wheeled mobility
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

128
(FIVE YEARS 19)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Mahsa Khalili ◽  
Chelsea Jonathan ◽  
Nicole Hocking ◽  
Machiel Van der Loos ◽  
W. Ben Mortenson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Bethany Semancik ◽  
Mark R. Schmeler ◽  
Richard M. Schein ◽  
Rachel Hibbs

Author(s):  
Mohsen Alizadeh Noghani ◽  
Drew Browning ◽  
Vincent Caccese ◽  
Elizabeth DePoy ◽  
Stephen Gilson ◽  
...  

Robotica ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Nakata ◽  
Satoshi Yagi ◽  
Shiqi Yu ◽  
Yifei Wang ◽  
Naoki Ise ◽  
...  

Abstract In this paper, we present an electrically driven childlike android named ibuki equipped with a wheeled mobility unit that enables it to move in a real environment. Since the unit includes a vertical oscillation mechanism, the android can replicate the movements of the human center of mass and can express human-like upper-body movements even when moving by wheels. Moreover, providing 46 degrees of freedom enables it to perform various human-like physical expressions. The development of ibuki, as well as the implementation and testing of several functions, is described. Finally, we discuss the potential advantages and future research direction of a childlike mobile android.


Author(s):  
Mahsa Khalili ◽  
Chelsea Jonathan ◽  
Nicole Hocking ◽  
Mike Van der Loos ◽  
Ben Mortenson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sol Lim ◽  
Clive D’Souza

Multiple field studies provide qualitative accounts of usability barriers experienced by users of wheeled mobility devices on public transit. This study aimed to examine these usability barriers from the theoretical perspective of Environmental Docility by quantifying the relationship between functional capabilities of wheeled mobility device users and ingress–egress performance on accessible fixed-route transit vehicles in an urban setting. Twenty-eight wheeled mobility users each completed three trips on a predetermined route through the local public transit system. Ingress and egress times, user-reported usability ratings and open-ended comments were analyzed. Regression analyses indicated significant interactions between age and minimum parallel-park length on ingress and egress times. Specifically, lower functional capability reflected in older age and less maneuvering ability predicted decreased performance (longer ingress–egress times), indicating less adaptability to environmental demands and agreement with the Environmental Docility Hypothesis. Usability ratings and comments revealed difficulty with negotiating access ramps and turning maneuvers in the vehicle interior and in proximity to other passengers. Despite compliance with accessibility standards, current design of transit vehicles present substantial usability barriers for wheeled mobility users. Environmental Docility provides a theoretical basis to identifying modifiable factors related to person and environment for improving usability of public transit for people aging and/or with mobility impairments.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 100975
Author(s):  
Mike Prescott ◽  
William C. Miller ◽  
Jaimie Borisoff ◽  
Polly Tan ◽  
Nova Garside ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaila K Ott ◽  
Richard M Schein ◽  
Joseph Straatmann ◽  
Mark R Schmeler ◽  
Brad E Dicianno

ABSTRACT Introduction The provision of seating and wheeled mobility devices is a complex process that requires trained professionals and multiple appointments throughout the service delivery process. However, this can be inconvenient and burdensome for individuals with mobility limitations or for individuals who live in rural areas. Rural areas often present unique difficulties regarding the provision of healthcare services including lengthy travel times to medical facilities and lack of specialized providers and medical technology. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of the development and implementation of a service delivery protocol for a home-based telerehabilitation assessment for wheelchair seating and mobility. Materials and Methods The telerehabilitation team consists of a trained wheelchair seating and mobility therapist and a telehealth clinical technician (TCT). In order to determine veterans that are appropriate for a home-based telerehabilitation assessment, a three-phase pre-assessment screening process was conducted by the therapist and TCT, including consult, chart, and phone review. Veterans that met all of the predetermined eligibility criteria were recommended for a telerehabilitation wheelchair assessment. The TCT traveled to the veteran’s residence with necessary evaluation and safety equipment and connected with the therapist remotely using the VA Video Connect platform. Assessment and veteran data were collected during the initial evaluation and then during a 21-day follow-up. Results Forty-three veterans were successfully seen via telerehabilitation for a seating and wheeled mobility assessment between November, 2017 and July, 2018. The average travel distance between the veteran’s residence and the clinic was 34.1 miles. The total telerehabilitation encounter times ranged from 45 min to 145 min. Conclusions The implementation of this service delivery protocol for wheelchair seating and mobility assessments demonstrated the benefits of using telehealth services including reaching rural veterans, reducing distance traveled, maximizing efficiency of provider schedules, and conducting realistic assessments in veterans’ home environments. Success can be attributed to being able to deliver best practice remotely and to the rapport of the TCT with the providers. Cultivating provider buy-in, selecting appropriate outcome measures, and restructuring workflows were additional lessons learned. The VA Video Connect platform is an accessible tool that can be easily learned by both veterans and providers and used beyond initial wheelchair seating evaluations for improved access to follow-up healthcare services.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-12
Author(s):  
Kaila K. Ott ◽  
Richard M. Schein ◽  
Andi Saptono ◽  
Brad E Dicianno ◽  
Mark R. Schmeler

The objective of this project was to measure Veteran and provider satisfaction with a home-based telerehabilitation assessment for wheelchair seating and mobility. Forty-three Veterans were seen remotely at their place of residence by a provider, using a VA Video Connect synchronous videoconferencing system. Veteran and provider satisfaction were collected using the Telerehabilitation Questionnaire (TRQ). Mean individual TRQ scores for both Veterans and providers were significantly higher than the scale midpoint of 3.5. Veterans had higher scores than providers for five individual items on the TRQ. Higher scores by Veterans on the technology and quality and clarity of the video and audio likely correspond to the differences in environmental settings in which the visit occurred for the Veteran compared with the provider. High satisfaction scores with the telerehabilitation assessments are likely attributed to the positive working relationship between the provider and the rehabilitation technician, who provided in-person technical support to the Veteran in the home during the wheeled mobility evaluation. Overall, the results indicate a high level of Veteran and provider satisfaction using telerehabilitation for wheelchair seating and mobility evaluations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Mitchell Bell ◽  
Richard M. Schein ◽  
Joseph Straatmann ◽  
Brad E. Dicianno ◽  
Mark R. Schmeler

The purpose of this study was to compare telehealth and in-person service delivery models for wheeled mobility devices in terms of functional outcomes. We hypothesized that clinically significant improvements in functional mobility measured by the Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA) will occur in individuals receiving both telehealth and in-person clinic evaluations. A total of 27 Veterans receiving telehealth visits were compared to 27 individuals seen in clinic, selected from a database, matching for age, gender, and primary diagnosis. All mean individual item and total FMA scores in both groups increased from Time 1 to Time 2. Within the telehealth group, all changes in individual item and total FMA scores were statistically significant, with changes in 8 of 10 items meeting threshold for clinical significance (change >1.85 points). Within the clinic group, changes in 7 of 10 individual items and total FMA scores were statistically significant, and these same 7 items met threshold for clinical significance. Change scores for individual item and total FMA scores did not differ significantly between the two groups. A larger and clinically significant change in transfer score was seen in the telehealth group, suggesting telehealth visits may confer an advantage in being able to assess and address transfer issues in the home.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document