dopaminergic mechanism
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

82
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S293-S294
Author(s):  
Charlotte Horne ◽  
Lucy Vanes ◽  
Timea Szentgyorgyi ◽  
Tess Verneuil ◽  
Elias Mouchlianitis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background It is estimated that one third of patients with schizophrenia fail to adequately respond to antipsychotic medication, termed ‘treatment-resistance’. This occurs despite adequate blockade of D2 receptors in the brain. The parsimonious options are that treatment resistance could arise through a failure of cognitive control over the dopaminergic dysfunction in the striatum; or has a different primary non-dopaminergic mechanism that isn’t targeted by current antipsychotics. Contemporary models suggest that schizophrenia is associated with reduced reward prediction errors (RPE) and consequent aberrant salience driven by increased dopamine levels that ‘drown out’ phasic signals. This causes positive symptoms and impaired reward learning. However, RPE signalling in treatment-resistant patients appears intact despite sub-optimal behavioural performance. It is therefore unclear how reward learning is impaired in these patients. Methods We investigated how reward learning is disrupted at the network level in 21 medicated treatment-responsive and 20 medicated treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia compared with 24 healthy controls (HC). Participants learnt to associate one of two emotional faces with a reward during a reinforcement learning task in an MRI scanner. Functional MRI BOLD signal was extracted from four brain regions (fusiform cortex, amygdala, caudate and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)) activated in response to face cues and RPEs. These formed a network of interacting brain regions supporting reward learning. Dynamic Causal Modelling assessed how effective connectivity between regions in this cortico-striatal-limbic network is disrupted in each patient group compared to HC. Connectivity was also examined with respect to symptoms and salience. Finally, cognitive control and the role of glutamate were assessed by relating top-down connectivity from the ACC with glutamate levels measured from the same region of the ACC. Results In responsive patients, there was enhanced top-down connectivity from the ACC to sensory regions (fusiform and amygdala) and reduced input to the caudate compared to HC. Increased top-down connectivity was inversely correlated with symptom severity and sensory-salience. This suggests the presence of an effective compensatory mechanism for unreliable sensory information in responsive patients. Resistant patients however showed normal network connectivity compared to HC except abnormal connectivity within the ACC. This supports an alternative, non-dopaminergic mechanism disrupting reward learning in this refractory group. Increasing connectivity from ACC to caudate was related to positive symptom severity and salience in this group. Moreover, ACC glutamate levels were related to key top-down connections in HC and responsive patients but were not related to any connections in resistant patients. This suggests that glutamate may not be modulating connectivity effectively in this network to exert cognitive control and update reward predictions. Discussion In summary, differential mechanisms underlie disrupted reward learning between responsive and resistant groups. Resistant patients show similar RPE signalling and network connectivity to HC suggesting their dopaminergic functioning is intact. Impaired glutamate function may present a key mechanism that disrupts reward learning – and why dopaminergic drugs are ineffective. This finding is important for developing new drugs (e.g. glutamatergic targets) and guiding treatment strategies (e.g. giving clozapine earlier) in resistant patients. Future research probing cognitive control mechanisms and glutamate function will be useful to elucidate this putative pathology in treatment resistance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 599-607
Author(s):  
Victor Olabowale Ikumawoyi ◽  
Chinagozim Kelechi Onyemaechi ◽  
Helen Olanike Orolugbagbe ◽  
Olufunsho Awodele ◽  
Esther Oluwatoyin Agbaje

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raly James Perez Custodio ◽  
Leandro Val Sayson ◽  
Chrislean Jun Botanas ◽  
Arvie Abiero ◽  
Kyung Yi You ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 2101-2118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Amato ◽  
Fabio Canneva ◽  
Paul Cumming ◽  
Simone Maschauer ◽  
Dominik Groos ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 963-973 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Sofia Beas ◽  
Brandon J. Wright ◽  
Miguel Skirzewski ◽  
Yan Leng ◽  
Jung Ho Hyun ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rahul Raghunath Bhalsinge ◽  
Rajbhoj Satkar ◽  
Sayan Das ◽  
Shraddha Yadav ◽  
Shah A. S. ◽  
...  

Background: There are interesting reports in the literature indicating relationship of smoking /nicotine and depression. Smokers use nicotine to treat depression. The objectives of present study were to evaluate the role of nicotine in depression through Dopaminergic mechanism by using haloperidol induced catalepsy model in rats and to estimate Dopamine level in brain of depressed rats after nicotine and imipramine.Methods: Dopaminergic activity was evaluated in haloperidol induced catalepsy in rats. Levels of dopamine in normal as well as in depressed rats brain was estimated using fluorimetric method. The study treatment were administered as follows - Vehicle (s.c.), Imipramine (i.p.) - 7days, Nicotine (subcutaneous), Nicotine (inhalation) were administered in a dose of 1ml/kg,10mg/kg,0.4mg/kg,0.2mg/kg respectively.Results: In haloperidol induced catalepsy model, vehicle treated group showed cataleptic effect starting at 1 hour and lasting for 6 hours. Nicotine administered by subcutaneous route significantly reduced cataleptic score as compared to vehicle treated group till 6 hours. Nicotine administered by inhalation route reduced cataleptic score up to 6 hours compared with that of vehicle. Catalepsy score in nicotine (inhalation) group was significantly less as compared to nicotine (subcutaneous) at all time points period except 2 hours. Isolation induced hyperactivity model was used to induce depression in rats. Dopamine levels in rats after isolation were significantly less as compared to normal rats (before isolation). After isolation, dopamine levels in imipramine treated rats were significantly higher as compared to vehicle treated group. After isolation, dopamine levels were significantly high in both groups i.e., nicotine (subcutaneous) and nicotine (inhalation). Imipramine (7 days) and single dose of nicotine (inhalation) showed comparable results with normal dopamine level i.e. before isolation rats.Conclusions: Nicotine has increased dopaminergic activity as evident by reversal of haloperidol induced catalepsy. Dopamine level reduced in depressed rats. Dopamine brain levels were increased, when depressed rats were treated with Imipramine (i.p.), nicotine (s.c.), nicotine(inhaled). Single dose nicotine given by inhalation route has produced significant antidepressant action comparable to that of seven days’ treatment of standard antidepressant drug imipramine in rats. In rats, nicotine by both routes i.e subcutaneous and inhalational increased dopaminergic activity.


2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raz Levin ◽  
Uriel Heresco-Levy ◽  
Shany Edelman ◽  
Haim Shapira ◽  
Richard P. Ebstein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document