A Transcanal Endoscopic Approach for Management of Pulsatile Tinnitus due to High-Riding Dehiscent Jugular Bulb

Pulsatile tinnitus (PT) caused by a high-riding dehiscence jugular bulb (HDJB) is a rare but treatable otology disease. There are several managements include transcatheter endovascular coil embolization, transvenous stent–assisted coil embolization, or resurfacing the dehiscent bony wall of high jugular bulb under the use of microscope. Among those options, surgical resurfacing of HDJB might be an effective and safe choice with less destruction. However, previous studies approached middle ear cavity via microscope can only provide a lateral, indirect view, while resurfacing the vessel through a transcanal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) approach may give surgeon a direct and easy way to manage HDJB. In this report, we presented a case of 40-year-old woman with HDJB and shared our clinical consideration and reasoning of the surgical management of PT via a transtympanic approach by TEES rather than a transmastoid approach.

Effect of High Jugular Bulb on the Hearing Loss Characteristics in Patients With LVAS: A Pilot Study

ObjectiveBoth large vestibular aqueduct syndrome (LVAS) and high jugular bulb (HJB) are regarded as abnormalities commonly seen on the temporal bone CT. High jugular bulb has been found to erode the vestibular aqueduct, and there are several studies on jugular bulb vestibular aqueduct dehiscence. However, there is no study that specifically reports LVAS with concurrent HJB and its hearing loss relatedness. This study presents the pure tone audiometry differences between LVAS with HJB, and LVAS without HJB.MethodsThis was a case control study involving 36 bilateral LVAS with concurrent unilateral HJB patients, total of 72 ears. Intra-person comparison was done, by dividing ears into two groups: the case group, 36 ears (LVAS with HJB); and the control group, 36 ears (LVAS without HJB). Air conduction thresholds (250–4000 Hz), bone conduction thresholds (250–1000 Hz), and air bone gap (250–1000 Hz) were analyzed and compared between groups.ResultThere were statistically significant differences in AC thresholds at 250, 500, 2000, and 4000 Hz between the groups, p < 0.05. But there was no statistical significant difference at 1000 Hz, p > 0.05. There were statistical significant differences in BC thresholds at 250 and 500 Hz, p < 0.05, but there was no statistical difference at 1000 Hz. There were no significant differences in air bone gap at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz between the two groups.ConclusionLVAS with concurrent HJB was found to have higher air conduction thresholds, especially at 250, 500, 2000, and 4000 Hz. Bone conduction thresholds were higher at 250 and 500 Hz. Air bone gap at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz, were not significantly higher in LVAS with concurrent HJB.

A case of jugular bulb diverticulum causing objective tinnitus

Anatomical anomalies of the jugular bulb include a high jugular bulb and deficiency of the cortical bone. Most cases are asymptomatic; however, they may present with tinnitus, hearing loss, dizziness. We encountered a rare case of jugular bulb diverticulum with deficiency of the cortical bone that caused objective tinnitus.

Cholesteatoma Surgery With a Dehiscent High Jugular Bulb Treated With Surgery Assisted With Underwater Endoscopy: A Case Report

A dehiscent high jugular bulb would be a pitfall in middle ear surgery especially for cholesteatoma. We report a case of cholesteatoma attached to a dehiscent high jugular bulb successfully treated with surgery assisted with underwater endoscopy. To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has reported a case of cholesteatoma with dehiscent high jugular bulb treated with surgery assisted with underwater endoscopy. Owing to the risk of jugular bulb injury, underwater endoscopy is a good indication for middle ear cases with a dehiscent high jugular bulb to obtain a clear operative field and avoid an unexpected air embolism.

Value of CT and three-dimensional reconstruction revealing specific radiological signs for screening causative high jugular bulb in patients with Menière's disease

BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to investigate the pathological features of vestibular aqueduct (VA) related high jugular bulb (HJB) and explore the possible cause-consequence relation between HJB and endolymphatic hydrops (EH), and the potential specific radiological signs for screening causative HJB in Meniere’s disease (MD).MethodsHigh-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) and three-dimensional reconstruction (3DRC) were used to detect the anatomical variables associated with VA and jugular bulb (JB) in hydropic and non-hydropic ears. The presence or absence of EH in the inner ear was determined by gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. The presence of different types of HJB, the anatomical variables of the VA and JB and the three types of anatomical relationship between the VA and HJB were compared between the hydropic and non-hydropic ears using the χ2 or Fisher’s exact tests. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.ResultsJB was classified as: Type 1, no bulb; type 2, below the inferior margin of the posterior semicircular canal (PSCC); type 3, between the inferior margin of the PSCC and the inferior margin of the internal auditory canal (IAC); type 4, above the inferior margin of the IAC. There were no significant differences in the presence of types 1, 2 and 3 JB between two groups. The presence of type 4 JB, average height of the JB and prevalence of the non-visualization of the VA in CT scans showed significant differences between two groups. The morphological pattern between the JB and VA revealing by 3DRC was classified as: Type I, the JB was not in contact with the VA; type II, the JB was in contact with the VA, but the latter was intact without obstruction; type III, the VA was obliterated by HJB encroachment. There were no significant differences in the presence of type I and II between two groups. Type III was identified in 5 hydropic ears but no non-hydropic ears, with a significant difference observed between the two groups.ConclusionThe present results showed that JB height and non-visualization of the VA on Pöschl's plane could render patients susceptible to the development of EH. A jugular bulb reaching above the inferior margin of the IAC (type 4 JB) could obstruct VA, resulting in EH in a few isolated patients with MD. VA obliteration revealed by 3DRC, as a specific radiological sign, may have the potential for screening causative HJB in MD.