avian visual system
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

25
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
William Clark ◽  
Matthew Chilcott ◽  
Amir Azizi ◽  
Roland Pusch ◽  
Kate Perry ◽  
...  

AbstractDiscriminating between object categories (e.g., conspecifics, food, potential predators) is a critical function of the primate and bird visual systems. We examined whether a similar hierarchical organization in the ventral stream that operates for processing faces in monkeys also exists in the avian visual system. We performed electrophysiological recordings from the pigeon Wulst of the thalamofugal pathway, in addition to the entopallium (ENTO) and mesopallium ventrolaterale (MVL) of the tectofugal pathway, while pigeons viewed images of faces, scrambled controls, and sine gratings. A greater proportion of MVL neurons fired to the stimuli, and linear discriminant analysis revealed that the population response of MVL neurons distinguished between the stimuli with greater capacity than ENTO and Wulst neurons. While MVL neurons displayed the greatest response selectivity, in contrast to the primate system no neurons were strongly face-selective and some responded best to the scrambled images. These findings suggest that MVL is primarily involved in processing the local features of images, much like the early visual cortex.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian J. Ausprey ◽  
Mark E. Hauber

In coevolutionary arms-races, reciprocal ecological interactions and their fitness impacts shape the course of phenotypic evolution. The classic example of avian host–brood parasite interactions selects for host recognition and rejection of increasingly mimetic foreign eggs. An essential component of perceptual mimicry is that parasitic eggs escape detection by host sensory systems, yet there is no direct evidence that the avian visual system covaries with parasitic egg recognition or mimicry. Here, we used eye size measurements collected from preserved museum specimens as a metric of the avian visual system for species involved in host–brood parasite interactions. We discovered that (i) hosts had smaller eyes compared with non-hosts, (ii) parasites had larger eyes compared with hosts before but not after phylogenetic corrections, perhaps owing to the limited number of independent evolutionary origins of obligate brood parasitism, (iii) egg rejection in hosts with non-mimetic parasitic eggs positively correlated with eye size, and (iv) eye size was positively associated with increased avian-perceived host–parasite eggshell similarity. These results imply that both host-use by parasites and anti-parasitic responses by hosts covary with a metric of the visual system across relevant bird species, providing comparative evidence for coevolutionary patterns of host and brood parasite sensory systems.


eLife ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahito Yamagata ◽  
Wenjun Yan ◽  
Joshua R Sanes

Retinal structure and function have been studied in many vertebrate orders, but molecular characterization has been largely confined to mammals. We used single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to generate a cell atlas of the chick retina. We identified 136 cell types plus 14 positional or developmental intermediates distributed among the six classes conserved across vertebrates – photoreceptor, horizontal, bipolar, amacrine, retinal ganglion and glial cells. To assess morphology of molecularly defined types, we adapted a method for CRISPR-based integration of reporters into selectively expressed genes. For Müller glia, we found that transcriptionally distinct cells were regionally localized along the anterior-posterior, dorsal-ventral and central-peripheral retinal axes. We also identified immature photoreceptor, horizontal cell and oligodendrocyte types that persist into late embryonic stages. Finally, we analyzed relationships among chick, mouse and primate retinal cell classes and types. Our results provide a foundation for anatomical, physiological, evolutionary, and developmental studies of the avian visual system.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahito Yamagata ◽  
Wenjun Yan ◽  
Joshua R. Sanes

SUMMARYRetinal structure and function have been studied in many vertebrate orders, but molecular characterization has been largely confined to mammals. We used single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to generate a cell atlas of the chick retina. From ∼40,000 single cell transcriptomes, we identified 136 cell types distributed among the six classes conserved across vertebrates – photoreceptor, horizontal, bipolar, amacrine, retinal ganglion and glial cells. To match molecular profiles to morphology, we adapted a method for CRISPR-based integration of reporters into selectively expressed genes. For Müller glia, we found that transcriptionally distinct cells were regionally localized along the anterior-posterior, dorsal-ventral and central-peripheral retinal axes. We also identified immature photoreceptor, horizontal cell and oligodendrocyte types that persist into late embryonic stages. Finally, we analyzed relationships among chick, mouse and primate retinal cell classes and types. Taken together, our results provide a foundation for anatomical, physiological, evolutionary, and developmental studies of the avian visual system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 223 (20) ◽  
pp. jeb229609
Author(s):  
Alec B. Luro ◽  
Esteban Fernández-Juricic ◽  
Patrice Baumhardt ◽  
Mark E. Hauber

