prostatic utricle
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

131
(FIVE YEARS 30)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Abhilasha Rana ◽  
Ankita Aggarwal ◽  
Lekhraj Bairwa ◽  
Vishnu Prasad

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Tsung-Heng Wu ◽  
Yao-Jen Hsu ◽  
Tai-Wai Chin ◽  
Yu-Wei Fu

Background: A prostatic utricle (PU) is an unusual pathology with most patients being asymptomatic. However, approximately 29% of patients may show lower urinary tract symptoms, recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI), postvoid dribbling, urethral discharge, epididymo-orchitis, stones, and secondary incontinence caused by urine trapping in the pouch and urinary retention. The standard treatment is through surgical resection, but it is only offered to patients with symptoms. Case summary: We report a case involving a six-year-old boy with congenital hypothyroidism and penoscrotal hypospadias who had previously undergone onlay urethroplasty for the proximal shaft, chordee release, orchidopexy for bilateral undescended testis, and laparoscopic herniorrhaphy for left inguinal hernia. However, the patient later evolved the repetition of UTI and right epididymo-orchitis. Cyclic voiding cystourethrography confirmed the presence of a cystic lesion communicating with the prostatic urethra from the utricle. The PU was then excised laparoscopically. The utricle was identified posterior to the bladder, and insertions of the vas deferens crossover into the utricle were detected by laparoscopy. The post-procedure course was uneventful. Conclusions: Laparoscopic resection of PUs offers a better exposure field, improved wound appearance, complete resection, and reduces the incidence of complications. During laparoscopy, the PU was clearly distinguished from the bladder or other pelvic organs. An incidental finding of vas deferens crossover has rarely been reported. A combined cystoscopy and laparoscopy for PU resection is executable, safe, and valid in this patient population.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin K. McShane ◽  
Brooke Gurland ◽  
Vipul R. Sheth ◽  
Matias Bruzoni ◽  
Ekene Enemchukwu

Abstract Background This report describes a rare surgical case of an intraabdominal mass in a middle-aged patient 40 years after imperforate anus repair. Case presentation A 44-year-old Latino male with history of repaired anorectal malformation presented with recurrent urinary tract infections and rectal prolapse with bothersome bleeding and fecal incontinence. During his preoperative evaluation, he was initially diagnosed with a prostatic utricle cyst on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging findings, which demonstrated a cystic, thick-walled mass with low signal contents that extended inferiorly to insert into the distal prostatic urethra. However, at the time of surgical resection, the thick-walled structure contained an old, firm fecaloma. The final pathology report described findings consistent with colonic tissue, suggesting a retained remnant of the original fistula and diverticulum. Conclusions Although rare, persistent rectourethral fistula tracts and rectal diverticula after imperforate anus repair can cause symptoms decades later, requiring surgical intervention. This is an important diagnostic consideration for any adult patient with history of imperforate anus.


Author(s):  
Hoa Viet Nguyen ◽  
Tuan Hong Vu ◽  
Quan Quy Hong ◽  
Hung Quang Pham ◽  
Chung Ta Vo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Rashida Shakir ◽  
Michael G. Packer ◽  
Zarine R. Balsara

Dysuria with lower abdominal pain is a common presentation for a urinary tract infection (UTI), and diagnosis is based on symptoms together with a urinalysis and urine culture suggestive of infection. UTI is uncommon in circumcised males who are not sexually active. When urine culture is negative, alternate diagnoses including, but not limited to, gastroenteritis, severe constipation, appendicitis, or epididymitis need to be considered. In patients with a known urologic history of proximal hypospadias and/or disorders of sexual development, rarer diagnoses also need to be considered. This paper reports the case of a 13-year-old male with a remote history of proximal hypospadias repair, who presented with nonspecific lower urinary tract symptoms. Initially he was treated for UTI. However, urine cultures remained negative despite persistent urinary tract symptoms. On further workup, he was found to have an enlarged and infected prostatic utricle. This report illustrates the importance of considering an enlarged prostatic utricle in the differential diagnoses of patients with chronic lower urinary tract symptoms and a history of hypospadias. Additionally, this case highlights the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in clarifying lower urinary tract anatomy in cases where ultrasound is inconclusive.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (03) ◽  
pp. 05-09
Author(s):  
Ouatar Khalid ◽  
◽  
Benamar Mohammed ◽  
Ahssaini Mustapha ◽  
Mellas Soufiane ◽  
...  

Muller cyst is very rare. It is found in about 5% of azoosperm patients. It is a residual embryological vestige of the female genital organ in men. It is a collection developed in the residual uterine cavity of man called the prostatic utricle. [1] it is a benign lesion, most often congenital, rarely acquired. This lesion may be asymptomatic or symptomatic, and may in rare cases be associated with renal agenesis. [2] various means of treatment, treatment is compulsory for cysts that are symptomatic and / or complicated by subfertility. We report here a case of mullers cyst in a young patient treated by puncture and evacuation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document