network flow optimization
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

52
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 2)

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 21437-21452
Author(s):  
Beomjun Kim ◽  
Jeongho Kim ◽  
Subin Huh ◽  
Seungil You ◽  
Insoon Yang

CCIT Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-169
Author(s):  
Lukman Lukman ◽  
Rahmat Hidayat ◽  
Muhammad Fachrul Risqi Pribadi

The increasing development of the Internet today is in line with the complexity of on line on the internet. So the Network flow optimization became the main problems related to the election of the shortest route (routing protocol). Focus on research is to find out and compare the process with the shortest route in the search algorithm is Greedy algorithm and A * in order to reduce the workload of the network. Model comparison algorithm that is done is look at the workings of each algorithm against the determination of the routing path from the sender to the receiver. On the basis of the implementation of the experiment it was found that the algorithm a * greedy algorithm finds its way with the same. but it is clear for the a * would be more effective if applied on a broad network as well as complicated. Because the calculation uses a * definite while greedy simply looked at what is the most short front side towards the next node that was selected when the end result can be greater than the calculation of a


Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Veintimilla-Reyes ◽  
Annelies De Meyer ◽  
Dirk Cattrysse ◽  
Eduardo Tacuri ◽  
Pablo Vanegas ◽  
...  

The allocation of water flowing through a river-with-reservoirs system to optimally meet spatially distributed and temporally variable demands can be conceived as a network flow optimization (NFO) problem and addressed by linear programming (LP). In this paper, we present an extension of the strategic NFO-LP model of our previous model to a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model to simultaneously optimize the allocation of water and the location of one or more new reservoirs; the objective function to minimize only includes two components (floods and water demand), whereas the extended LP-model described in this paper, establishes boundaries for each node (reservoir and river segments) and can be considered closer to the reality. In the MILP model, each node is called a “candidate reservoir” and corresponds to a binary variable (zero or one) within the model with a predefined capacity. The applicability of the MILP model is illustrated for the Machángara river basin in the Ecuadorian Andes. The MILP shows that for this basin the water-energy-food nexus can be mitigated by adding one or more reservoirs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (20) ◽  
pp. 4072-4080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo M Deist ◽  
Andrew Patti ◽  
Zhaoqi Wang ◽  
David Krane ◽  
Taylor Sorenson ◽  
...  

Abstract Motivation In a predictive modeling setting, if sufficient details of the system behavior are known, one can build and use a simulation for making predictions. When sufficient system details are not known, one typically turns to machine learning, which builds a black-box model of the system using a large dataset of input sample features and outputs. We consider a setting which is between these two extremes: some details of the system mechanics are known but not enough for creating simulations that can be used to make high quality predictions. In this context we propose using approximate simulations to build a kernel for use in kernelized machine learning methods, such as support vector machines. The results of multiple simulations (under various uncertainty scenarios) are used to compute similarity measures between every pair of samples: sample pairs are given a high similarity score if they behave similarly under a wide range of simulation parameters. These similarity values, rather than the original high dimensional feature data, are used to build the kernel. Results We demonstrate and explore the simulation-based kernel (SimKern) concept using four synthetic complex systems—three biologically inspired models and one network flow optimization model. We show that, when the number of training samples is small compared to the number of features, the SimKern approach dominates over no-prior-knowledge methods. This approach should be applicable in all disciplines where predictive models are sought and informative yet approximate simulations are available. Availability and implementation The Python SimKern software, the demonstration models (in MATLAB, R), and the datasets are available at https://github.com/davidcraft/SimKern. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (9) ◽  
pp. 1613-1626
Author(s):  
Ye Zhang ◽  
Wenlong Lyu ◽  
Wai-Shing Luk ◽  
Fan Yang ◽  
Hai Zhou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document