ABSTRACTColor and spatial vision is critical for recognition and discrimination tasks affecting fitness, including finding food and mates, and recognizing offspring. For example, as a counter defense to avoid the cost of raising the unrelated offspring of obligate interspecific avian brood parasites, many host species routinely view, recognize and remove the foreign egg(s) from their nests. Recent research has shown that host species visually attend to both chromatic and spatial pattern features of eggs; yet how hosts simultaneously integrate these features together when recognizing eggs remains an open question. Here, we tested egg rejection responses of American robins (Turdus migratorius) using a range of 3D-printed model eggs covered with blue and yellow checkered patterns differing in relative square sizes. We predicted that robins would reject a model egg if they could visually resolve the blue and yellow squares as separate features, or accept it if the squares blended together and appeared similar in color to the natural blue–green color of robin eggs as perceived by the avian visual system. As predicted, the probability of robins rejecting a model egg increased with greater sizes of its blue and yellow squares. Our results suggest that chromatic visual acuity and viewing distance have the potential to limit the ability of a bird to recognize a foreign egg in its nest, thus providing a limitation to host egg recognition that obligate interspecific avian brood parasites may exploit.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alec B. Luro ◽  
Esteban Fernández-Juricic ◽  
Patrice Baumhardt ◽  
Mark E. Hauber

AbstractColor and spatial vision are critical for recognition and discrimination tasks affecting fitness, including finding food and mates and recognizing offspring. For example, as a counter defense to avoid the cost of raising the unrelated offspring of obligate interspecific avian brood parasites, many host species routinely view, recognize, and remove the foreign egg(s) from their nests. Recent research has shown that host species visually attend to both chromatic and spatial pattern features of eggs; yet how hosts simultaneously integrate these features together when recognizing eggs remains an open question. Here, we tested egg rejection responses of American robins (Turdus migratorius) using a range of 3D-printed model eggs covered with blue and yellow checkered patterns differing in relative square sizes. We predicted that robins would reject a model egg if they could visually resolve the blue and yellow squares as separate features or accept it if the squares blended together and appeared similar in color to the natural blue-green color of robin eggs as perceived by the avian visual system. As predicted, the probability of robins rejecting a model egg increased with greater sizes of its blue and yellow squares. Our results suggest that chromatic visual acuity and viewing distance have the potential to limit the ability of a bird to recognize a foreign egg in its nest, thus providing a limitation to host egg recognition that obligate interspecific avian brood parasites may exploit.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise Dalbosco Dell’Aglio ◽  
Jolyon Troscianko ◽  
Martin Stevens ◽  
W Owen McMillan ◽  
Chris D Jiggins

AbstractForests are a mosaic of light spectra, and colour signal efficiency might change in different light environments. Local adaptation in Heliconius butterflies is linked to microhabitat use and the colourful wing colour patterns may be adapted for signalling in different light environments. These toxic butterflies exhibit conspicuous colours as a warning to predators that they should be avoided, but also find and choose potential mates based on colour signals. The two selection pressures of predation and mate preference are therefore acting together. Colour conspicuousness should show habitat-specific contrast for the butterflies, which would facilitate detection and species identification. On the other hand, selection for signal stability would be stronger in the avian visual system. In this study we analysed the contrast of two Heliconius mimicry rings in their natural habitats under varying degrees of forest fragmentation and light conditions. We used digital image analyses and mapped the bird and butterfly vision colour space in order to examine whether warning colours have greater contrast and if they transmit a consistent signal across time of the day and habitat in a tropical forest. We tested conspicuousness using opponent colour channels against a natural green background. For avian vision, colours are generally very stable through time and habitat. For butterfly vision, there is some evidence that species are more contrasting in their own habitats, where conspicuousness is higher for red and yellow bands in the border and for white in the forest. Light environment affects Heliconius butterflies’ warning signal transmission to a higher degree through their own vision, but to a lesser degree through avian predator vision. This work provides insight into the use of colour signals in sexual and natural selection in the light of ecological adaptation.


2010 ◽  
Vol 213 (19) ◽  
pp. 3357-3363 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Rubene ◽  
O. Hastad ◽  
R. Tauson ◽  
H. Wall ◽  
A. Odeen

2009 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 673-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley F. Blackwell ◽  
Esteban Fernández-Juricic ◽  
Thomas W. Seamans ◽  
Tracy Dolan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document