monophasic action potentials
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

133
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

26
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 321
Author(s):  
Julian Wolfes ◽  
Christian Ellermann ◽  
Niklas Broer ◽  
Benjamin Rath ◽  
Kevin Willy ◽  
...  

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a combination of ranolazine with different selective inhibitors of the Na+/Ca2+-exchanger (NCX) in an established experimental model of atrial fibrillation (AF). Eighteen hearts of New Zealand white rabbits were retrogradely perfused. Atrial catheters were used to record monophasic action potentials (aPRR). Hearts were paced at three different cycle lengths. Thereby, atrial action potential durations (aAPD90), atrial effective refractory periods (aERP) and atrial post-repolarization refractoriness were obtained. Isoproterenol and acetylcholine were employed to increase the occurrence of AF. Thereafter, the hearts were assigned to two groups (n = 9 each group) and additionally perfused with a combination of 10 µM ranolazine and 1 µM of the selective NCX-inhibitor ORM-10103 (group A: Rano-ORM) or 10 µM ranolazine and 1 µM of another NCX-inhibitor, SEA0400 (group B: Rano-SEA). The infusion of Iso/ACh led to a shortening of aAPD90, aERP, aPRR and the occurrence of AF episodes was significantly increased. Additional perfusion with ranolazine and ORM-10103 (group A) significantly prolonged the refractory periods and aPRR and AF episodes were effectively reduced. In group B, Rano-SEA led to a slight decrease in aAPD90 while aERP and aPRR were prolonged. The occurrence of AF episodes was consecutively reduced. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the effect of ranolazine combined with different selective NCX-inhibitors in an isolated whole-heart model of AF. Both combinations prolonged aERP and aPRR and thereby suppressed the induction of AF.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariusz Marciszek ◽  
Aleksandra Paterek ◽  
Marta Oknińska ◽  
Urszula Mackiewicz ◽  
Michał Mączewski

Abstract Ventricular arrhythmias are a major source of early mortality in acute myocardial infarction (MI) and remain a major therapeutic challenge. Thus we investigated effects of ivabradine, a presumably specific bradycardic agent versus metoprolol, a β-blocker, at doses offering the same heart rate (HR) reduction, on ventricular arrhythmias in the acute non-reperfused MI in the rat. Immediately after MI induction a single dose of ivabradine/ metoprolol was given. ECG was continuously recorded and ventricular arrhythmias were analyzed. After 6 h epicardial monophasic action potentials (MAPs) were recorded and cardiomyocyte Ca2+ handling was assessed. Both ivabradine and metoprolol reduced HR by 17% and arrhythmic mortality (14% and 19%, respectively, versus 33% in MI, p < 0.05) and ventricular arrhythmias in post-MI rats. Both drugs reduced QTc prolongation and decreased sensitivity of ryanodine receptors in isolated cardiomyocytes, but otherwise had no effect on Ca2+ handling, velocity of conduction or repolarization. We did not find any effects of potential IKr inhibition by ivabradine in this setting. Thus Ivabradine is an equally effective antiarrhythmic agent as metoprolol in early MI in the rat. It could be potentially tested as an alternative antiarrhythmic agent in acute MI when β-blockers are contraindicated.


2020 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 460-469
Author(s):  
Shahriar Iravanian ◽  
Ilija Uzelac ◽  
Conner Herndon ◽  
Jonathan J. Langberg ◽  
Flavio H. Fenton

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Frommeyer ◽  
S Baeumer ◽  
C Ellermann ◽  
L Eckardt

Abstract Background Clinical and experimental data suggest potential deleterious effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) in cardiac disease. The aim of the present study was to characterize potential direct arrhythmogenic effects of ibuprofen or indometacin on cardiac electrophysiology. Methods and results In 13 isolated rabbit hearts, indometacin was administered in increasing concentrations (10, 30 and 50μM) after obtaining baseline data. In further 13 hearts, ibuprofen was infused (10, 30 and 50μM). Eight endo- and epicardial monophasic action potentials and a simultaneously recorded 12-lead ECG showed a significant decrease of QT-interval in indometacin- (50μM: −60ms, p<0.05) and ibuprofen-treated hearts (50μM: −81ms, p<0.01). This was accompanied by a similar decrease of action potential duration (APD). Effective refractory period (ERP) was also reduced by indometacin (−24ms, p<0.05) and ibuprofen (−22ms, p<0.05) while spatial dispersion of repolarisation remained stable with both drugs. Programmed ventricular stimulation and burst stimulation were employed for provocation of ventricular arrhythmias. In the indomethacin group 7 episodes of ventricular arrhythmias were inducible at baseline. The incidence was increased to 22 (10μM), 37 (30μM) and 51 (50μM) with higher concentrations of indometacin. In the ibuprofen group 15 episodes were inducible at baseline. After infusion of 10μM ibuprofen, also 15 episodes of ventricular arrhythmias occurred while 34 episodes were inducible with 30μM ibuprofen. Conclusion Infusion of the NSAID ibuprofen and indometacin resulted in a significant abbreviation of myocardial repolarization and a shortening of ventricular refractory periods. This resulted in an enhanced inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias and may contribute to the proposed deleterious effects of NSAID in the presence of cardiac disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document