optimal velocity model
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

96
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Xiaoqin Li ◽  
Yanyan Zhou ◽  
Guanghan Peng

Traffic interruption is one of the important factors resulting in traffic jam. Therefore, a new optimal velocity model is established involving the traffic interruption probability for self-expected velocity. Linear stable condition and mKdV equation are deduced with regard to the self-interruption probability of the current optimal velocity from linear stable analysis and nonlinear analysis, respectively. Moreover, numerical simulation reveals that the traffic self-interruption probability of the current optimal velocity can increase traffic stability, which certifies that the traffic self-interruption probability of the current optimal velocity plays important influences on traffic system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Da-wei Liu ◽  
Zhong-ke Shi ◽  
Wen-Huan Ai

In order to make the car-following model describe the driving behavior of vehicle on urban road more accurately, existing car-following models are simulated using measured traffic data. According to the analysis of the simulation result, two new improved car-following models based on the optimal velocity model (OVM) are proposed in this paper. The lateral vehicle’s influence is introduced as the influence factor of driving behavior. By using of linear stability analysis, stability conditions of improved car-following models are obtained. Nonlinear analysis is carried out to investigate the traffic performances near the critical point. The result of numerical simulation indicates that stability of traffic flow is under the influence from lateral vehicle; the lesser the influence, the greater the stability. New cooperative car-following models are verified by the traffic flow data collected in Xi’an city. It is shown that compared with the optimal velocity model, the simulation result of the second cooperative model, respectively, gets 62.89% unbiased variance reduction, 66.39% maximum absolute error reduction, and 33.4% minimum absolute error reduction. Therefore, the second cooperative model is more suitable to describe the vehicle’s actual behavior in car-following state.


Author(s):  
Valentina Kurtc

A large-scale naturalistic vehicle trajectory dataset from German highways, highD, was used to investigate the car-following behavior of individual drivers. These data include trajectories of 110,000 vehicles recorded for a duration of 16.5 h. Solving a nonlinear optimization problem, the intelligent driver model and the optimal velocity model with two leaders in interaction were calibrated by minimizing the deviations between the observed and simulated gaps when following the prescribed leading vehicle. The obtained calibration errors ranged between 5.2% and 6.9%, which were slightly lower than previous findings. This was explained by the shorter highD trajectories, predominantly free-flow traffic, and the good precision metrics of this dataset. The optimal velocity model with multivehicle anticipation resulted in lower calibration errors. This confirmed that natural drivers take into account several leading vehicles ahead. The ratio between interdriver and intradriver variability was investigated by performing global and platoon calibrations. Intradriver variation accounted for a larger portion of the calibration errors than interdriver variation. We analyzed the acceleration time-series of the natural highD and artificial drivers using simulations of two car-following models. A new cumulative measure, proportional to the energy of the follower’s position time-series curve, was calculated both for natural and modeled drivers. Human drivers had higher energy and demonstrated more acceleration fluctuations, sometimes behaving irrationally. In contrast, artificial drivers followed the logical rules incorporated in the model, resulting in a smoother acceleration profile. This led to less fuel consumption and gas emissions.


IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 216162-216175
Author(s):  
Weilin Ren ◽  
Rongjun Cheng ◽  
Hongxia Ge ◽  
Qi Wei

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document