rocky subtidal
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

88
(FIVE YEARS 12)

H-INDEX

24
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sofia Castelló y Tickell ◽  
Natalie H.N. Low ◽  
Robert W. Lamb ◽  
Margarita Brandt ◽  
Jon D. Witman

Abstract Sea stars (class Asteroidea) can play powerful and wide-ranging roles as consumers of algae and prey items in benthic ecosystems worldwide. In the Galápagos rocky subtidal zone, sea stars are abundant and diverse but their distribution, feeding habits and ecological impacts have received little attention. We compared diets and distributions across the six most abundant sea star species to examine functional roles of this important group. Bi-annual censuses carried out between 2006–2014 at two depths (6-8m, 12-15m) at 12 sites in Galápagos identified two abundance “hotspots” and revealed higher densities at locations with more heterogeneous benthic topographies. Field surveys revealed a high incidence of feeding (35–68% of individuals across species) and distinct diets were evident for each species in terms of food items and dietary breadth, suggesting niche partitioning. Most species can be classified as facultative herbivores, with diets dominated by crustose and turf algae supplemented by a small proportion of sessile invertebrates. The two most abundant species (Pentaceraster cumingi and Nidorellia armata) had the narrowest diets. Field prey selectivity experiments identified P. cumingi as a size-selective predator of the pencil urchin Eucidaris galapagensis. In field caging experiments, N. armata reduced biomass of unbleached crustose coralline algae and macroalgae by 72% and 52%, respectively. In the context of emerging threats such as disease, ocean acidification and climate change, a deeper understanding of distinct functional roles can inform ecological models and management plans.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicente I. Villalobos ◽  
Nelson Valdivia ◽  
Günter Försterra ◽  
Stacy Ballyram ◽  
Juan Pablo Espinoza ◽  
...  

Understanding the distribution of biodiversity along environmental gradients allows us to predict how communities respond to natural and anthropogenic impacts. In fjord ecosystems, the overlap of strong salinity and temperature gradients provides us with the opportunity to assess the spatial variation of biodiversity along abiotic environmental gradients. However, in Northern Chilean Patagonia (NCP), a unique and at the same time threatened fjord system, the variation of macrobenthic communities along abiotic environmental gradients is still poorly known. Here, we tested whether macrobenthic species diversity and community structure followed systematic patterns of variation according to the spatial variation in salinity and temperature in Comau Fjord, NCP. A spatially extensive nested sampling design was used to quantify the abundance of subtidal macrobenthic species along the fjord axis (fjord sections: head, middle, and mouth) and a depth gradient (0–21 m). The vertical structure of the water column was strongly stratified at the head of the fjord, characterized by a superficial (depth to ca. 5 m) low-salinity and relatively colder layer that shallowed and decayed toward the mouth of the fjord. The biotic variation followed, in part, this abiotic spatial pattern. Species richness peaked at high salinities (>27 psu) between 5 and 10 m in the head section and between 15 and 21 m in the middle and mouth sections. Diversity and evenness were also highest at these salinities and depth ranges in the head and middle sections, but at shallower depth ranges in the mouth. Information theory-based model selection provided a strong empirical support to the depth- and section-dependent salinity, but not temperature, effects on the three biodiversity metrics. Erect algae and the edible mussel Aulacomya atra numerically dominated in shallow water (0–3 m) at the head and the middle of the fjord, coinciding with the horizontal extension of the low-density water layer—these taxa were further replaced by the crustose algae Lithothamnion sp. and deep-dwelling suspension filters (e.g., corals, polychaetes, and sponges) along depth gradient. Macrobenthic biodiversity correlated, therefore, with the influence of freshwater inputs and the density-driven stratification of the water column in this ecosystem. The spatially variable (across both, horizontal and vertical fjord axes) thresholds observed in our study question the widely accepted pattern of increasing biodiversity with increasing distance from the head of estuarine ecosystems. Finally, non-linear environmental stress models provide us a strong predictive power to understand the responses of these unique ecosystems to natural and anthropogenic environmental changes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 104991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson Valdivia ◽  
Ignacio Garrido ◽  
Paulina Bruning ◽  
Andrea Piñones ◽  
Luis Miguel Pardo
Keyword(s):  

ZooKeys ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 918 ◽  
pp. 15-28
Author(s):  
Aoi Tsuyuki ◽  
Hiroshi Kajihara

We describe a new species of polyclad flatworm, Enchiridium daidaisp. nov., from the rocky subtidal zone in the East China Sea along the coasts of the Kyushu and Okinawa Islands, Japan. Enchiridium daidaisp. nov. is characterized by i) the entire periphery of the dorsal surface narrowly fringed with orange, ii) a marginal-eyespot band extending to the position of the mouth (about anterior one-eighth of body), and iii) two prostatic vesicles covered by a common muscle sheath, which is penetrated by the ejaculatory duct. We performed a molecular phylogenetic analysis based on 945-bp 28S rDNA sequences of 16 species of Prosthiostomidae currently available in public databases in addition to those of E. daidaisp. nov. and Prosthiostomum torquatumTsuyuki et al., 2019. In the resulting tree, our new species was nested in a clade composed of Enchiridium species. The tree topology was in favor of a taxonomic view that Enchiridium should be defined by having i) a common muscle sheath that encloses two prostatic vesicles and ii) marginal eyespots that may or may not surround the periphery of the dorsal surface.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter H. Adey ◽  
Thew S. Suskiewicz ◽  
Douglas B. Rasher

