epicormic shoot
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

19
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2022 ◽  
pp. 54-58
Author(s):  
T. M. DeJong

Abstract Knowledge of fruit tree shoot types is helpful to explain why pruning is often not successful in reducing tree size. In many horticultural circumstances, epicormic shoot growth can be considered as being almost exclusively stimulated by severe pruning of large branches (older than one year old) or strong water shoots in which sylleptic shoots have previously grown and "used up" the locations in close proximity to the pruning cut where proleptic buds would have been present in a less vigorous shoot. The strong growth response to heavy pruning is natural and is the primary reason why pruning cannot be relied upon exclusively to control tree size when trees are grown in highly fertile soils without size-controlling rootstocks. This chapter deals with understanding responses to pruning of fruit trees by application of shoot growth rules.


CERNE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Nascimento ◽  
Alexandra Cristina Schatz Sá ◽  
Lucas Bonez de Lemos ◽  
Diego Pereira da Rosa ◽  
Mariane de Oliveira Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 168 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-74
Author(s):  
Joachim Klädtke ◽  
Andreas Ehring

Results of a green pruning experiment with maple, beech, oak, and ash Object of the investigation is a pruning experiment in maple, beech, oak and ash stands in southwest Germany, which started in 2004. Aim of the experiment was to quantify the effects of green pruning on wood decay, discoloration, epicormic shoot formation, radial increment, and occlusion time. At top heights of 8–14 m, trials for each species were placed in stands where the natural pruning had not yet reached the achieved knot-free bole length. In each trial, ten trees were pruned in spring and summer respectively, by cutting 40% of the crown in average and branches up to 80 mm diameter. Additionally, ten unpruned trees were selected on each trial and, as the pruned trees, released from competitors. In 2011 and 2012 respectively, the trees were felled and measured, and wood samples with branches were taken and analysed. Results show that green pruning did not cause any wood decay. Compared to the control trees, increased discoloration was observed in the stems of the pruned trees. However, this was limited to the knotty center of the trunk and did not diffuse to the knotless part. Pruning intensified the formation of epicormic branches, but, except for oak, these branches diminished to the level of the control trees already during the time of observation. Radial increment shows a short-term decrease due to the green pruning, but with an extent below the effect of the dry year in 2003. With branch diameters of 3–4 cm, the pruned trees needed three to five years until the branching wounds were occluded, whereas about nine years were necessary for trees with natural pruning.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-83
Author(s):  
Bence Bárdos ◽  
László Nahóczki ◽  
Dénes Molnár ◽  
Norbert Frank ◽  
Zoltán Köveskuti ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 545-554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Negrón ◽  
Loreto Contador ◽  
Bruce D. Lampinen ◽  
Samuel G. Metcalf ◽  
Yann Guédon ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mika Takiya ◽  
Hiromasa Koyama ◽  
Kiyoshi Umeki ◽  
Michiyasu Yasaka ◽  
Yasuyuki Ohno ◽  
...  

IAWA Journal ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey T. Creber ◽  
Margaret E. Collinson

Specimens of Woodworthia arizonica Jeffrey trees from the Late Triassic of Arizona, U.S.A. and the Permian of Brazil, typically have horizontal vascular traces that have extremely close contacts with the tracheids of the secondary xylem. In modern gymnospermous and angiospermous trees, such traces terminate on preventitious buds deeply embedded in their bark. Such buds develop into epicormic shoots, after substantial loss of foliage through fire or other damage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document