fast mapping
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

232
(FIVE YEARS 55)

H-INDEX

35
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2022 ◽  
pp. 108156
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Perikova ◽  
Evgeny Blagovechtchenski ◽  
Margarita Filippova ◽  
Olga Shcherbakova ◽  
Alexander Kirsanov ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1366
Author(s):  
Emma L. Axelsson ◽  
Jaclyn Swinton ◽  
Isabel Y. Jiang ◽  
Emma V. Parker ◽  
Jessica S. Horst

Children can easily link a novel word to a novel, unnamed object—something referred to as fast mapping. Despite the ease and speed with which children do this, their memories for novel fast-mapped words can be poor unless they receive memory supports such as further exposure to the words or sleep. Axelsson, Swinton, Winiger, and Horst (2018) found that 2.5-year-old children who napped after fast mapping had better retention of novel words than children who did not nap. Retention declined for those who did not nap. The children received no memory supports and determined the word–object mappings independently. Previous studies report enhanced memories after sleeping in children and adults, but the napping children’s retention in the Axelsson et al. study remained steady across time. We report a follow-up investigation where memory supports are provided after fast mapping to test whether memories would be enhanced following napping. Children’s retention of novel words improved and remained greater than chance; however, there was no nap effect with no significant difference between the children who napped and those who did not. These findings suggest that when memory supports are provided, retention improves, and the word–object mappings remain stable over time. When memory traces are weak and labile, such as after fast mapping, without further memory supports, sleeping soon after helps stabilise and prevent decay of word–object mappings.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Ming Yean SIA ◽  
Julien MAYOR

Abstract Children learn words in ambiguous situations, where multiple objects can potentially be referents for a new word. Yet, researchers debate whether children maintain a single word-object hypothesis – and revise it if falsified by later information – or whether children establish a network of word-object associations whose relative strengths are modulated with experience. To address this issue, we presented 4- to 12-year-old children with sets of mutual exclusivity (fast-mapping) trials: offering them with obvious initial hypotheses (that the novel object is the referent for the novel word). We observe that children aged six years and above, despite showing a novelty bias and retaining this novel word – novel object association, also formed an association between the novel word and the name-known object, thereby suggesting that older children attend to more than one word-object association, in a manner similar to associative learning. We discuss our findings in the context of competing theoretical accounts related to word learning.


2021 ◽  
pp. 152574012110174
Author(s):  
Brian K. Weiler ◽  
Allyson L. Decker

To explore the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and language domain (vocabulary, syntax, process), the QUILS was administered to 212 kindergartners. Children from very-high poverty schools performed significantly below children from high poverty and mid-low poverty schools. SES impacts language-learning processes (i.e., fast mapping) in addition to language products (i.e., vocabulary, syntax).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document