correct statement
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

29
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 339
Author(s):  
Gwang-Hun Jeon ◽  
Philip Ayiku Dzagbletey ◽  
Jae-Young Chung

In the paper entitled “A Cross-Joint Vivaldi Antenna Pair for Dual-Pol and Broadband Testing Capabilities (Journal of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 201-209, 2021)”, the Acknowledgments has incorrect information. The correct statement should read.


Author(s):  
Sarmad Shafiq

: After research and extrapolation, I found that there are hadiths narrated by Abu Hilal Al-Rasbi in which there are defects and I wanted to collect and study these hadiths in this research and study them in a critical study in which I explain the places of the defect, whether in the chain of transmission or in the text. - Critical study -) "Marfu' and Mawqoof" Hadiths and so on. The differences were explained graduated and studied through the sayings of scholars (may God Almighty have mercy on them). The most correct statement was shown through strong clues indicating for that. The research was divided into an introduction and three topics. Then came the conclusion, the list of sources and references.


Author(s):  
Ji-Chao Li ◽  
Ji-Qiang Li

By investigation of movement of the Assur groups in normal connecting condition, and by inspection of the kinematic pair concept, the conclusions were found that “The freedom of Assur group is zero” in the Planar Mechanism Composition Principle conflicts with the fact that Assur group can move, and the external kinematic pairs of Assur group are inconsistent with the kinematic pair concept. Proposals were put forward then that the motion characteristics of Assur group should be studied in normal connecting conditions, Grade I Linkage Group should be introduced, and the PPP Type Linkage Group existence as an example was provided. Some new views were put forward in discussion of Planar Mechanism Composition Principle. And then an example of mechanism analysis was given to show that the correct statement of the Mechanism Composition Principle is helpful to solve mechanism analysis problems.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-327
Author(s):  
Jung-Hwan Lim ◽  
Jae Wook Lee ◽  
Taek-Kyung Lee ◽  
Hyeon-Cheol Lee ◽  
Sang-Gyu Lee ◽  
...  

In the paper entitled “Performance Evaluation of a Modified SweepSAR Mode for Quad-Pol Application in SAR Systems (<i>Journal of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science</i>, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 199-206, 2020)”, the Acknowledgments has incorrect information. The correct statement should read.


Author(s):  
Gabriel Galson ◽  
Brandy Karl

Through the standardized rights statements it provides, RightsStatements.org allows institutions to clearly communicate the copyright status of digitized cultural heritage works, promoting their reuse. However, it can be tricky for institutions to determine correct statement usage through the site without additional context. The Rights Statement Selection Tool [bit.ly/RSSTOOL] is an interactive infographic that serves to visually explain the statement selection workflow, allowing a copyright novice to identify the correct statement through decision tree alone. This legal tool lets cultural heritage institutions assign rights statement review work to non-experts, potentially increasing the number of items that can be evaluated. It’s meant to be integrated into cataloging workflows: clickable links lead to each statement’s URI page, and it can be viewed in a browser alongside the RightsStatements.org site. The Tool serves as a complete visual reference to the statements: each is covered and explained. It aggregates relevant resources and serves as a structural bridge between related copyright status determination charts and Creative Commons charts. Donation agreements–often a source of confusion for rights statements reviewers–are covered as well. The Tool is, by design, as agnostic to national law as possible. The US-centered copyright status determination charts that feed into it (such as the Hirtle and Sunstein charts) could easily be swapped for resources reflecting other countries’ national law; the RightsStatements.org logic that it covers would remain unchanged, and so would the chart. As the RightsStatements.org standard goes global, this tool can be translated, adapted, and re-used beyond the US.  


2018 ◽  
Vol 226 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-278
Author(s):  
Dr. Mohamed El Sayed ◽  
Dr. Fariz Abdullah Najem

          The research examined a recent study  "God created soil on Saturday " which is one of the ahaadeeth that the scholars differed in old and new, between this research the attitudes of scientists from talking and the Board with discussion and the correct statement, as well as it came with scientific benefits and accurate results and edited, and if we strive to reach our goal I hope to God that we have agreed to the good hopefully exalted.  


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 346
Author(s):  
Alrizni Nadia Febritianti

ABSTRACTThis paper analyzed the misuse of adverb repetition in words 再 zài and 又 yòu done by Second Year Student of Chinese Language Education Study at Christian University of Indonesia (UKI). Furthermore, this paper also shows the types of errors in using words 再 zài and 又 yòu and the factors that can trigger the misuse. This study use data from questionnaire that was voluntarily filled by fifteen participants of UKI college students.This study showed that the most common mistake often made by student were caused by the lack understanding of 再 zài and 又 yòu usage in a sentence. Most of the students have studied the usage of word 再 zài and 又 yòu but fail to implement it in a correct statement. As a result of this study, it is suggested for all second year students to be active in practicing adverb 再 zài and 又 yòu in a sentence. Moreover, every teacher is expected to help students in improving the use of adverb 再 zài and 又 yòu.Key Words: Chinese Language, Language Error, 再 zài and 又 yòu ABSTRAKTulisan ini membahas tentang kesalahan penggunaan kata keterangan pengulangan再zài dan又yòu dalam Bahasa Mandarin pada mahasiswa tingkat II prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Mandarin Universitas Kristen Indonesia. Selain itu dibahas juga jenis-jenis kesalahan penggunaan kata pengulangan再zài dan又yòu dan faktor-faktor yang menjadi penyebab terjadinya kesalahan. Dalam penelitian ini data dikumpulkan dari kuisioner yang telah diisi oleh 15 orang mahasiswa. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kesalahan yang banyak terjadi adalah mahasiswa kurang memahami penggunaan kata又yòu. Faktor utama penyebab kesalahannya adalah mahasiswa yang bersangkutan sudah pernah belajar tetapi masih tidak memahami cara penggunaan kata keterangan再zài dan又yòu dengan baik. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini disarankan agar mahasiswa dibantu oleh pengajar untuk lebih meningkatkan pembelajaran tentang kata keterangan pengulangan再zài dan又 agar pemahaman mahasiswa bisa lebih baik.Kata Kunci: Bahasa Mandarin, Kesalahan, Kata 再 zài dan 又 yòu.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. NP2-NP2

Dekker I, Sombekke, MH, Birgit, IW, et al. Asymptomatic spinal cord lesions do not predict the time to disability in patients with early multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. Epub ahead of print 6 November 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1352458517736147. In the initial Online First version of this article, the Funding statement was incomplete. The correct statement is below: Funding The author(s) declared receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article: The MS Centre Amsterdam is supported by the Dutch MS Research Foundation (grant number 14-358e). Frederik Barkhof (FB) is supported by the NIHR UCLH biomedical research centre. The online version of this article has been updated to reflect the correct declarations. Subsequent versions of the article will also be corrected. The authors apologise for this error and any confusion it may have caused.


2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. NP1-NP1

Wood, L., & McAteer, M. (in press). Levelling the playing fields in PAR: The intricacies of power, privilege, and participation in a university–community–school partnership. Adult Education Quarterly. [Epub ahead of print April 23, 2017] (Original DOI: 10.1177/0741713617706541 ) The funding statement declared in the initial OnlineFirst version of this article was incorrect. The correct statement appears below and in all subsequent versions. Funding The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was funded by a British Academy Newton Advanced Fellowship grant (AF150060).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document