Association of waist circumstance with long-term all-cause mortality and cardiac death in patients with a pacemaker

Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Objective To explore the association of abdominal obesity with long-term prognosis in patients with a pacemaker. Methods Patients in the Summit study were enrolled and divided into groups according to baseline waist circumference: with obesity, normal, and lean. Regular follow-up was performed. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoint was cardiac death. Results In total, 492 patients were included in the analysis. The average baseline waist circumference was 84.2 ± 12.7 cm, and abdominal obesity was observed in 37.6% of patients. During a mean follow-up of 67.2 ± 17.5 months,71 all-cause mortality (14.40%) and 24 cardiac death (4.87%) events occurred. All-cause mortality was associated with higher waist circumference (87.6 versus 83.6 cm, P = 0.014), but not body mass index (23.6 versus 23.5, P= 0.930). Multivariate Cox analysis showed compared with patients with abdominal obesity, lean patients had a significant survival benefit in both all-cause mortality (HR 0.188, 95%CI 0.070-0.505, P = 0.001) and cardiac death (HR 0.097, 95% CI 0.012-0.792, P = 0.029). Conclusions Waist circumference was associated with long-term all-cause mortality and cardiac death. Baseline waist circumference less than 80 cm for men and less than 75 cm for women had a significant survival benefit.

Prognostic value of ESR2 expression on adjuvant chemotherapy in completely resected NSCLC

Background Prognostic biomarker, which can inform the treatment outcome of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after complete resection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is urgently needed for the personalized treatment of these patients. Patients and methods The prognostic value of gene expression of the estrogen receptor (ER) on the effect of ACT in completely resected NSCLC was investigated in the present study. Two independent datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with a total of 309 patients were included in this study. The prognostic value of ER gene expression on ACT’s efficacy was evaluated by survival analysis and Cox hazards models. Results We found a consistent and significant prognostic value of ERβ (ESR2) expression for ACT’s efficacy in completely resected NSCLC in both of the two independent cohorts. After multivariate adjustment, a significant survival benefit of ACT was observed in patients with low expression of ESR2, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.19 (95%CI 0.05–0.82, p = 0.026) in the discovery cohort and an HR of 0.27 (95%CI 0.10–0.76, p = 0.012) in the validation group. No significant benefit of ACT in the subgroup of patients with high expression of ESR2 was observed, with an HR of 0.80 (95%CI 0.31–2.09, p = 0.644) in the discovery cohort and an HR of 1.05 (95%CI 0.48–2.29, p = 0.896) in the validation group. Conclusion A significant survival benefit from ACT was observed in patients with low ESR2 expression. No significant survival benefit was observed in patients with high ESR2 expression. Detection of ESR2 expression in NSCLC may help personalize its treatment after complete resection.

Correction to: Combining the differentiating effect of panobinostat with the apoptotic effect of arsenic trioxide leads to significant survival benefit in a model of t(8;21) acute myeloid leukemia

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

Limb salvage versus amputation in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities: an update in the modern era using the National Cancer Database

Background Historically, amputation was the primary surgical treatment for osteosarcoma of the extremities; however, with advancements in surgical techniques and chemotherapies limb salvage has replaced amputation as the dominant treatment paradigm. This study assessed the type of surgical resection chosen for osteosarcoma patients in the twenty-first century. Methods Utilizing the largest registry of primary osteosarcoma, the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we retrospectively analyzed patients with high grade osteosarcoma of the extremities from 2004 through 2015. Differences between patients undergoing amputation and patients undergoing limb salvage are described. Unadjusted five-year overall survival between patients who received limb salvage and amputation was assessed utilizing Kaplan Meier curves. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model and propensity matched analysis was used to determine the variables independently correlated with survival. Results From a total of 2442 patients, 1855 underwent limb salvage and 587 underwent amputation. Patients undergoing amputation were more likely to be older, male, uninsured, and live in zip codes associated with lower income. Patients undergoing amputation were also more likely to have larger tumors, more comorbid conditions, and metastatic disease at presentation. After controlling for confounders, limb salvage was associated with a significant survival benefit over amputation (HR: 0.70; p < 0.001). Although this may well reflect underlying biases impacting choice of treatment, this survival benefit remained significant after propensity matched analysis of all significantly different independent variables (HR: 0.71; p < 0.01). Conclusion Among patients in the NCDB, amputation for osteosarcoma is associated with advanced age, advanced stage, larger tumors, greater comorbidities, and lower income. Limb salvage is associated with a significant survival benefit, even when controlling for significant confounding variables and differences between cohorts.

