The effect of restored medial knee anatomy in total knee arthroplasty with the flexion first balancer technique on mid-flexion laxity and functional outcome

Background The Flexion First Balancer (FFB) technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was developed to maintain the isometry of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) by restoring the medial anatomy of the knee. Inability to correct MCL isometry could hypothetically result in an increased mid-flexion laxity. The aim of the current study was to evaluate if the FFB technique results in improved functional outcome and less mid-flexion laxity compared to Measured Resection (MR). Methods A cross-sectional study was performed comparing 27 FFB patients with 28 MR patients. Groups were matched for age, gender, BMI and ASA classification. All patient received the cruciate retained type, Vanguard Complete Knee System (Biomet Orthopedics, Warsaw, IN, USA). Stress X-rays of the knee with 30 degrees of flexion were made to assess varus-valgus laxity. Furthermore, three tests were conducted to asses functional outcome: a 6 min walk test, a stair climb test and quadriceps peak force measurements. Mean follow-up was respectively 2.6 (SD 0.4) and 3.9 years (SD 0.2). Results The MR group showed a postoperative elevation in joint line in contrast to the FFB group, the mean difference between the two groups was 3 mm (p < 0.001). No differences in total laxity between the two groups was found. The FFB group showed a higher quadriceps peak force (1.67 (SD 0.55) N/BMI) in comparison with the MR group (1.38 (SD 0.48) N/BMI) (p < 0.05). All other outcome parameters were comparable between the two groups (p: n.s.). Correlation analysis showed a moderate negative correlation between joint line elevation and quadriceps peak force (r = − 0.29, p < 0.05). Conclusion The FFB technique did not lead to less coronal laxity in the mid-flexion range compared to MR. Although peak quadriceps force was significantly higher for the FFB group no clinically relevant benefits could be identified for the patients with regards to functional outcome. Therefore, minor deviations in joint line seems to have no effect on functional outcome after TKA. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN85351296. Registered 23 april 2021 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN85351296

Additional distal femoral resection increases mid-flexion coronal laxity in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty with flexion contracture

Aims Surgeons commonly resect additional distal femur during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture, which leads to femoral joint line elevation. There is a paucity of data describing the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion stability and knee kinematics. Thus, the goal of this study was to quantify the effect of joint line elevation on mid-flexion laxity. Methods Six computational knee models with cadaver-specific capsular and collateral ligament properties were implanted with a posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA. A 10° flexion contracture was created in each model to simulate a capsular contracture. Distal femoral resections of + 2 mm and + 4 mm were then simulated for each knee. The knee models were then extended under a standard moment. Subsequently, varus and valgus moments of 10 Nm were applied as the knee was flexed from 0° to 90° at baseline and repeated after each of the two distal resections. Coronal laxity (the sum of varus and valgus angulation with respective maximum moments) was measured throughout flexion. Results With + 2 mm resection at 30° and 45° of flexion, mean coronal laxity increased by a mean of 3.1° (SD 0.18°) (p < 0.001) and 2.7° (SD 0.30°) (p < 0.001), respectively. With + 4 mm resection at 30° and 45° of flexion, mean coronal laxity increased by 6.5° (SD 0.56°) (p < 0.001) and 5.5° (SD 0.72°) (p < 0.001), respectively. Maximum increased coronal laxity for a + 4 mm resection occurred at a mean 15.7° (11° to 33°) of flexion with a mean increase of 7.8° (SD 0.2°) from baseline. Conclusion With joint line elevation in primary PS TKA, coronal laxity peaks early (about 16°) with a maximum laxity of 8°. Surgeons should restore the joint line if possible; however, if joint line elevation is necessary, we recommend assessment of coronal laxity at 15° to 30° of knee flexion to assess for mid-flexion instability. Further in vivo studies are warranted to understand if this mid-flexion coronal laxity has negative clinical implications. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):87–93.

Predicting Functional Coronal Knee Laxity in Pre-Operative TKA Patients Using Morphological Measurements

Currently, pre-operative analysis of soft-tissue balance is limited to measures of passive laxity rather than active laxity. By including active laxity data, a more comprehensive surgical plan can be delivered, however there are no measures for active laxity currently in routine use. Therefore, the validation of a proxy measure based on routine collected imaging is valuable. This study aimed to determine whether coronal knee laxity can be predicted from pre-operative alignment and bony morphology of the knee. Fifty-eight patients with pre-operative CT and stressed x-ray imaging for activity laxity were analysed to identify anatomical landmarks and determine varus-valgus laxity ranges for a range of flexion angles with the joint subjected to lateral forces. Correlations between anatomical and alignment parameters, vs laxity ranges and midpoints were determined using pairwise complete Pearson linear correlation analyses. Of the 17 anatomical/alignment measurements studied, 8 correlated significantly with the knee laxity range’s midpoint at 20 ̊ flexion, with the strongest correlation being with supine coronal alignment (r = 0.95, p &lt; 0.001); the findings were similar at 45-90 ̊. Compared to knee laxity midpoint, knee laxity range was not as strongly correlated with anatomical and alignment parameters, with only 3 anatomical parameters correlated significantly with laxity range at 20 ̊ flexion and none at 45-90 ̊ flexion. These results suggest morphological measurements and anatomical characteristics may help define functional coronal laxity range of the knee.

Highly Satisfied Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Display a Wide Range of Soft Tissue Balance

Soft tissue balancing while crucial for a successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is incompletely defined and the subject of broad recommendations. We analyzed 69 unilateral computer-assisted surgery posterior stabilized (PS) TKA subjects who postoperatively scored ≥36 out of a possible 40 points on the satisfaction section of the American Knee Society score (2011). We examined a range of postoperative coronal plane laxity parameters and the correlation between preoperative and postoperative laxity. Total postoperative coronal laxity arcs at maximum extension and 20 degrees of flexion varied between 2 and 12 and 3 and 13 degrees, respectively. Depending on the position of measurement, medial laxity was between 0.5 and 9.5 degrees and lateral laxity between 1 and 12 degrees. The change in laxity between maximum extension and 90 degrees of flexion demonstrated a range of 7 degrees medially and 12 degrees laterally. The total coronal arc of movement did not affect functional outcomes. A moderate correlation of 0.452 and 0.424 was seen between initial and postoperative total coronal laxity arcs in maximum extension and 20 degrees of flexion, respectively. The individual variability for each measured parameter within our cohort demonstrates TKA satisfaction is not as simple as producing a narrow range of coronal laxity parameters and that as with many body systems considerable variation is still consistent with excellent function. Our findings help to define acceptable balance parameters for PS TKA. It does not appear necessary to closely match postoperative laxity to that present preoperatively.