Specificity of Loxosceles α clade phospholipase D enzymes for choline-containing lipids: role of a conserved aromatic cage

Spider venom GDPD-like phospholipases D ( SicTox ) have been identified to be one of the major toxins in recluse spider venom. They are divided into two major clades: the α clade and the β clade. Most α clade toxins present high activity against lipids with choline head groups such as sphingomyelin, while activities in β clade toxins vary and include preference for substrates containing ethanolamine headgroups ( Sicarius terrosus, St_βIB1). A structural comparison of available PLDs structures reveals a conserved aromatic cage in the α clade. To test the potential influence of the aromatic cage on membrane-lipid specificity we performed molecular-dynamics (MD) simulations of the binding of several PLDs onto lipid bilayers containing choline headgroups; two SicTox from the α clade, Loxosceles intermedia αIA1 (Li_αIA) and Loxosceles laeta αIII1 (Ll_αIII1), and one from the β clade, St_βIB1. The simulation results reveal that the aromatic cage captures a choline-headgroup and suggest that the cage plays a major role in lipid specificity. We also simulated an engineered St_βIB1, where we introduced the aromatic cage, and this led to binding with choline-containing lipids. Moreover, a multiple sequence alignment revealed the conservation of the aromatic cage among the α clade PLDs. Here, we confirmed the membrane binding site of α and β clade PLDs on choline and ethanolamine-containing bilayers, respectively. Furthermore, our results suggest a major role in choline lipid recognition of the aromatic cage of the α clade PLDs. The MD simulation results are supported by in vitro liposome binding assay experiments.

Exploring aromatic cage flexibility of the histone methyllysine reader protein Spindlin1 and its impact on binding mode prediction: an in silico study

Some of the main challenges faced in drug discovery are pocket flexibility and binding mode prediction. In this work, we explored the aromatic cage flexibility of the histone methyllysine reader protein Spindlin1 and its impact on binding mode prediction by means of in silico approaches. We first investigated the Spindlin1 aromatic cage plasticity by analyzing the available crystal structures and through molecular dynamic simulations. Then we assessed the ability of rigid docking and flexible docking to rightly reproduce the binding mode of a known ligand into Spindlin1, as an example of a reader protein displaying flexibility in the binding pocket. The ability of induced fit docking was further probed to test if the right ligand binding mode could be obtained through flexible docking regardless of the initial protein conformation. Finally, the stability of generated docking poses was verified by molecular dynamic simulations. Accurate binding mode prediction was obtained showing that the herein reported approach is a highly promising combination of in silico methods able to rightly predict the binding mode of small molecule ligands in flexible binding pockets, such as those observed in some reader proteins.

Polycomb Paralog Chromodomain Inhibitors Active Against Both CBX6 and CBX8

Methyllysine reader proteins bind to methylated lysine residues and alter gene transcription by changing the compaction state of chromatin or by the recruitment of other multiprotein complexes. The polycomb paralog family of methyllysine readers bind to trimethylated lysine on the tail of histone 3 via a highly conserved aromatic cage located in their chromodomains. Each of the polycomb paralogs are implicated in several disease states. CBX6 and CBX8 are members of the polycomb paralog family with two structurally similar chromodomains. By exploring the structure-activity relationships of a previously reported CBX6 inhibitor we have discovered more potent and cell permeable analogs. Our current report includes potent, dual-selective inhibitors of CBX6 and CBX8. We have shown that the –2 position in our scaffold is an important residue for selectivity amongst the polycomb paralogs. Preliminary cell-based studies show that the new inhibitors impact cell proliferation in a rhabdoid tumor cell line. This report includes data on inhibitor design, inhibitor synthesis, compound characterization by LCMS, compound activity by fluorescence polarization, analysis of structure-activity relationships, rhabdoid tumor cell line activity.

