Abstract
Objectives/scope
Discuss the analytical framework created by ADNOC for the implementation of post-investment reviews (PIR) of previous capital projects, and present an overview of both the results, the lessons learnt and the limitations of such exercises, based on ADNOC's return of experience on PIRs.
Without sharing confidential project information, the article will focus on providing actionable insights on ADNOC's chosen approach for PIRs, including best practices in terms of data and stakeholder management.
Methods, procedures, process
The overall approach can be summarized as follows:
Project choice: what are the tangible criteria to be used to focus PIRs on the capital projects with the highest potential in terms of learning opportunity? Data collection: what are the minimum data requirements to conduct a PIR for an O&G project? Variance analysis: what rules need to be followed to be able to generate two economics models (initial vs updated) that can be compared? Root cause analysis: how to organize the analysis process to explain the identified variances?
Results, observations, conclusions
PIRs can play an important role in the continuous improvement of O&G companies’ operations at the pre-investment stage, capital investment stage, and operation stage:
At the investment stage, a PIR can provide insights into the effectiveness of the decision-making and, specifically, help to identify improvement areas in the valuation (project economics), assumptions, risk management, and decision-making processes. At the execution stage, PIRs can be useful to quantify the impact of project delays and cost overruns on the overall project economics, and associate such variances with the relevant underlying causes. At the operation stage, PIRs be useful to quantify the impact of OPEX, production, and price variances (actual – forecast) on overall project economics, and associate such variances with the relevant underlying causes.
Limitations of PIRs
Uncertainty on what projects are likely to yield the best learning opportunities. Subjectivity: PIRs are partly subjective, as the results are largely dependent on data availability and methodological choices. Applicability of recommendations and acceptance from key stakeholders