slug tests
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

177
(FIVE YEARS 30)

H-INDEX

26
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 2545-2553
Author(s):  
Katerina Mazi ◽  
Evangelos Akylas ◽  
Antonis D. Koussis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 282
Author(s):  
Francesco Chidichimo ◽  
Michele De Biase ◽  
Carmine Fallico ◽  
Samuele De Bartolo ◽  
Mario Ianchello ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Quan Liu ◽  
Linwei Hu ◽  
Peter Bayer ◽  
Yixuan Xing ◽  
Pengxiang Qiu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. Hommersen ◽  
Patryk M. Quinn ◽  
Beth Parker
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
C. Fallico ◽  
S. De Bartolo ◽  
G. F. A. Brunetti ◽  
G. Severino

Abstract We present an experimental study aiming at the identification of the hydraulic conductivity in an aquifer which was packed according to four different configurations. The conductivity was estimated by means of slug tests, whereas the other parameters were determined by the grain size analysis. Prior to the fractal we considered the dependence of the conductivity upon the porosity through a power (scaling) law which was found in a very good agreement within the range from the laboratory to the meso-scale. The dependence of the conductivity through the porosity was investigated by identifying the proper fractal model. Results obtained provide valuable indications about the behavior, among the others, of the tortuosity, a parameter playing a crucial role in the dispersion phenomena taking place in the aquifers.


2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 57-66
Author(s):  
Thao Bach Nguyen ◽  

Two different slug test methods including: i) slug test using the standard slug rod and ii) pneumatic slug test are conducted in different well/depth in Danphuong field site for a comparative analysis. These methods are examined at least 3 times for each well to estimate hydraulic conductivities by using Hvorslev. The results show correlation between two slug test methods is very hight with R2 = 0,93. Slug tests methods have several advantages and also disadvantage compare to each other. Practical considerations of performing the tests in real life settings are also considered in the method comparison. The slug-rod method meets 7/10 criterions while pneumatic slug test satisfy 8/10 criterions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document