BACKGROUND Salivary gland diseases are rare but an important group of disorders. Following surgeries involving the parotid gland, facial nerve paresis is a common postoperative complication. The reported worldwide incidence of facial nerve paresis following parotidectomy is approximately 20 - 60 %. We need to determine the incidence of facial nerve paresis in the post-operative period following superficial, adequate, or extra-capsular parotidectomy of benign parotid tumours with the use of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring. METHODS A non-randomised interventional trial was initiated once cleared by the institutional review board. With the calculated sample size of 44, the patients underwent nervemonitoring for the identification of the branches of the facial nerve. Clinical grading of the nerve function was done using the House-Brackmann score on the postoperative days 2, 7, and 60. The findings were compared with the historical controls (HC) of 53 patients who underwent similar procedures but with no intraoperative facial nerve monitoring. All patients were recruited in continuity for over two years. RESULTS The incidence of facial nerve paresis was 30 - 40 % and 10 - 20 % in the historical control and nerve monitoring group, respectively (P = 0.07). The duration of surgery in the nerve monitoring group was 83 ± 30 minutes and 95 ± 15 minutes in the HC group. The incidence of nerve paresis was similar among the trainees and consultants suggestive of adequate training. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring is a useful adjunct to reduce the incidence of early postoperative facial nerve paresis. The technique would not prolong the duration of the procedure. The technique may be utilized safely on a routine basis even during surgical training. KEYWORDS Facial Nerve Monitoring, Parotidectomy, Benign Parotid Tumour, HouseBrackmann Score