scholarly journals Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Outcomes in Severe Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Ferrari ◽  
Stefano Siboni ◽  
Carlo Galdino Riva ◽  
Guglielmo Guerrazzi ◽  
Andrea Lovece ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Sphincter Pressure ◽  
Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Demeester Score

Introduction: Outcomes of laparoscopic procedures for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are variable depending on surgical expertise and/or patient-related factors. Some procedures may be inadequate in patients with severe disease. Effectiveness of laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) has not been extensively tested in patients with severe disease.Methods: A prospectively collected database was analyzed to identify patients who underwent MSA at a single institution. Individuals who had previous esophago-gastric surgery were excluded. Severe GERD was defined as lower esophageal sphincter pressure <5 mmHg, distal esophageal amplitude <30 mmHg, Barrett's metaplasia, stricture or grade C-D esophagitis, and/or DeMeester score >50. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe GERD were compared with those of patients with mild to moderate GERD who served as control group.Results: Over the study period, a total of 336 patients met the inclusion criteria, and 102 (30.4%) had severe GERD. The median follow-up was 24 months (IQR = 75) in severe GERD patients and 32 months (IQR = 84) in those with non-severe GERD. Patients with severe GERD had a higher rate of dysphagia and higher GERD-HRQL scores. After the MSA procedure, symptoms, health-related quality of life scores, and proton-pump inhibitors consumption significantly decreased in both groups (p < 0.05). No difference between groups was found in the prevalence of severe post-operative dysphagia, the need for endoscopic dilation or device removal, and the DeMeester score.Conclusion: Laparoscopic MSA is safe and effective in reducing symptoms, PPI use, and esophageal acid exposure also in patients with severe GERD.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and salivary pepsin in patients with heterotopic gastric mucosa in the upper esophagus

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Xiong ◽  
Suyu He ◽  
Fei Xu ◽  
Zhihong Xu ◽  
Xiumei Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ◽  
Gastric Mucosa ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Acid Reflux ◽  
Heterotopic Gastric Mucosa ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Reflux Symptom Index ◽  
Symptom Index ◽  
Demeester Score

Summary Background Heterotopic gastric mucosa in the upper esophagus (HGMUE) is reported to be related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study investigated the prevalence of GERD and the use of salivary pepsin to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux, especially proximal reflux, in HGMUE patients. Methods One hundred and fifty-three HGMUE patients and 50 healthy volunteers were studied. All subjects took a reflux symptom index questionnaire (RSI); underwent endoscopy, barium esophagogram, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH-metry (MII-pH); and salivary pepsin test. Results Ninety-five (62.1%) HGMUE patients but no control subjects were diagnosed with GERD. The salivary pepsin concentration, RSI score, DeMeester score, acid exposure time (AET), total reflux episodes, proximal acidic reflux episodes, and proximal weakly acidic reflux episodes were significantly higher in the HGMUE group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The salivary pepsin test showed a sensitivity of 85.9% and specificity of 56.9% for diagnosing GERD using the optimal cut-off value of 75 ng/mL. One hundred and seven (69.9%) and 46 (30.1%) HGMUE patients were categorized as pepsin (+) and pepsin (−), respectively when 75 ng/mL was used as a cut-off value. Male sex, RSI, AET, and proximal acid reflux episodes were positive predictive factors for the occurrence of pepsin (+) in HGMUE patients. Conclusions GERD, especially GERD with proximal acid reflux and related symptoms, was common in HGMUE patients. The salivary pepsin test could be an additional useful test for testing reflux in HGMUE patients, but it will not replace the MII-pH.

Clinical observation of different anti-reflux methods in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease with hiatus hernia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-tong Li ◽  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Xin-wei Han ◽  
Chun-xia Li ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Hiatus Hernia ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Demeester Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Experimental Group

Abstract Hiatus hernia (HH) is a common benign disease of the digestive tract, which weaks the function of the anti-reflux barrier and causes gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Laparoscopic HH repair and fundoplication is a classic surgical treatment for GERD patients with HH; however, some patients may complain of dysphagia and gas-bloating after the operation. For reducing complications of fundoplication, we adopted a new type of anti-reflux surgery for GERD treatment. We analysed our database of 40 patients with GERD plus HH who had LDF or a new anti-reflux surgery. At 12 months　after surgery, the total score(Sc), DeMeester score, numbers of reflux detected by impedance monitoring all decreased in two groups postoperatively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups after surgery. The minimum respiratory value increased after the operation in the control group, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. The mean respiratory value both increased in two groups postoperatively, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. The dysphagia in the experimental group was less common than that in the control group from early to 12 months after surgery. There was no significant difference in gas-bloating between the two groups in the early postoperative period but it was significantly lower in the experimental group than that in the control group in the late postoperative period. The short-term efficacy of the new anti-reflux surgery is the same as that of the LDP in the treatment of GERD with HH; however, the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and the surgical complication rate are lower than that of the LDF, therefore, it is more commonly recommended.

