Breastfeeding practice, breastfeeding policy and hospitalisations for infectious diseases in early and later childhood: a register-based study in Uppsala County, Sweden

ObjectiveTo examine the association between breastfeeding practice and hospitalisations for infectious diseases in early and later childhood, in particular, to compare exclusive breast feeding 4–5 months with exclusive breastfeeding 6 months or more. Thereby, provide evidence to inform breastfeeding policy.DesignA register-based cohort study.SettingA cohort was created by combining the Swedish Medical Birth Register, the National Inpatient Register, the Cause of Death Register, the Total Population Register, the Longitudinal integration database for health insurance and labour market studies, with the Uppsala Preventive Child Health Care database.Patients37 825 term and post-term singletons born to women who resided in Uppsala County (Sweden) between 1998 and 2010.Main outcome measuresNumber of hospitalisations for infectious diseases in early (<2 years) and later childhood (2–4 years).ResultsThe risk of hospitalisations for infectious diseases decreased with duration of exclusive breastfeeding until 4 months of age. In early childhood, breast feeding was associated with a decreased risk of enteric and respiratory infections. In comparison with exclusive breast feeding 6 months or more, the strongest association was found between no breastfeeding and enteric infections (adjusted incidence rate ratios, aIRR 3.32 (95% CI 2.14 to 5.14)). In later childhood, breast feeding was associated with a lower risk of respiratory infections. In comparison with children exclusively breastfed 6 months or more, the highest risk was found in children who were not breastfed (aIRR 2.53 (95% CI 1.51 to 4.24)). The risk of hospitalisations for infectious diseases was comparable in children exclusively breastfed 4–5 months and children exclusively breastfed 6 months or more.ConclusionsOur results support breastfeeding guidelines that recommend exclusive breastfeeding for at least 4 months.

Preschool Communication: Early Identification of Concerns About Preschool Language Development and Social Participation

Background: Adverse communication development in preschool children is a risk factor influencing child health and well-being with a negative impact on social participation. Language and social skills develop and maintain human adaptability over the life course. However, the accuracy of detecting language problems in asymptomatic children in primary care needs to be improved. Therefore, it is important to identify concerns about language development as a risk factor for child health. The association between parental and professional caregivers' concerns about language development and the level of preschool social participation was assessed, as well as the possible mediating/moderating effect of the perception of social competence. In addition, validity and predictive value of parental and professional caregivers' concerns about language development were tested.Methods: To identify emerging concerns about development and social participation, a community sample of 341 preschool children was systematically assessed with a comprehensive preventive child health care “toolkit” of instruments, including parent-completed tools like the Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) and child competence Visual Analog Scales (VAS). At baseline, children were aged 3 years and at follow-up ~4 years.Results: There was a statistically significant association between parental and professional caregivers' concerns about language development and the level of preschool social participation, with a mediating effect of child social competence at the age of 3 years as well as 4 years. Negative predictive value of parental and professional caregiver language concerns at the age of 3 and 4 years were 99 and 97%, respectively. Furthermore, this article showed that while some preschool children grow out of language problems, others may develop them.Conclusion: Short but valid pediatric primary care tools like the PEDS and child competence VAS can support monitoring and early identification of concerns about language development and social competence as a risk factor for preschool social participation. Personalized health care requires continued communication between parents, professional caregivers and preventive child health care about parental and professional caregiver perceptions concerning preschool language development as well as the perception of a child's social competence.

Costs and effects of conventional vision screening and photoscreening in the Dutch preventive child health care system

Background Little is known about costs and effects of vision screening strategies to detect amblyopia. Aim of this study was to compare costs and effects of conventional (optotype) vision screening, photoscreening or a combination in children aged 3–6 years. Methods Population-based, cross-sectional study in preventive child health care in The Hague. Children aged 3 years (3y), 3 years and 9 months (3y9m) or 5–6 years (5/6y) received the conventional chart vision screening and a test with a photoscreener (Plusoptix S12C). Costs were based on test duration and additional costs for devices and diagnostic work-up. Results Two thousand, one hundred and forty-four children were included. The estimated costs per child screened were €17.44, €20.37 and €6.90 for conventional vision screening at 3y, 3y9m and 5/6y, respectively. For photoscreening, these estimates were €6.61, €7.52 and €9.40 and for photoscreening followed by vision screening if the result was unclear (combination) €9.32 (3y) and €9.33 (3y9m). The number of children detected with amblyopia by age were 9, 14 and 5 (conventional screening), 6, 13 and 3 (photoscreening) and 10 (3y) and 15 (3y9m) (combination), respectively. The estimated costs per child diagnosed with amblyopia were €1500, €1050 and €860 for conventional vision screening, €860, €420 and €1940 for photoscreening and €730 (3y) and €450 (3y9m) for the combination. Conclusions Combining photoscreening with vision screening seems promising to detect amblyopia in children aged 3y/3y9m, whereas conventional screening seems preferable at 5/6y. As the number of study children with amblyopia is small, further research on the effects of these screening alternatives in detecting children with amblyopia is recommended.

How to adopt a Personalized approach in preventive Child Health Care? Design of a Mixed Methods Feasibility RCT. (Preprint)

BACKGROUND To adopt Personalized Health Care within preventive Child Health Care, a 360⁰CHILD-profile is developed. On this dashboard, holistic health data are visualized in one image to provide parents/youth and caregivers direct access to a manageable résumé of child’s medical record. Theoretical ordering, conform “International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (Children and Youth version)”, guides thought processes within the relevant context. It is yet unknown if and how this promising tool functions in practice and a variety of feasibility questions must be addressed. OBJECTIVE This paper describes design and methods of a Feasibility RCT, to be performed in the Netherlands (January 2019 - September 2020). RCT’s feasibility (recruitment, response, measure completion, intervention allocation) and 360⁰CHILD-profile’s feasibility (usability, potential effectiveness) will be evaluated. METHODS A pragmatic Mixed Methods design is chosen, starting with an RCT to measure feasibility and health literacy in two parallel groups (1:1). Then, qualitative research will be performed to understand/explain quantitative findings and explore stakeholder’s perspectives on 360⁰CHILD-profile’s potential. Participating CHC-professionals (n≥30) will recruit parents (n≥30) and caregivers (n=±10) of children, who experience problems (age 0-16). Children will only participate if age is above 11 (youth, n=±10). Both groups receive care as usual. Experimental group, additionally, gets access to personalized 360⁰CHILD-profiles. RESULTS Six months after baseline, quantitative outcomes will be measured, analysed (descriptive feasibility statistics and preliminary between group difference) and used to purposively sample for semi-structured interviews. CONCLUSIONS Study results will provide knowledge for building theory on the CHILD-profile and designing future (effect) studies. CLINICALTRIAL Trial registration: NTR 6909; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6731