MSCs Successfully Deliver Oncolytic Virotherapy to Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma

Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) is among the deadliest of pediatric brain tumors. Radiation therapy is the standard of care treatment for DIPG, but offers only transient relief of symptoms for DIPG patients without providing significant survival benefit. Oncolytic virotherapy (OV) is an anticancer treatment that has been investigated for treating various types of brain tumors. Here, we have explored the use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) for OV delivery and evaluated treatment efficacy using preclinical models of DIPG. Our results show that DIPG cells and tumors exhibit robust expression of cell surface proteins that are important for OV entry, and that MSCs loaded with OV disseminate within and release OV throughout the tumor in mice bearing DIPG brainstem xenografts. When combining administration of OV-loaded MSCs with radiotherapy, mice bearing brainstem DIPG xenografts experience a significant survival benefit, relative to that conferred by either therapy alone (p<0.0001). Our results support further preclinical investigation of cell-based OV therapy with radiation for potential translation in treating DIPG patients.

Impact of limb salvage versus amputation on overall survival in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremities: an update in the modern era using the National Cancer Database

Background: Historically, amputation was the primary surgical treatment for osteosarcoma of the extremities; however, with advancements in surgical techniques and chemotherapies limb salvage has replaced amputation as the dominant treatment paradigm. This study assessed the impact of the type of surgical resection on overall survival in the era of modern limb salvage. Methods: Utilizing the largest registry of primary osteosarcoma, the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we retrospectively analyzed patients with high grade osteosarcoma of the extremities from 2004 through 2015. Unadjusted five-year overall survival between patients who received limb salvage and amputation was assessed utilizing Kaplan Meier curves. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model and propensity matched analysis was used to determine the variables independently correlated with survival. Results: From a total of 3,421 patients, 2,634 underwent limb salvage and 787 underwent amputation. After controlling for confounders, limb salvage was associated with a significant survival benefit over amputation (HR: 0.70; p<0.001). This survival benefit remained significant after propensity matched analysis of all significantly different independent variables (HR: 0.74; p=0.001). Chemotherapy and negative surgical margins were also independently associated with survival.Conclusion: Limb salvage is associated with a significant survival benefit over amputation, even when controlling for potentially confounding variables and differences between cohorts.

Assessment of Prognostic Value of Cystic Features in Glioblastoma Relative to Sex and Treatment with Standard-of-Care

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor and can have cystic components, identifiable through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Previous studies suggest that cysts occur in 7-23% of GBMs and report mixed results regarding their prognostic impact. Using our retrospective cohort of 493 patients with first-diagnosis GBM, we carried out an exploratory analysis on this potential link between cystic GBM and survival. Using pretreatment MRIs, we manually identified 88 patients with GBM that had a significant cystic component at presentation and 405 patients that did not. Patients with cystic GBM had significantly longer overall survival and were significantly younger at presentation. Within patients who received the current standard of care (SOC) (N=184, 40 cystic), we did not observe a survival benefit of cystic GBM. Unexpectedly, we did not observe a significant survival benefit between this SOC cystic cohort and patients with cystic GBM diagnosed before the standard was established (N=40 with SOC, N=19 without SOC); this significant SOC benefit was clearly observed in patients with noncystic GBM (N=144 with SOC, N=111 without SOC). When stratified by sex, this significant survival benefit was only preserved in male patients (N=303, 47 cystic). We report differences in the absolute and relative sizes of imaging abnormalities on MRI and the prognostic implication of cysts based on sex. We discuss hypotheses for these differences, including the possibility that the presence of a cyst could indicate a less aggressive tumor.

Combined Retro- and Prospective Analysis of Adherence to Guidelines and Patient-Tailored Therapeutic Recommendations in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) at a Tertiary Care Centre

