digested sludge
Recently Published Documents





Fuel ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 314 ◽  
pp. 123091
Daegi Kim ◽  
Gabin Kim ◽  
Doo Young Oh ◽  
Kee-Won Seong ◽  
Ki Young Park

Changwei Li ◽  
Nhat Le-Minh ◽  
James A. McDonald ◽  
Andrew S. Kinsela ◽  
Ruth M. Fisher ◽  

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 2839
Iryna Lanko ◽  
Jakub Hejnic ◽  
Jana Říhová-Ambrožová ◽  
Ivet Ferrer ◽  
Pavel Jenicek

Anaerobic digestion (AD) technology is commonly used to treat sewage sludge from activated sludge systems, meanwhile alleviating the energy demand (and costs) for wastewater treatment. Most often, anaerobic digestion is run in single-stage systems under mesophilic conditions, as this temperature regime is considered to be more stable than the thermophilic one. However, it is known that thermophilic conditions are advantageous over mesophilic ones in terms of methane production and digestate hygienisation, while it is unclear which one is better concerning the digestate dewaterability. Temperature-phased anaerobic digestion (TPAD) is a double-stage AD process that combines the above-mentioned temperature regimes, by operating a thermophilic digester followed by a mesophilic one. The aim of this study is to compare the digestate quality of single-stage mesophilic and thermophilic AD and TPAD systems, in terms of the dewaterability, pathogenic safety and lower calorific value (LCV) and, based on the comparison, consider digested sludge final disposal alternatives. The research is conducted in lab-scale reactors treating waste-activated sludge. The dewaterability is tested by two methods, namely, centrifugation and mechanical pressing. The experimental results show that the TPAD system is the most beneficial in terms of organic matter degradation efficiency (32.4% against 27.2 for TAD and 26.0 for MAD), producing a digestate with a high dewaterability (8.1–9.8% worse than for TAD and 6.2–12.0% better than for MAD) and pathogenic safety (coliforms and Escherichia coli were not detected, and Clostridium perfringens were counted up to 4.8–4.9 × 103, when for TAD it was only 1.4–2.5 × 103, and for MAD it was 1.3–1.8 × 104), with the lowest LCV (19.2% against 15.4% and 15.8% under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions, respectively). Regarding the final disposal, the digested sludge after TAD can be applied directly in agriculture; after TPAD, it can be used as a fertilizer only in the case where the fermenter HRT assures the pathogenic safety. The MAD digestate is the best for being used as a fuel preserving a higher portion of organic matter, not transforming into biogas during AD.

2021 ◽  
Vol 205 ◽  
pp. 117665
Zhiyao Wang ◽  
Tao Liu ◽  
Haoran Duan ◽  
Yarong Song ◽  
Xi Lu ◽  

2021 ◽  
Vol 321 ◽  
pp. 128893
Chen Cai ◽  
Chongliang Hu ◽  
Wan Yang ◽  
Yu Hua ◽  
Lei Li ◽  

2021 ◽  
Vol 147 (10) ◽  
pp. 04021037
Xiuqin Cao ◽  
Ji Yang ◽  
Ting Liu ◽  
Kaijin Zhu ◽  
Kunming Fu ◽  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document