urgent care center
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

72
(FIVE YEARS 38)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
pp. 1357633X2110690
Author(s):  
Veronica Sikka ◽  
Christian King ◽  
Suzanne Klinker ◽  
Theresa Mont ◽  
Bonnie Sommers-Olson ◽  
...  

Introduction Although telemedicine was predominantly adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic, its impact on healthcare outcomes in the veteran population in achieving first contact resolution, or the ability to safely manage patient care at home from an urgent care perspective, is yet to be determined. Methods This study included 13,090 veteran patient episodes who presented to the Department of Veteran's Affairs Veterans Integrated Services Network 8's Clinical Contact Center, a virtual urgent care organization covering South Georgia, Florida, and U.S. Virgin Islands in providing episodic care, between March 2020 and February 2021. Multivariate logistic regression estimated the probability that veterans with COVID-19-related symptoms stayed at home compared to presenting to the emergency department (ED) or their primary care provider. Results Patients with COVID-related symptoms were 33% less likely to present to the ED compared to patients who presented with non-COVID-related symptoms. Discussion The virtual urgent care center enabled veterans to receive timely care and avoid public places that could potentially lead to a COVID-19 infection or infecting others.


2021 ◽  
pp. 130-141
Author(s):  
Anika Goodwin ◽  
Chloe T. L. Khoo

The availability of ocular telehealth services in the emergency department and urgent care center settings can facilitate the diagnosis and management of ocular complaints. While the start-up costs involving ophthalmic equipment and training modules may seem high, it is well worth the investment knowing that these services will increase patient satisfaction, improve overall clinical outcomes, and aid in the physician decision-making process in regard to patient transfers for eye emergencies. Although the majority of ophthalmic urgencies can be managed as outpatient, true ophthalmic emergencies may require more immediate evaluation in order to preserve good visual outcome. Gaps in the availability of ophthalmologists needed for the immediate evaluation of eye emergencies can be filled by the implementation of ocular telehealth.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hessam Bavafa ◽  
Anne Canamucio ◽  
Steven C. Marcus ◽  
Christian Terwiesch ◽  
Rachel M. Werner

We study capacity rationing by servers facing differentiated customer classes using data from the Veterans Health Administration, which is the largest integrated healthcare system in the U.S. Using more than 11 million health encounters over two years in which the system was capacity constrained, our study provides a comprehensive analysis of the impacts of provider availability shocks on care channel diversion and delays. The outcomes studied include emergency room (ER) visits broken down by type, urgent care center visits, office and phone visits with one’s own versus another provider, post-ER follow-up visits, and ER readmissions. Availability shocks in our analysis are a residualized measure characterizing weeks in which the provider has fewer (or more) office appointments than expected based on typical patterns. The main finding is that moving from two standard deviations above to two standard deviations below in availability shocks increases ER visits by 2.4%, or about 20,000 yearly ER visits. Interestingly, the increase in ER visits is only present for the non-emergent category, indicating differentiated service to emergent and non-emergent care requests; capacity-constrained providers still tend to the patients in most need. Another finding is that provider availability shocks delay and divert post-ER follow-up care. Yet there is no effect on ER readmissions, a severe outcome of delayed or foregone follow-up, indicating that providers ration by priority these follow-up appointments. This paper was accepted by Vishal Gaur, operations management.