<p>In the early 1980s, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) initiated an ecosystem analysis of Gouldsboro Bay in eastern Maine as part of a planned marine sanctuary. The original report to NOAA by Walter H. Adey was not published after the sanctuary concept for Maine was abandoned. Because significant human-related climatic and ecosystem changes are underway in the Gulf of Maine, that report provides valuable baseline data and is included as the Appendix to this volume. After qualitatively describing the geological, physical, chemical, and biogeographical features of Gouldsboro Bay and adjacent Dyer Bay, we quantitatively describe the principal bay ecological communities with data collected during the 1981–1983 ecosystem assessment as well as additional measurements taken within the past decade. We then undertake a comparison of the primary productivity of these bays with the Google Earth Pro polygon tool to determine component areas.</p><p><br></p><p>Benthic taxa are the dominant primary producers in both bays: rockweeds (primarily <i>Ascophyllum nodosum</i>, with <i>Fucus vesiculosus </i>secondary) in the intertidal; Irish moss (<i>Chondrus crispus</i>,<i> </i>with<i> Fucus distichus </i>secondary) as a near monoculture in the lowest intertidal (infralittoral); kelps (primarily <i>Saccharina latissima</i>,<i> Laminaria digitata</i>, and <i>Agarum clathratum</i>) in the rocky subtidal; and the angiosperm <i>Zostera marina</i> (seagrass) in soft bottom substrate. The rocky intertidal, dominated by <i>Ascophyllum</i> with a specific productivity of 10.6 kg/m<sup>2</sup>/year, provides nearly one-third of all bay productivity. Because of the proportionally greater shore length relative to area of Dyer Bay, it has 45% greater productivity for its surface area than Gouldsboro Bay. Kelp has a specific productivity value of 7.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>/year, and <i>Zostera</i> of 1.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>/year. The kelps provide approximately 20% of Gouldsboro Bay’s primary productivity and 35% of that of Dyer Bay. <i>Zostera</i> provides roughly 20% of total primary productivity in Gouldsboro Bay and 12% in Dyer Bay. With a primary productivity of 1.73 kg/m<sup>2</sup>/year, salt marshes provide only 3.7% (Gouldsboro) and 2.6% (Dyer) of total primary productivity. With a primary productivity of 0.06 kg/m<sup>2</sup>/year, plankton account for 23.8% of Gouldsboro Bay and 16% of Dyer Bay primary productivity.</p>


Author(s):  
Walter H. Adey ◽  
Thew S. Suskiewicz ◽  
Douglas B. Rasher

In the early 1980s, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) initiated an ecosystem analysis of Gouldsboro Bay in eastern Maine as part of a planned marine sanctuary. The original report to NOAA by Walter H. Adey was not published after the sanctuary concept for Maine was abandoned. Because significant human-related climatic and ecosystem changes are underway in the Gulf of Maine, that report provides valuable baseline data and is included as the Appendix to this volume. After qualitatively describing the geological, physical, chemical, and biogeographical features of Gouldsboro Bay and adjacent Dyer Bay, we quantitatively describe the principal bay ecological communities with data collected during the 1981–1983 ecosystem assessment as well as additional measurements taken within the past decade. We then undertake a comparison of the primary productivity of these bays with the Google Earth Pro polygon tool to determine component areas. Benthic taxa are the dominant primary producers in both bays: rockweeds (primarily Ascophyllum nodosum, with Fucus vesiculosus secondary) in the intertidal; Irish moss (Chondrus crispus, with Fucus distichus secondary) as a near monoculture in the lowest intertidal (infralittoral); kelps (primarily Saccharina latissima, Laminaria digitata, and Agarum clathratum) in the rocky subtidal; and the angiosperm Zostera marina (seagrass) in soft bottom substrate. The rocky intertidal, dominated by Ascophyllum with a specific productivity of 10.6 kg/m2/year, provides nearly one-third of all bay productivity. Because of the proportionally greater shore length relative to area of Dyer Bay, it has 45% greater productivity for its surface area than Gouldsboro Bay. Kelp has a specific productivity value of 7.2 kg/m2/year, and Zostera of 1.2 kg/m2/year. The kelps provide approximately 20% of Gouldsboro Bay’s primary productivity and 35% of that of Dyer Bay. Zostera provides roughly 20% of total primary productivity in Gouldsboro Bay and 12% in Dyer Bay. With a primary productivity of 1.73 kg/m2/year, salt marshes provide only 3.7% (Gouldsboro) and 2.6% (Dyer) of total primary productivity. With a primary productivity of 0.06 kg/m2/year, plankton account for 23.8% of Gouldsboro Bay and 16% of Dyer Bay primary productivity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document