droplet vaporization
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

300
(FIVE YEARS 52)

H-INDEX

40
(FIVE YEARS 3)

Bioprinting ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. e00188
Author(s):  
Mitra Aliabouzar ◽  
Adam W.Y. Ley ◽  
Sabine Meurs ◽  
Andrew J. Putnam ◽  
Brendon M. Baker ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 3263-3274
Author(s):  
Jenna Osborn ◽  
Megan S. Anderson ◽  
Morgan Beddingfield ◽  
Lijie Grace Zhang ◽  
Kausik Sarkar

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark T. Burgess ◽  
Jeffrey A. Ketterling ◽  
Mitra Aliabouzar ◽  
Christian Aguilar ◽  
Mario L. Fabiilli

Author(s):  
Ying Xin ◽  
Aili Zhang ◽  
Lisa X. Xu ◽  
J. Brian Fowlkes

Abstract Acoustic droplet vaporization (ADV) has proven to enhance high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) thermal ablation of tumor. It has also been demonstrated that triggering droplets before HIFU exposure could be a potential way to control both the size and the shape of the thermal lesion. In this paper, a numerical model is proposed to predict the thermal lesion created in ADV enhanced HIFU treatment. Bubble oscillation was coupled into a viscoelastic medium in the model to more closely represent real applications in tissues. Several physical processes caused by continuous wave ultrasound and elevated temperature during the HIFU exposure were considered, including rectified diffusion, gas solubility variation with temperature in the medium, boiling, etc. Four droplet concentrations spanning two orders of magnitude were calculated. The bubble cloud formed from triggering of the droplets by the pulse wave ultrasound, along with the evolution of the shape and location of the bubble cloud and thermal lesion during the following continuous wave exposure were obtained. The increase of bubble void fraction caused by continuous wave exposure were found to be consistent with the experimental observation. With the increase of droplet concentration, the predicted bubble cloud shapes vary from tadpole to triangular and double triangular, while the thermal lesions move toward the transducer. The results show that the assumptions used in this model increased the accuracy of the results. This model may be used for parametrical study of ADV enhanced HIFU treatment and be further used for treatment planning and optimization in the future.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 808-862
Author(s):  
Sepand Tehrani Fateh ◽  
Lida Moradi ◽  
Elmira Kohan ◽  
Michael R Hamblin ◽  
Amin Shiralizadeh Dezfuli

The field of theranostics has been rapidly growing in recent years and nanotechnology has played a major role in this growth. Nanomaterials can be constructed to respond to a variety of different stimuli which can be internal (enzyme activity, redox potential, pH changes, temperature changes) or external (light, heat, magnetic fields, ultrasound). Theranostic nanomaterials can respond by producing an imaging signal and/or a therapeutic effect, which frequently involves cell death. Since ultrasound (US) is already well established as a clinical imaging modality, it is attractive to combine it with rationally designed nanoparticles for theranostics. The mechanisms of US interactions include cavitation microbubbles (MBs), acoustic droplet vaporization, acoustic radiation force, localized thermal effects, reactive oxygen species generation, sonoluminescence, and sonoporation. These effects can result in the release of encapsulated drugs or genes at the site of interest as well as cell death and considerable image enhancement. The present review discusses US-responsive theranostic nanomaterials under the following categories: MBs, micelles, liposomes (conventional and echogenic), niosomes, nanoemulsions, polymeric nanoparticles, chitosan nanocapsules, dendrimers, hydrogels, nanogels, gold nanoparticles, titania nanostructures, carbon nanostructures, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, fuel-free nano/micromotors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document