electronic medication administration
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

44
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Nursing Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda R. Gregory ◽  
Rimen Lim ◽  
Lois MacCullagh ◽  
Therese Riley ◽  
Karen Tuqiri ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (05) ◽  
pp. 812-820
Author(s):  
Magdalena Z. Raban ◽  
Melissa T. Baysari ◽  
Mikaela L. Jorgensen ◽  
Amina Tariq ◽  
Andrew Georgiou ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Transdermal medication patches have caused serious adverse events in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Preliminary research suggests that facilities are using a workaround consisting of manually entered reminders in their electronic medication administration records (eMARs) to prompt staff to check and remove patches, because the eMAR does not support these tasks. However, the prevalence and factors associated with use of this workaround among facilities is unknown. Objectives The objectives of this study were to (1) examine the frequency and consistency with which manual reminders to check and remove transdermal patches were used in facility eMARs, and (2) identify resident and facility factors associated with reminder use, to inform eMAR redesign. Methods This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of eMAR data from 66 Australian RACFs including 4,787 permanent residents, aged ≥65 years in January 2017. Prevalence of the use of reminders to check and remove patches, and consistency in their application within facilities were examined. Generalized estimating equations were used to determine factors associated with use of manual reminders. Results One in five (n = 937) residents used a patch, and 83.6% of patches contained opioids, a high-risk medicine. 56.9% of facilities implemented manually entered check patch reminders in the eMAR, and 72.3% implemented remove reminders. The reminders were applied inconsistently, with only half of these facilities having reminders for all residents with patches. Residents in facilities in regional areas were more likely to have a check reminder compared with those in major cities (adjusted odds ratio = 4.72 [95% confidence interval: 1.69–13.20]). Conclusion Transdermal patches containing high-risk medicines are frequently used in RACFs, but their safe administration is not supported by a widely implemented eMAR. The frequent, but inconsistent use of a workaround to manually enter reminders indicates an unmet need for new eMAR functionality to improve safety.


Author(s):  
Ryan Chan ◽  
Richard Booth ◽  
Gillian Strudwick ◽  
Barbara Sinclair

AbstractMedication errors continue to be a significant issue, posing substantial threats to the safety and well-being of patients. Through Bandura’s theory of self-efficacy, nursing students’ self-efficacy (confidence) related to medication administration was examined to investigate its influence on the generation of medication errors with the use of an Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) in clinical simulation. This study examined the generation of medication errors and the differences that may exist based on nursing students’ perceived confidence. The findings of this study demonstrated that nursing students continue to generate medication errors within clinical simulation. No differences in the generation of medication errors were found between nursing students with perceived high levels of confidence and those with perceived low levels of confidence (one exception noted). Further examination of the variables and contextual factors related to safe medication administration practices is required to inform nursing education and practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document