rectourethral fistula
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

196
(FIVE YEARS 21)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshinori Hirano ◽  
Hiroki Ohge ◽  
Yusuke Watadani ◽  
Shinnosuke Uegami ◽  
Norimitsu Shimada ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rectourethral fistula is a rare disease with a wide variety of etiologies and clinical presentations. A definitive surgical procedure for rectourethral fistula repair has not been established. Case presentation A 13-year-old boy sustained a penetrating injury to the perineum, and developed a symptomatic rectourethral fistula thereafter. Conservative management through urinary diversion and transanal repair was unsuccessful. Fecal diversion with loop colostomy was performed, and three months later, a fistula repair was performed via a transperineal approach with interposition of a local gluteal tissue flap. There were no postoperative complications, and magnetic resonance imaging studies confirmed the successful closure of the fistula. The urinary and fecal diversions were reverted 1 and 6 months after the fistula repair, respectively, and postoperative excretory system complications did not occur. Conclusions The transperineal approach with interposition of a local gluteal tissue flap provides a viable surgical option for adolescent patients with rectourethral fistulas who are unresponsive to conservative management.



Urology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie W Cheng ◽  
Jennifer J Ahn ◽  
Mark P Cain ◽  
Jamie E Anderson ◽  
Caitlin A Smith ◽  
...  




2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (17) ◽  
pp. 4014
Author(s):  
Francisco E. Martins ◽  
João Felicio ◽  
Tiago Ribeiro Oliveira ◽  
Natália Martins ◽  
Vítor Oliveira ◽  
...  

Introduction: To report a series of men with a rectourethral fistula (RUF) resulting from pelvic cancer treatments and explore their therapeutic differences and impact on the functional outcomes and quality of life highlighting the adverse features that should determine permanent urinary or dual diversion. Methods: A retrospective database search was performed in four centers to identify patients with RUF resulting from pelvic cancer treatment. Medical records were analyzed for the demographics, comorbidities, diagnostic evaluation, fistula characteristics, surgical approaches and outcomes. The endpoints analyzed included a successful fistula closure following a repair and the impact of the potential adverse features on outcomes. Results: Twenty-three patients, aged 57–79 years (median 68), underwent an RUF reconstruction. The median follow-up (FU) was 54 months (range 18–115). The patients were divided into two groups according to the etiology: radiation/energy-ablation treatments with or without surgery (G1, n = 10) and surgery only (G2, n = 13). All of the patients underwent a temporary diverting colostomy and suprapubic cystostomy. Overall, a successful RUF closure was achieved in 18 (78%) patients. An interposition flap was used in six (60%) patients and one (7.7%) patient in groups G1 and G2, respectively (p = 0.019). The RUF was managed successfully in all 13 patients in group G2 as opposed to 5/10 (50%) in group G1 (p = 0.008). The patients in the radiation/energy-ablation group were more likely to require permanent dual diversion (50% vs. 0%, p < 0.0075). Conclusion: Radiation/energy-ablation therapies are associated with a more severe RUF and more complex reconstructions. Most of these patients require an abdominoperineal approach and flap interposition. The failure of an RUF repair with the need for permanent dual diversion, eventually combined with extirpative surgery, is higher after previous radiation/energy-ablation treatment. Therefore, permanent dual diversion as the primary treatment should always be included in the decision-making process as reconstruction may be futile in specific settings.



2021 ◽  
Vol 206 (Supplement 3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Hayden ◽  
Brian Inouye ◽  
William Boysen ◽  
Urszula Kowalik ◽  
John Migaly ◽  
...  


Author(s):  
Prashant Singh ◽  
Sanjay Kumar ◽  
Sridhar Panaiyadiyan ◽  
Prabhjot Singh ◽  
Premnath Dogra ◽  
...  


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin K. McShane ◽  
Brooke Gurland ◽  
Vipul R. Sheth ◽  
Matias Bruzoni ◽  
Ekene Enemchukwu

Abstract Background This report describes a rare surgical case of an intraabdominal mass in a middle-aged patient 40 years after imperforate anus repair. Case presentation A 44-year-old Latino male with history of repaired anorectal malformation presented with recurrent urinary tract infections and rectal prolapse with bothersome bleeding and fecal incontinence. During his preoperative evaluation, he was initially diagnosed with a prostatic utricle cyst on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging findings, which demonstrated a cystic, thick-walled mass with low signal contents that extended inferiorly to insert into the distal prostatic urethra. However, at the time of surgical resection, the thick-walled structure contained an old, firm fecaloma. The final pathology report described findings consistent with colonic tissue, suggesting a retained remnant of the original fistula and diverticulum. Conclusions Although rare, persistent rectourethral fistula tracts and rectal diverticula after imperforate anus repair can cause symptoms decades later, requiring surgical intervention. This is an important diagnostic consideration for any adult patient with history of imperforate anus.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document