Introduction The effect of adherence to treatment guidelines has not yet been evaluated in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Based on the large Düsseldorf MDS Registry, we explored adherence to European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines as well as MDS expert recommendations in clinical routine. Methods In a preliminary retrospective analysis of 1658 patients documented in the Düsseldorf MDS registry, we reviewed if treatment was in accordance with the published ELN guidelines from 2014. The following treatments were considered: erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA), iron chelation, Lenalidomide, hypomethylating agents (HMA), intensive chemotherapy, and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Since patients were diagnosed between 1982 and 2018, clinical decision-making could not be exclusively based on current guidelines. Therefore, we also performed a prospective analysis of 381 patients who received patient-tailored treatment recommendations, considering, IPSS-R, MDS-CI, HCT-CI, distance to our center, and ELN guidelines, with special attention to the above-mentioned treatment options. In addition, we conducted a matched-pair analysis, comparing patients who received a certain treatment with patients who, though eligible, did not receive it. Information regarding adherence to treatment recommendations was obtained by searching medical files and contacting primary care physicians. Probability of survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The retrospective cohort was followed for a median of 22 months (1-500 months). Patients treated in accordance with the ELN guideline did not gain a significant survival benefit in the subgroups treated with ESA, iron chelation, Lenalidomide, HMA, and intensive chemotherapy, compared to patients who were eligible for the respective treatment but did not receive it. Solely the group of patients undergoing alloSCT derived a significant survival benefit compared to patients not receiving alloSCT despite qualifying for this treatment according to ELN criteria (30 vs 18 months, p=0.011, 95% CI 16.86; 25.14, fig. 1). The prospective cohort was followed for a median of 14 months (1-195 months). A median of four months elapsed before treatment was started. Non-adherence to patient-tailored therapeutic recommendations was found in 33% of the patients. The proportion of non-adherence was higher for intensive chemotherapy (47%) and lowest for patients receiving supportive treatment (13%) like ESA and chelation therapy. In the prospective group, the matched-pair study showed again that patients receiving ESA, iron chelation, Lenalidomide, HMA or intensive chemotherapy did not gain a significant survival benefit from adherence to the respective treatment recommendations. Again, survival only differed between patients adhering to and patients not adhering to a recommendation for alloSCT (median survival of 74 vs 28 months; 95% CI 7.5; 48.5, p=0.015). Conclusions According to current ELN guidelines, 33% of patients did not receive the treatment they were eligible for. Non-adherence to patient-tailored treatment recommendations from our tertiary referral center was found in 33% of the patients. Based on our two patient cohorts, supportive care regimens, Lenalidomide, HMA, as well as intensive chemotherapy do not appear to improve overall survival, whereas allogeneic stem cell transplantation provided a significant survival benefit in both groups. In summary, while adherence to MDS treatment guidelines and expert recommendations may influence survival in some of the patients, the overall effect appears to be limited, owing to the limited efficacy of the available treatment options, with the notable exception of alloSCT. However, we cannot exclude that adherence to treatment recommendations has an effect on other relevant outcomes such as quality of life or frequency of hospitalisations due to infections, bleeding and cardiovascular events. Finally, a systematic and standardized assessment of guideline-adherence, reasons for non-adherence, and impact on relevant outcomes would be desirable because it would support us in monitoring the quality of care of MDS patients and would allow comparisons to be made between different health economic environments. Disclosures Nachtkamp: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Celgene: Other: Travel Support. Schroeder:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kobbe:Amgen: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Neovii: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Biotest: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Jazz: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Medac: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; MSD: Honoraria, Other: Travel support; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Travel support. Kündgen:Otsuka: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Novartis: Honoraria. Kaivers:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel Support. Rautenberg:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel Support; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support. Gattermann:Novartis: Honoraria; Alexion: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Bonadies:Novartis: Other: financial support for travel, Research Funding; Roche: Other: financial support for travel, Research Funding; Amgen: Other: financial support for travel; Celgene: Other: financial support for travel, Research Funding; Sanofi Genzyme: Other: financial support for travel; Janssen: Other: financial support for travel. Germing:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria.

RARE-09. CYSTIC GLIOBLASTOMA PRESENTATION AS A BENEFICIAL PROGNOSTIC INDICATOR FOR OVERALL SURVIVAL

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor with a median overall survival of 15 months with standard-of-care treatment. GBM patients sometimes present with a cystic component, which can be identified through magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Previous studies suggest that cysts occur in 7–22% of GBM patients and have reported mixed results regarding whether cystic GBM have a survival benefit compared to noncystic GBM. Using our large retrospective cohort of 493 first-diagnosis GBM patients, we aim to elucidate this link between cystic GBM and survival. Within this cohort, 88 patients had a significant cystic component at presentation as identified on MRI. Compared to noncystic GBM (n=405), cystic GBM patients had significantly better overall survival (15 vs 22 months median, log-rank, p=0.001) and were significantly younger at the time of presentation (t-test, p=0.002). However, within patients that received current standard-of-care treatment (n=184), cystic GBM (n=40) was not as beneficial for outcome (22 vs 25 months, log-rank, p=0.3). We also did not observe a significant survival benefit when comparing this standard-of-care cystic cohort to cystic GBM patients diagnosed before the standard was established (n=19, 25 vs 23 months, log-rank, p=0.3), but the analogous result for noncystic GBM patients gives a sizeable benefit, as expected (n=144, n=111, respectively, 22 vs 12 months, log-rank p < 0.0001). Together, these results on current standard-of-care may explain later studies that note no significant survival benefit for cystic GBM patients receiving current standard-of-care. We also report differences in the absolute and relative sizes of imaging abnormalities on MRI and in prognostic impact of cysts based on sex. We discuss current hypotheses for these observed differences, including the possibility that the presence of a cyst could be indicative of a less aggressive tumor.