protein intrinsic disorder
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

62
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 3)

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Hu ◽  
Akila Katuwawala ◽  
Kui Wang ◽  
Zhonghua Wu ◽  
Sina Ghadermarzi ◽  
...  

AbstractIdentification of intrinsic disorder in proteins relies in large part on computational predictors, which demands that their accuracy should be high. Since intrinsic disorder carries out a broad range of cellular functions, it is desirable to couple the disorder and disorder function predictions. We report a computational tool, flDPnn, that provides accurate, fast and comprehensive disorder and disorder function predictions from protein sequences. The recent Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID) experiment and results on other test datasets demonstrate that flDPnn offers accurate predictions of disorder, fully disordered proteins and four common disorder functions. These predictions are substantially better than the results of the existing disorder predictors and methods that predict functions of disorder. Ablation tests reveal that the high predictive performance stems from innovative ways used in flDPnn to derive sequence profiles and encode inputs. flDPnn’s webserver is available at http://biomine.cs.vcu.edu/servers/flDPnn/


Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 608
Author(s):  
Vladimir N. Uversky ◽  
Elrashdy M. Redwan ◽  
Abdullah A. Aljadawi

Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) is a viral respiratory disease caused by one of the human coronaviruses, MERS-CoV [...]


Author(s):  
Marco Necci ◽  
◽  
Damiano Piovesan ◽  
Silvio C. E. Tosatto ◽  

AbstractIntrinsically disordered proteins, defying the traditional protein structure–function paradigm, are a challenge to study experimentally. Because a large part of our knowledge rests on computational predictions, it is crucial that their accuracy is high. The Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID) experiment was established as a community-based blind test to determine the state of the art in prediction of intrinsically disordered regions and the subset of residues involved in binding. A total of 43 methods were evaluated on a dataset of 646 proteins from DisProt. The best methods use deep learning techniques and notably outperform physicochemical methods. The top disorder predictor has Fmax = 0.483 on the full dataset and Fmax = 0.792 following filtering out of bona fide structured regions. Disordered binding regions remain hard to predict, with Fmax = 0.231. Interestingly, computing times among methods can vary by up to four orders of magnitude.


2021 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 216a
Author(s):  
Bartlomiej J. Blus ◽  
Aleksandra Krolak ◽  
Junseock Koh ◽  
Hyuk-Soo Seo ◽  
Elias Coutavas

2021 ◽  
pp. 295-354
Author(s):  
Sveinn Bjarnason ◽  
Sarah F. Ruidiaz ◽  
Jordan McIvor ◽  
Davide Mercadante ◽  
Pétur O. Heidarsson

Cells ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 2654
Author(s):  
Jacinta M. Wubben ◽  
Sarah C. Atkinson ◽  
Natalie A. Borg

The transport of host proteins into and out of the nucleus is key to host function. However, nuclear transport is restricted by nuclear pores that perforate the nuclear envelope. Protein intrinsic disorder is an inherent feature of this selective transport barrier and is also a feature of the nuclear transport receptors that facilitate the active nuclear transport of cargo, and the nuclear transport signals on the cargo itself. Furthermore, intrinsic disorder is an inherent feature of viral proteins and viral strategies to disrupt host nucleocytoplasmic transport to benefit their replication. In this review, we highlight the role that intrinsic disorder plays in the nuclear transport of host and viral proteins. We also describe viral subversion mechanisms of the host nuclear transport machinery in which intrinsic disorder is a feature. Finally, we discuss nuclear import and export as therapeutic targets for viral infectious disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 899-908
Author(s):  
Sunghyun Hong ◽  
Sangmin Choi ◽  
Ryeonghyeon Kim ◽  
Junseock Koh

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Necci ◽  
Damiano Piovesan ◽  
Silvio C.E. Tosatto ◽  
◽  

AbstractIntrinsically disordered proteins defying the traditional protein structure-function paradigm represent a challenge to study experimentally. As a large part of our knowledge rests on computational predictions, it is crucial for their accuracy to be high. The Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID) experiment was established as a community-based blind test to determine the state of the art in predicting intrinsically disordered regions in proteins and the subset of disordered residues involved in binding other molecules. A total of 43 methods, 32 for disorder and 11 for binding regions, were evaluated on a dataset of 646 novel manually curated proteins from DisProt. The best methods use deep learning techniques and significantly outperform widely used earlier physicochemical methods across different types of targets. Disordered binding regions remain hard to predict correctly. Depending on the definition used, the top disorder predictor has an FMax of 0.483 (DisProt) or 0.792 (DisProt-PDB). As the top binding predictor only attains an FMax of 0.231, this suggests significant potential for improvement. Intriguingly, computing times among the top performing methods vary by up to four orders of magnitude.


Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard Kian-Meng Goh ◽  
A. Keith Dunker ◽  
James A. Foster ◽  
Vladimir N. Uversky

The world is currently witnessing an outbreak of a new coronavirus spreading quickly across China and affecting at least 24 other countries. With almost 65,000 infected, a worldwide death toll of at least 1370 (as of 14 February 2020), and with the potential to affect up to two-thirds of the world population, COVID-19 is considered by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be a global health emergency. The speed of spread and infectivity of COVID-19 (also known as Wuhan-2019-nCoV) are dramatically exceeding those of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). In fact, since September 2012, the WHO has been notified of 2494 laboratory-confirmed cases of infection with MERS-CoV, whereas the 2002–2003 epidemic of SARS affected 26 countries and resulted in more than 8000 cases. Therefore, although SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 are all the result of coronaviral infections, the causes of the coronaviruses differ dramatically in their transmissibility. It is likely that these differences in infectivity of coronaviruses can be attributed to the differences in the rigidity of their shells which can be evaluated using computational tools for predicting intrinsic disorder predisposition of the corresponding viral proteins.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document