edge weighting
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

55
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Marinos Poiitis ◽  
Athena Vakali ◽  
Nicolas Kourtellis

Aggression in online social networks has been studied mostly from the perspective of machine learning, which detects such behavior in a static context. However, the way aggression diffuses in the network has received little attention as it embeds modeling challenges. In fact, modeling how aggression propagates from one user to another is an important research topic, since it can enable effective aggression monitoring, especially in media platforms, which up to now apply simplistic user blocking techniques. In this article, we address aggression propagation modeling and minimization in Twitter, since it is a popular microblogging platform at which aggression had several onsets. We propose various methods building on two well-known diffusion models, Independent Cascade ( IC ) and Linear Threshold ( LT ), to study the aggression evolution in the social network. We experimentally investigate how well each method can model aggression propagation using real Twitter data, while varying parameters, such as seed users selection, graph edge weighting, users’ activation timing, and so on. It is found that the best performing strategies are the ones to select seed users with a degree-based approach, weigh user edges based on their social circles’ overlaps, and activate users according to their aggression levels. We further employ the best performing models to predict which ordinary real users could become aggressive (and vice versa) in the future, and achieve up to AUC = 0.89 in this prediction task. Finally, we investigate aggression minimization by launching competitive cascades to “inform” and “heal” aggressors. We show that IC and LT models can be used in aggression minimization, providing less intrusive alternatives to the blocking techniques currently employed by Twitter.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Kosmatopoulos ◽  
Kostas Loumponias ◽  
Despoina Chatzakou ◽  
Theodora Tsikrika ◽  
Stefanos Vrochidis ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 107-126
Author(s):  
Xuding Zhu ◽  
R. Balakrishnan
Keyword(s):  

: An k-edge-weighting of a graph G = (V, E) is a mapping : E(G) {1, 2, 3, ...k}, where k is a positive integer. The sum of the edge-weighting appearing on the edges incident at the vertex v under the edge-weighting and is denoted by (v). An k edge-weighting of G is a coprime irregular edge-weighting if gcd ( (u), (v)) = 1 for every pair of adjacent vertices u and v in G. A graph G admits a coprime irregular edge-weighting is called a coprime irregular graph. In this paper, we discuss the coprime irregular edge-weighting for some special classes of graphs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (04) ◽  
pp. 3874-3881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria Fionda ◽  
Giuseppe Pirrò

Graph embedding techniques allow to learn high-quality feature vectors from graph structures and are useful in a variety of tasks, from node classification to clustering. Existing approaches have only focused on learning feature vectors for the nodes and predicates in a knowledge graph. To the best of our knowledge, none of them has tackled the problem of directly learning triple embeddings. The approaches that are closer to this task have focused on homogeneous graphs involving only one type of edge and obtain edge embeddings by applying some operation (e.g., average) on the embeddings of the endpoint nodes. The goal of this paper is to introduce Triple2Vec, a new technique to directly embed knowledge graph triples. We leverage the idea of line graph of a graph and extend it to the context of knowledge graphs. We introduce an edge weighting mechanism for the line graph based on semantic proximity. Embeddings are finally generated by adopting the SkipGram model, where sentences are replaced with graph walks. We evaluate our approach on different real-world knowledge graphs and compared it with related work. We also show an application of triple embeddings in the context of user-item recommendations.


Author(s):  
Stuart Oldham ◽  
Aurina Arnatkevic̆iūtė ◽  
Robert E. Smith ◽  
Jeggan Tiego ◽  
Mark A. Bellgrove ◽  
...  

AbstractHead motion is a major confounding factor in neuroimaging studies. While numerous studies have investigated how motion impacts estimates of functional connectivity, the effects of motion on structural connectivity measured using diffusion MRI have not received the same level of attention, despite the fact that, like functional MRI, diffusion MRI relies on elaborate preprocessing pipelines that require multiple choices at each step. Here, we report a comprehensive analysis of how these choices influence motion-related contamination of structural connectivity estimates. Using a healthy adult sample (N = 252), we evaluated 240 different preprocessing pipelines, devised using plausible combinations of different choices related to explicit head motion correction, tractography propagation algorithms, track seeding methods, track termination constraints, quantitative metrics derived for each connectome edge, and parcellations. We found that an approach to motion correction that includes outlier replacement and within-slice volume correction led to a dramatic reduction in cross-subject correlations between head motion and structural connectivity strength, and that motion contamination is more severe when quantifying connectivity strength using mean tract fractional anisotropy rather than streamline count. We also show that the choice of preprocessing strategy can significantly influence subsequent inferences about network organization, with the location of network hubs varying considerably depending on the specific preprocessing steps applied. Our findings indicate that the impact of motion on structural connectivity can be successfully mitigated using recent motion-correction algorithms that include outlier replacement and within-slice motion correction.HighlightsWe assess how motion affects structural connectivity in 240 preprocessing pipelinesMotion contamination of structural connectivity depends on preprocessing choicesAdvanced motion correction tools reduce motion confoundsFA edge weighting is more susceptible to motion effects than streamline count


An k−edge-weighting of a graph G = (V,E) is a map 𝝋: 𝑬(𝑮) → {𝟏,𝟐,𝟑, . . . 𝒌}, }where 𝒌 ≥ 𝟏 is an integer. Denote 𝑺𝝋(𝒗) is the sum of edge-weights appearing on the edges incident at the vertex v under𝝋 . An k-edge -weighting of G is equitable irregular if |𝑺𝝋(𝒖) − 𝑺𝝋(𝒗)| ≤ 𝟏, for every pair of adjacent vertices u and v in G. The equitable irregular strength 𝑺𝒆 (𝑮) of an equitable irregular graph G is the smallest positive integer k such that there is a k-edge weighting of G. In this paper, we discuss the equitable irregular edge-weighting for some classes of graphs


An l-edge-weighting of a graph G is a map : E(G) {1, 2, 3, … l}, where l is a positive integer. For a vertex v V(G), the weight (v) is the sum of edge-weights appearing on the edges incident at v under the edge-weighting . An l-edge-weighting of G is coprime irregular edge-weighting of G if gcd( (u), (v)) = 1 for every pair of adjacent vertices u and v in G. A graph G is coprime irregular if G admits a coprime irregular edge-weighting. In this paper, we discuss this new irregular edge weighting of graphs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document