Food and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (19) ◽  
pp. 3497-3511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teodora Surdea-Blaga ◽  
Dana E. Negrutiu ◽  
Mariana Palage ◽  
Dan L. Dumitrascu
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽  
Lower Esophageal Sphincter ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Sphincter Pressure ◽  
Low Carbohydrate Diet ◽  
Reflux Symptoms ◽  
Esophageal Sphincter

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is a chronic condition with a high prevalence in western countries. Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation episodes and a decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure are the main mechanisms involved. Currently used drugs are efficient on reflux symptoms, but only as long as they are administered, because they do not modify the reflux barrier. Certain nutrients or foods are generally considered to increase the frequency of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, therefore physicians recommend changes in diet and some patients avoid bothering foods. This review summarizes current knowledge regarding food and gastroesophageal reflux. For example, fat intake increases the perception of reflux symptoms. Regular coffee and chocolate induce gastroesophageal reflux and increase the lower esophageal exposure to acid. Spicy foods might induce heartburn, but the exact mechanism is not known. Beer and wine induce gastroesophageal reflux, mainly in the first hour after intake. For other foods, like fried food or carbonated beverages data on gastroesophageal reflux is scarce. Similarly, there are few data about the type of diet and gastroesophageal reflux. Mediterranean diet and a very low carbohydrate diet protect against reflux. Regarding diet-related practices, consistent data showed that a “short-meal-to-sleep interval” favors reflux episodes, therefore some authors recommend that dinner should be at least four hours before bedtime. All these recommendations should consider patient’s weight, because several meta-analyses showed a positive association between increased body mass index and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: review of clinical studies

2018 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Asti ◽  
Alberto Aiolfi ◽  
Veronica Lazzari ◽  
Andrea Sironi ◽  
Matteo Porta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation

scholarly journals Food patterns in Russian patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the results of pilot comparative study

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (8) ◽  
pp. 66-72
Author(s):  
V. S. Kropochev ◽  
S. V. Morozov ◽  
M. A. Lantseva ◽  
A. N. Sasunova ◽  
V. I. Pilipenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽  
Healthy Eating ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Esophageal Ph ◽  
Symptom Evaluation ◽  
Source Data ◽  
Acid Exposure Time

Aim. To evaluate nutritional patterns in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) compared to the control group without GERD. Materials and methods. The data of complex examination of patients referred to perform esophageal pH-impedance recording and who gave written informed consent to participate in the study served as a source data. All the participants underwent complex examination, including clinical data (presence of heartburn and acid regurgitation), symptom evaluation (GERD-Q questionnaire), esophagogastroscopy, esophageal pH-impedance recordings and food frequency questionnaire. Diagnosis of GERD was based on GERD-Q score 8, acid exposure time 6%, number of gastroesophageal refluxes 80/day by 24-hrs esophageal pH-impedance recordings. Nutritional patterns were assessed with the use of healthy eating pyramid principles. Results. Overall 165 patients were enrolled and the data of 150 of them (34 with confirmed GERD and 116 of the control group) were available for the final analysis. The patients of the both groups consumed lower compared to the recommended amounts of dairy and higher amounts of meat. Those with GERD consumed larger amounts of fruits (0.910.68 compared to the values of healthy eating pyramid vs 0.520.57 in the control group, p=0.001), and fats (0.690.55 vs 0.490.55, p=0.001). Compared to the controls, patients with GERD consumed lower amounts of vegetables (0.860.46 of the healthy eating pyramid vs 0.940.63 in the control group, р=0.004) and sugars confectionaries (0.380.39 vs 1.930.98, p=0.0001). Conclusion. Nutritional patterns of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease significantly differ compared to the control group. The obtained data may be used for diet modification in patients with arterial hypertension.

scholarly journals Disorders of social functioning and quality of life in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease while combined with undifferentiated connective tissue dysplasia

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Iryna Romash
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Gastroesophageal Reflux ◽  
Social Functioning ◽  
Reflux Disease ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Introduction. It has been scientifically confirmed that the risk of developing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) increases especially with generalized or regional disruption of connective tissue structure, which is widespread among the population. Patients with such comorbid pathology may have a wide range of symptoms that may go beyond the general symptoms of heartburn and regurgitation. The symptoms and complications of GERD affect general health, daily and social functioning, physical and emotional activity. It also affects the quality of life (QoL) associated with health through frequent breaks during sleep, work and social activities. Purpose. study the dynamics of the level of quality of life and social functioning in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in combination with the syndrome of undifferentiated connective tissue dysplasia. Methodology. A total of 120 patients were included in the study: 65 men and 55 women: in 75 of them (Group II) GERD occurred on the background of UCTD, in 45 (Group I) as an independent disease. The control group consisted of 12 healthy individuals. The study was comprehensive. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Status (SF-36),the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and the scale of "Personal and social performance" (PSP) -  were used to study patients in detail. Results and Discussion. Analyzing the results obtained on the basis of the GSRS questionnaire (Table 1), in patients with GERD on the background of UCTD, compared with patients of group I and the control group, there is a significant increase in three and four from the five scales. QoL in patients of Group II on the scale "Abdominal pain" were 14.3 ± 0.4 points, in Group I - 5.6 ± 1.3 points, in the Control Group - 2.4 ± 0.8 points, on the scale "Reflux syndrome": 13.7 ± 0.9, 10.5 ± 1.3 and 3.1 ± 0.9, respectively. "Dyspeptic syndrome" - 15.3 ± 0.4 points in Group II, 12.2 ± 0.6- in Group I and 6.1 ± 0.3- in the control group. "Constipation syndrome" 9.5 ± 0.8, 5.6 ± 1.03 and 5.7 ± 0.4, respectively (p <0,05). Conclusions: In this research we investigated the effect of comorbid pathology on QoL in patients with GERD, which developed against the background of UCTD. The results confirm that patients with such combined pathology have a lower level of quality of life and social functioning, and the tactics of treatment of such patients should take into account these changes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document