electrolytic refining
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

70
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
pp. 331-359
Author(s):  
Mark E. Schlesinger ◽  
Kathryn C. Sole ◽  
William G. Davenport ◽  
Gerardo R.F. Alvear Flores

Author(s):  
AsbjØrn Solheim ◽  
Ole S. Kjos ◽  
Henrik Gudbrandsen ◽  
Egil Skybakmoen

AbstractCurrently, recycled metal is diluted with primary metal to keep the concentration of alloying elements within specification. This will be more difficult in the future, when a larger proportion of the metal is made from scrap. Particularly, there is a need for a process that can remove elements more noble than aluminum from the scrap metal. While electrolytic refining in a three-layer cell (the Hoopes process) is a possibility; the present paper presents a simpler and more flexible electrolysis cell where the anode metal (alloy) and the cathode metal (purified metal) are placed side-by-side. The principle was demonstrated in a laboratory cell. The current efficiency was above 80 pct and the specific energy consumption was about 7 kWh/kg Al. The refining effect was very good, e.g., the copper content in the 7xxx alloy used was reduced from 2.1 wt pct to less than 20 ppm. An industrial version of the cell used in the present work is suggested. The principles and design are generic and can be used for other purposes than recycling aluminum.


Metals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 515
Author(s):  
Wei-Sheng Chen ◽  
Shota Mesaki ◽  
Cheng-Han Lee

Tin anode slime is a by-product of the tin electrolytic refining process. This study investigated a route to separate Sn, Sb, Bi, and Cu from tin anode slime after leaching with hydrochloric acid. In the solvent extraction process with tributyl phosphate, Sb and Sn were extracted into the organic phase. Bi and Cu were unextracted and remained in the liquid phase. In the stripping experiment, Sb and Sn were stripped and separated with HCl and HNO3. Bi and Cu in the aqueous phase were also separated with chemical precipitation procedure by controlling pH value. The purities of Sn, Sb, Cu solution and the Bi-containing solid were 96.25%, 83.65%, 97.51%, and 92.1%. The recovery rates of Sn, Sb, Cu, and Bi were 76.2%, 67.1%, and 96.2% and 92.4%.


Metallurgist ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1198-1207
Author(s):  
E. N. Selivanov ◽  
S. V. Sergeeva ◽  
A. A. Korolev ◽  
K. L. Timofeev ◽  
S. A. Krayukhin ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 21-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lifeng Ding ◽  
Jun Cheng ◽  
Tong Wang ◽  
Junliang Zhao ◽  
Chongyan Chen ◽  
...  

Energies ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 3356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung Eun Park ◽  
Seung Kyu Yang ◽  
Ji Hyun Kim ◽  
Mi-Jung Park ◽  
Eun Sil Lee

This study compared the electrolytic refining process using different commercial Pd-based electrodes. The Pd-based electrode had an Ir:Sn molar ratio of 1:1 and contained 10% tantalum on a titanium substrate. The palladium weight ratio varied from 0 g to 1.8 g, 4.7 g, 8.6 g, and 15.4 g. Electrolytic refining was investigated for the Pd-based electrode in 3 M of H2SO4. The interfacial microstructure and components of the substrate were investigated using energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, and the electrochemical properties of the materials were measured using cyclic voltammetry, linear scan voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, and accelerated life tests. Of all the tested Pd-based electrodes, those with a palladium loading weight of 8.6 g showed the highest and most stable electrode activity at 3 M of H2SO4, with a capacitance retention of 96% of its initial value. The accelerated life test results for the 8.6 g Pd-Ir-Sn-Ta/TiO2 electrode showed a gradual slope with an efficiency of almost 100% at 1000 h in an aqueous solution of 3 M of H2SO4. After the test, the dissolved elements that caused resistance in the electrolyte increased with increasing palladium loading content. Thus, the 8.6 g Pd-Ir-Sn-Ta/TiO2 electrode demonstrated the optimum composition in 3 M of H2SO4 for electrolyte refining.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavel Arkhipov ◽  
Yury Zaykov ◽  
Yulia Khalimullina ◽  
Anna Kholkina

2017 ◽  
pp. 44-49
Author(s):  
Yu. T. Melnikov ◽  
◽  
E. D. Kravtsova ◽  
D. O. Krinitsyn ◽  
◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document