synthetic biology open language
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

30
(FIVE YEARS 14)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Falk Schreiber ◽  
Padraig Gleeson ◽  
Martin Golebiewski ◽  
Thomas E. Gorochowski ◽  
Michael Hucka ◽  
...  

Abstract This special issue of the Journal of Integrative Bioinformatics contains updated specifications of COMBINE standards in systems and synthetic biology. The 2021 special issue presents four updates of standards: Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual Version 2.3, Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual Version 3.0, Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language Level 1 Version 4, and OMEX Metadata specification Version 1.2. This document can also be consulted to identify the latest specifications of all COMBINE standards.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Baig ◽  
Pedro Fontanarossa ◽  
James McLaughlin ◽  
James Scott-Brown ◽  
Prashant Vaidyanathan ◽  
...  

Abstract People who engineer biological organisms often find it useful to draw diagrams in order to communicate both the structure of the nucleic acid sequences that they are engineering and the functional relationships between sequence features and other molecular species. Some typical practices and conventions have begun to emerge for such diagrams. SBOL Visual aims to organize and systematize such conventions in order to produce a coherent language for expressing the structure and function of genetic designs. This document details version 3.0 of SBOL Visual, a new major revision of the standard. The major difference between SBOL Visual 3 and SBOL Visual 2 is that diagrams and glyphs are defined with respect to the SBOL 3 data model rather than the SBOL 2 data model. A byproduct of this change is that the use of dashed undirected lines for subsystem mappings has been removed, pending future determination on how to represent general SBOL 3 constraints; in the interim, this annotation can still be used as an annotation. Finally, deprecated material has been removed from collection of glyphs: the deprecated “insulator” glyph and “macromolecule” alternative glyphs have been removed, as have the deprecated BioPAX alternatives to SBO terms.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlie J Clark ◽  
James Scott-Brown ◽  
Thomas E Gorochowski

Abstract Diagrams constructed from standardized glyphs are central to communicating complex design information in many engineering fields. For example, circuit diagrams are commonplace in electronics and allow for a suitable abstraction of the physical system that helps support the design process. With the development of the Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual (SBOLv), bioengineers are now positioned to better describe and share their biological designs visually. However, development of computational tools to support the creation of these diagrams is currently hampered by an excessive burden in maintenance due to the large and expanding number of glyphs present in the standard. Here, we present a Python package called paraSBOLv that enables access to the full suite of SBOLv glyphs through use of machine-readable parametric glyph definitions. These greatly simplify the rendering process while allowing extensive customization of the resulting diagrams. We demonstrate how adoption of paraSBOLv can accelerate the development of highly specialized biodesign visualization tools or even form the basis for more complex software by removing the burden of maintaining glyph specific rendering code. Looking forward, we suggest that incorporation of machine-readable parametric glyph definitions into the SBOLv standard could further simplify the development of tools to produce standard-compliant diagrams and integration of visual standards across fields.


2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Baig ◽  
Pedro Fontanarossa ◽  
Vishwesh Kulkarni ◽  
James McLaughlin ◽  
Prashant Vaidyanathan ◽  
...  

Abstract People who are engineering biological organisms often find it useful to communicate in diagrams, both about the structure of the nucleic acid sequences that they are engineering and about the functional relationships between sequence features and other molecular species. Some typical practices and conventions have begun to emerge for such diagrams. The Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual (SBOL Visual) has been developed as a standard for organizing and systematizing such conventions in order to produce a coherent language for expressing the structure and function of genetic designs. This document details version 2.3 of SBOL Visual, which builds on the prior SBOL Visual 2.2 in several ways. First, the specification now includes higher-level “interactions with interactions,” such as an inducer molecule stimulating a repression interaction. Second, binding with a nucleic acid backbone can be shown by overlapping glyphs, as with other molecular complexes. Finally, a new “unspecified interaction” glyph is added for visualizing interactions whose nature is unknown, the “insulator” glyph is deprecated in favor of a new “inert DNA spacer” glyph, and the polypeptide region glyph is recommended for showing 2A sequences.


