Volcano monitoring in Latin America: taking a step forward

Monitoring the state of active volcanoes is the foundational component of volcanic risk reduction strategies. To a large extent, these responsibilities rest with volcano observatories. Based on the 11 Reports that constitute this Special Issue—“Volcano Observatories in Latin America”—we provide a comprehensive overview of the work that has been carried out by the observatories in Latin America, a region in which tens of millions of people are exposed to volcanic activity. Since the first steps taken in the 1980s, volcano observatories of the region have made significant progress in assessing and monitoring volcanic activity. Currently, 17 institutions officially contribute to monitoring 135 volcanoes in 10 countries. Along with the improvements in the instrumental, technical, and operational capabilities, advancements have been made in long-term hazard assessment and hazard communication. But despite all the progress accomplished, several challenges and limiting factors still remain, such as the lack of financial resources and training opportunities. Efforts should be focused on increasing the number and quality of monitoring networks. El monitoreo del estado de los volcanes activos es un componente fundamental de las estrategias para la reducción del riesgo volcánico. En gran medida, estas responsabilidades recaen en los observatorios volcánicos. A partir de los 11 Reportes que constituyen este Número Especial –“Observatorios volcanológicos en América Latina”– brindamos un detallado resumen del trabajo llevado adelante por los observatorios en Latinoamérica, una región con decenas de millones de personas expuestas a la actividad volcánica. Desde sus primeros pasos a principios de 1980, los observatorios volcanológicos de la región han logrado avances significativos en la evaluación y vigilancia de la actividad volcánica. Actualmente, 17 instituciones contribuyen oficialmente al monitoreo de 135 volcanes en 10 países. Junto con las mejoras en sus capacidades instrumentales, técnicas y operativas, se produjeron avances también en la evaluación y comunicación de peligros a largo plazo. A pesar del avance logrado, aún persisten desafíos y factores limitantes, como la falta de recursos económicos y oportunidades de capacitación. Los esfuerzos futuros deben centrarse en aumentar el número y la calidad de las redes de monitoreo.

Gamification and Hazard Communication in Virtual Reality: A Qualitative Study

An effective warning attracts attention, elicits knowledge, and enables compliance behavior. Game mechanics, which are directly linked to human desires, stand out as training, evaluation, and improvement tools. Immersive virtual reality (VR) facilitates training without risk to participants, evaluates the impact of an incorrect action/decision, and creates a smart training environment. The present study analyzes the user experience in a gamified virtual environment of risks using the HTC Vive head-mounted display. The game was developed in the Unreal game engine and consisted of a walk-through maze composed of evident dangers and different signaling variables while user action data were recorded. To demonstrate which aspects provide better interaction, experience, perception and memory, three different warning configurations (dynamic, static and smart) and two different levels of danger (low and high) were presented. To properly assess the impact of the experience, we conducted a survey about personality and knowledge before and after using the game. We proceeded with the qualitative approach by using questions in a bipolar laddering assessment that was compared with the recorded data during the game. The findings indicate that when users are engaged in VR, they tend to test the consequences of their actions rather than maintaining safety. The results also reveal that textual signal variables are not accessed when users are faced with the stress factor of time. Progress is needed in implementing new technologies for warnings and advance notifications to improve the evaluation of human behavior in virtual environments of high-risk surroundings.

Typology of Hazard Event Severity Metrics for Multi-Hazard Research

<p>In the scholarly field of hazards, adverse impacts of a hazard event are interpreted as the result of interactions among hazard elements, exposure of entities of value, and vulnerability of the exposed entities. The severity of hazard elements is usually communicated as a magnitude or intensity. Such hazard event magnitude or intensity metrics correspond to the expected damages due to a hazard event given an average exposure and vulnerability. These severity metrics can be used to facilitate hazard communication and enhance emergency management. However, hazard event severity metrics for singular hazard types such as the earthquake Richter magnitude and the Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale cannot be readily adapted for multi-hazard comparative analyses. The first and foremost challenge to such comparative analyses is a lack of conceptual framework to systemically classify different hazard event severity metrics. In this presentation, we introduce a four-dimensional typology of hazard event severity metrics for hazard research within a multi-hazard context. The four dimensions include the spatial, temporal, applicational, and indicial dimensions. Based on a literature review on 67 existing hazard event magnitude or intensity scales for 21 singular hazard types, we demonstrate that the proposed typology can be applied to classify hazard event severity metrics. We further implement the proposed typology to two newly developed equivalent hazard event severity metrics called the Gardoni Scale and the Murphy Scale to showcase the utility of the proposed typology in facilitating quantification of hazard severity across different hazard event types.</p>