Polycomb Paralog Chromodomain Inhibitors Active Against Both CBX6 and CBX8

Methyllysine reader proteins bind to methylated lysine residues and alter gene transcription by changing the compaction state of chromatin or by the recruitment of other multiprotein complexes. The polycomb paralog family of methyllysine readers bind to trimethylated lysine on the tail of histone 3 via a highly conserved aromatic cage located in their chromodomains. Each of the polycomb paralogs are implicated in several disease states. CBX6 and CBX8 are members of the polycomb paralog family with two structurally similar chromodomains. By exploring the structure-activity relationships of a previously reported CBX6 inhibitor we have discovered more potent and cell permeable analogs. Our current report includes potent, dual-selective inhibitors of CBX6 and CBX8. We have shown that the –2 position in our scaffold is an important residue for selectivity amongst the polycomb paralogs. Preliminary cell-based studies show that the new inhibitors impact cell proliferation in a rhabdoid tumor cell line. This report includes data on inhibitor design, inhibitor synthesis, compound characterization by LCMS, compound activity by fluorescence polarization, analysis of structure-activity relationships, rhabdoid tumor cell line activity.

A H3K9me2-Binding Protein AGDP3 Limits DNA Methylation and Transcriptional Gene Silencing in Arabidopsis

DNA methylation is critical for tuning gene expression to prevent potentially deleterious gene-silencing. The Arabidopsis DNA glycosylase/lyase REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 1 (ROS1) initiates active DNA demethylation and is required for the prevention of DNA hypermethylation at thousands of genomic loci. However, the mechanism recruiting ROS1 to specific loci is not well understood. Here, we report the discovery of Arabidopsis AGENET Domain Containing Protein 3 (AGDP3) as a cellular factor required for ROS1-mediated DNA demethylation, and targets ROS1 to specific loci. We found that AGDP3 could bind to the H3K9me2 mark by its AGD12 cassette. The crystal structure of the AGDP3 AGD12 in complex with an H3K9me2 peptide reveals the molecular basis for the specific recognition, that the dimethylated H3K9 and unmodified H3K4 are specifically anchored into two different surface pockets. Interestingly, a histidine residue located in the methylysine binding aromatic cage enables AGDP3 pH-dependent H3K9me2 binding capacity. Considering the intracellular pH correlates with the histone acetylation status, our results provide the molecular mechanism for the regulation of ROS1 DNA demethylase by the gene silencing H3K9me2 mark and the potential crosstalk with active histone acetylation mark.

Molecular basis for SPIN·DOC-Spindlin1 engagement and its role in transcriptional inhibition

ABSTRACTSpindlin1 is a transcriptional coactivator with three Tudor-like domains, of which the first and second Tudors are engaged in histone methylation readout, while the function of the third Tudor is largely unknown. Recent studies revealed that the transcriptional co-activator activity of Spindlin1 could be attenuated by SPIN•DOC. Here we solved the crystal structure of SPIN•DOC-Spindlin1 complex, revealing that a hydrophobic motif, DOCpep3 (256-281), of SPIN•DOC interacts with Tudor 3 of Spindlin1 and completes its β-barrel fold. Massive hydrophobic contacts and hydrogen bonding interactions ensure a high affinity DOCpep3-Spindlin1 engagement with a binding Kd of 30 nM. Interestingly, we characterized two more K/R-rich motifs of SPIN•DOC, DOCpep1 (187-195) and DOCpep2 (228-239), which bind to Spindlin1 at lower affinities with Kd values of 78 μM and 31 μM, respectively. Structural and binding studies revealed that DOCpep1 and DOCpep2 competitively bind to the aromatic cage of Spindlin1 Tudor 2 that is responsible for H3K4me3 readout. Although DOCpep3-Spindlin1 engagement is compatible with histone readout, an extended SPIN•DOC fragment containing DOCpep1 and DOCpep2 inhibits histone or TCF4 binding by Spindin1 due to introduced competition. This inhibitory effect is more pronounced for weaker binding targets but not for strong ones such as H3 “K4me3-K9me3” bivalent mark. Our RT-qPCR experiment showed that the removal of the hydrophobic motif or the K/R-rich region compromised the inhibitory effects of SPIN•DOC on Spindlin1-mediated transcriptional activation. In sum, here we revealed multivalent engagement between SPIN•DOC and Spindlin1, in which a hydrophobic motif acts as the primary binding site for stable SPIN•DOC-Spindlin1 association, while two more neighboring K/R-rich motifs further modulate the target selectivity of Spindlin1 via competitive inhibition, therefore attenuating the transcriptional co-activator activities of Spindlin1 through affecting its chromatin association.