Author(s):  
James Alastair McLaughlin ◽  
Jacob Beal ◽  
Göksel Mısırlı ◽  
Raik Grünberg ◽  
Bryan A. Bartley ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 2410-2417
Author(s):  
Bradley Brown ◽  
Bryan Bartley ◽  
Jacob Beal ◽  
Jasmine E. Bird ◽  
Ángel Goñi-Moreno ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2-3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Baig ◽  
Pedro Fontanarrosa ◽  
Vishwesh Kulkarni ◽  
James Alastair McLaughlin ◽  
Prashant Vaidyanathan ◽  
...  

AbstractSynthetic biology builds upon genetics, molecular biology, and metabolic engineering by applying engineering principles to the design of biological systems. When designing a synthetic system, synthetic biologists need to exchange information about multiple types of molecules, the intended behavior of the system, and actual experimental measurements. The Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) has been developed as a standard to support the specification and exchange of biological design information in synthetic biology, following an open community process involving both wet bench scientists and dry scientific modelers and software developers, across academia, industry, and other institutions. This document describes SBOL 3.0.0, which condenses and simplifies previous versions of SBOL based on experiences in deployment across a variety of scientific and industrial settings. In particular, SBOL 3.0.0, (1) separates sequence features from part/sub-part relationships, (2) renames Component Definition/Component to Component/Sub-Component, (3) merges Component and Module classes, (4) ensures consistency between data model and ontology terms, (5) extends the means to define and reference Sub-Components, (6) refines requirements on object URIs, (7) enables graph-based serialization, (8) moves Systems Biology Ontology (SBO) for Component types, (9) makes all sequence associations explicit, (10) makes interfaces explicit, (11) generalizes Sequence Constraints into a general structural Constraint class, and (12) expands the set of allowed constraints.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2-3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Baig ◽  
Pedro Fontanarrosa ◽  
Vishwesh Kulkarni ◽  
James McLaughlin ◽  
Prashant Vaidyanathan ◽  
...  

AbstractPeople who are engineering biological organisms often find it useful to communicate in diagrams, both about the structure of the nucleic acid sequences that they are engineering and about the functional relationships between sequence features and other molecular species. Some typical practices and conventions have begun to emerge for such diagrams. The Synthetic Biology Open Language Visual (SBOL Visual) has been developed as a standard for organizing and systematizing such conventions in order to produce a coherent language for expressing the structure and function of genetic designs. This document details version 2.2 of SBOL Visual, which builds on the prior SBOL Visual 2.1 in several ways. First, the grounding of molecular species glyphs is changed from BioPAX to SBO, aligning with the use of SBO terms for interaction glyphs. Second, new glyphs are added for proteins, introns, and polypeptide regions (e. g., protein domains), the prior recommended macromolecule glyph is deprecated in favor of its alternative, and small polygons are introduced as alternative glyphs for simple chemicals.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 962-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Crowther ◽  
Lewis Grozinger ◽  
Matthew Pocock ◽  
Christopher P. D. Taylor ◽  
James A. McLaughlin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Göksel Misirli ◽  
Jacob Beal ◽  
Thomas E. Gorochowski ◽  
Guy-Bart Stan ◽  
Anil Wipat ◽  
...  

AbstractStandardising the visual representation of genetic parts and circuits is vital for unambiguously creating and interpreting genetic designs. To this end, an increasing number of tools are adopting well-defined glyphs from the Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) Visual standard to represent various genetic parts and their relationships. However, the implementation and maintenance of the relationships between biological elements or concepts and their associated glyphs has to now been left up to tool developers. We address this need with the SBOL Visual 2 Ontology, a machine-accessible resource that provides rules for mapping from genetic parts, molecules, and interactions between them, to agreed SBOL Visual glyphs. This resource, together with a web service, can be used as a library to simplify the development of visualization tools, as a stand-alone resource to computationally search for suitable glyphs, and to help facilitate integration with existing biological ontologies and standards in synthetic biology.Graphical TOC Entry


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document