Subjective and Objective Quality-of-Life Assessment of Outcome Measures in Cervical Spine Surgery for Degenerative Changes

Author(s):  
Marek Prokopienko ◽  
Michał Sobstyl

AbstractCervical spine diskectomy is a commonly used procedure in degenerative disease of cervical spine surgery. However, it is difficult to assess the quality of life after this widely applied and variously modified procedure. This literature review presents cervical diskectomy results, according to various scales and measures in multidirectional surgical strategies. Using relevant databases, we tried to find the best treatment options for degenerative disk disease and the best method of quality-of-life assessment, searching for modalities that may influence the outcome.

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Lubelski ◽  
Vincent Alentado ◽  
Amy S Nowacki ◽  
Michael Shriver ◽  
Kalil G Abdullah ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Clinical and quality of life (QOL) outcomes vary depending on the patient's demographics, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, pathology, and surgical treatment used. While there have been individual predictors identified, no comprehensive method incorporates a patient's complex clinical presentation to predict a specific individual postoperative outcome. OBJECTIVE To create tool that predicts patient-specific outcomes among those undergoing cervical spine surgery. METHODS A total of 952 patients at a single tertiary care institution who underwent anterior or posterior cervical decompression/fusion between 2007 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes included postoperative emergency department visit or readmission within 30 d, reoperation within 90 d for infection, and changes in QOL outcomes. Nomograms were modeled based on patient demographics and surgical variables. Bootstrap was used for internal validation. RESULTS Bias-corrected c-index for emergency department visits, readmission, and reoperation were 0.63, 0.78, and 0.91, respectively. For the QOL metrics, the bias-corrected adjusted R-squared was EQ-5D (EuroQOL): 0.43, for PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9): 0.35, and for PDQ (Pain/Disability Questionnaire): 0.47. Variables predicting the clinical outcomes varied, but included race and median income, body mass index, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, indication for surgery, surgery type, and levels. For the QOL nomograms, the predictors included similar variables, but were significantly more affected by the preoperative QOL of the patient. CONCLUSION These prediction models enable referring physicians and spine surgeons to provide patients with personalized expectations regarding postoperative clinical and QOL outcomes following a cervical spine surgery. After appropriate validation, use of patient-specific prediction tools, such as nomograms, has the potential to lead to superior spine surgery outcomes and more cost effective care.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen P Hayhurst ◽  
Jennifer A Massie ◽  
Graham Dunn ◽  
Shôn W Lewis ◽  
Richard J Drake

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nana Ren ◽  
Guangmin Yang ◽  
Xiaofeng Ren ◽  
Lekun Li

Abstract Background Long-term recovery of patients undergone cervical spine surgery is of paramount importance to improve their quality of life. In this study we aimed to evaluate the effects of foot massage on relieving pain and anxiety of patients with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods Enrolled patients undergone ACDF and diagnosed with anxiety disorder at least six months before surgery were treated with 10-min foot massage on a daily basis for four weeks using sweet almond oil. Patients were assessed by neck pain visual analog pain scale (NP-VAS), neck disability index (NDI) and self-rating anxiety scale. Results More significant relief in NP-VAS was observed in patients who received foot massage treatment. No significant difference in NDI reduction was seen in patients with or without the treatment. Intervention group demonstrated less anxiety during follow-up (p = 0.021) compared to the control group and more reduction compared to baseline (p = 0.046). In terms of quality of life, while both groups demonstrated improvement in pain relief (p = 0.015 for the intervention group and p = 0.037 for the control group), only the intervention group showed improved mental function (p = 0.031). Conclusion This study found that foot massage was effective in alleviating pain and anxiety, while improving quality of life in patients undergone ACDF, indicating that this intervention should be considered in the clinical management of these patients.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 553-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silky Chotai ◽  
Scott L. Parker ◽  
Ahilan Sivaganesan ◽  
Saniya S. Godil ◽  
Matthew J. McGirt ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: As part of the Affordable Care Act, health utility metrics are being investigated to define a cost-effective, value-based health care model. EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) and Short Form-6D (SF-6D) are commonly used quality-of-life instruments. Domains in the EQ-5D questionnaire are thought to be less responsive in measuring quality of life after cervical surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and responsiveness of SF-6D and EQ-5D in determining health and quality of life after elective cervical spine surgery. METHODS: A total of 420 patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery over a period of 2 years were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal registry. Patient-reported outcomes Neck Disability Index (NDI), EQ-5D, and SF-12 were recorded. Based on previously published equations, SF-6D was calculated using NDI and SF-12 scores. Patients were asked whether “surgery met their expectations” (meaningful improvement). The validity and relative responsiveness of SF-6D (NDI), SF-6D (SF-12), and EQ-5D to discriminate between meaningful and nonmeaningful improvement were calculated. RESULTS: Sixty-six percent of patients (277) reported a level of improvement after surgery that met their expectations (meaningful improvement). SF-6D (NDI) (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.69) was a more valid discriminator of meaningful improvement compared with the SF-6D (SF-12) (AUC = 0.65) and EQ-5D (AUC = 0.62). SF-6D (NDI) was also a more responsive measure compared with SF-6D (SF-12) and EQ-5D (standardized response mean difference: 0.66, 0.48, and 0.44, respectively). CONCLUSION: SF-6D is a more valid and responsive measure of general health and quality of life compared with EQ-5D. SF-6D derived from disease-specific disability scores was more valid and responsive than that derived from the generic preference-based SF-12. Cost-effective studies should use SF-6D as a measure of QALY after cervical spine surgery.


Radiology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 259 (3) ◽  
pp. 785-792 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona M. Fennessy ◽  
Chung Yin Kong ◽  
Clare M. Tempany ◽  
J. Shannon Swan

Author(s):  
Makarova E. V. ◽  
◽  
Krysanov I. S. ◽  
Vasilyeva T. P. ◽  
Alexandrova O. Yu. ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document