200 minutes, p = 0.397), estimated blood loss (250 vs. 400 ml, p = 0.214) and hospital stay (4 vs. 7 days, p = 0.298) were comparable between laparoscopy and open group. The overall post operative complication rate was similar in both groups (p = 0.375). The 5-year disease free survival rate (42.9% vs 60.0%, p = 0.700) and the 5-year overall survival rate (76.2% vs 64.8%, p = 0.145) was similar between laparoscopy and open group. Our findings demonstrate that with increasing surgical expertise and technological advances, laparoscopic isolated caudate lobectomy can become a feasible and safe in selected patients.