2021 ◽  
pp. OP.21.00183
Author(s):  
Bonnie E. Gould Rothberg ◽  
Maureen E. Canavan ◽  
Sophia Mun ◽  
Tannaz Sedghi ◽  
Tracy Carafeno ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Acute care imposes a significant burden on patients and cancer care costs. We examined whether an advanced practice provider-driven, cancer-specific urgent care center embedded within a large tertiary academic center decreased acute care use among oncology patients on active therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a quasi-experimental study anchored around the Oncology Extended Care Clinic (OECC) opening date. We evaluated two parallel 4-month periods: a post-OECC period that followed a 5-month run-in phase, and the identical calendar period 1 year earlier. Our primary outcomes included all emergency department (ED) presentations and hospital admissions during the 3-month window following the index provider visit. We used Poisson models to calculate absolute pre-OECC v post-OECC rate differences. RESULTS: Our cohort included 2,095 patients in the pre-OECC period and 2,188 in the post-OECC period. We identified 32.6 ED visits/100 patients and 41.2 hospitalizations/100 patients in the pre-OECC period, versus 28.2 ED visits/100 patients and 26.1 hospitalizations/100 patients post-OECC. After adjusting for age, sex, race and ethnicity, and practice location, we observed a significant decrease of 4.6 ED visits/100 patients during the post-OECC period (95% CI, –8.92/100 to –0.28/100; P = .04) compared with the pre-OECC period. There was no significant association between the OECC opening and hospitalization rate (rate difference: –3.29 admissions/100 patients; 95% CI, –8.24/100 to 1.67/100; P = .19). CONCLUSION: Establishing a cancer-specific urgent care center was significantly associated with a modest decrease in emergency room utilization but not with hospitalization rate. Barriers included clinic capacity, patient awareness, and physician comfort with advanced practice provider autonomy. Optimizing workflow and standardizing clinical pathways can create benchmarks useful for value-based payments.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56
Author(s):  
Abdalhamid Al Harash ◽  
Gina Laginya ◽  
William T. Ayoub

Objective: Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis in the United States. Despite published guidelines, management remains suboptimal, leading to unnecessary morbidity and increased cost of care. We have designed the gout disease management program (GDMP) to improve outcomes, increase patient satisfaction, and decrease healthcare utilization. Methods: Gout patients were seen at their usual rheumatology clinical visit and offered participation in the GDMP. Data were collected between April 2017 and November 2019. Serum uric acid (SUA) levels were measured at the initial outpatient encounter, at the entrance to GDMP, and every 4 weeks until SUA was at the goal of ≤6 mg/dl. Through telephonic encounters, gout-related recent hospitalizations, and ER or urgent care visits since the last encounter were ascertained. Self-reported gout medication usage and adherence were also determined. Patient satisfaction with GDMP was surveyed using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: A total of 158 patients were enrolled, of which 112 had ≥ 1 telephone encounter and were included in our analyses. During the telephone phase, 79 patients (70%) achieved the SUA goal of ≤6.0 mg/dl. Only 3 patients (2.6%) required hospitalization or visits to an ER or urgent care center due to gout flare, and 98% rated their encounter as a 5 on the 5-point Likert scale. Conclusion: Our telephone-based management program for gout led to improved clinical outcomes as defined by the ACR guidelines, decreased healthcare visits, and had high patient satisfaction. Significance and Innovations: • First telephone-based, rheumatology providers-led study to manage gout • Additional evidence to confirm the feasibility and benefit of telemedicine in common diseases • First study to show excellent patient satisfaction


2021 ◽  
pp. 667-673
Author(s):  
Mackenna Senti ◽  
Tania A. Torres ◽  
Jairo Espinosa ◽  
Saad Shebrain

A 50-year-old female with no significant medical history initially presented to an urgent care center with symptoms of acute onset abdominal pain, nausea, and emesis. Chest and abdominal X-ray revealed free air under the diaphragm, prompting immediate transfer to the emergency department. Continued abdominal tenderness and pain were concerning for perforated viscus. The patient was transferred to the operating room, and diagnostic laparoscopy was performed. Inflammation and contamination were discovered in the right side of the abdomen and pelvis secondary to a small bowel (SB) perforation. Segmental SB resection revealed a perforated diverticulum. Pathological examination confirmed a diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) at the perforated segment. On postoperative day 5, the patient was discharged home, and at 30-month follow-up, the patient continued to do well. Although rare, SB diverticula are commonly false (i.e., pseudodiverticula). The concomitant presence of a GIST in a true SB diverticulum presenting with perforation has not yet been reported.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey Black ◽  
Dzifa Adjaye-Gbewonyo

This report examines urgent care center or retail health clinic visits among adults in the past 12 months by sex and selected characteristics.


Author(s):  
Brandon J. Crivello ◽  
B. Clifton Whitworth ◽  
Vanessa K. Pazdernik ◽  
Ishwpriya Singh ◽  
James M. Freihofer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document