Numerical Investigation on Influence of Two Combined Faults and Its Structure Features on Rock Burst Mechanism

With the increase in coal mining depth, engineering geological conditions and the stress environment become more complex. Many rock bursts triggered by two combined faults have been observed in China, but the mechanism is not understood clearly. The focus of this research aims at investigating the influence of two combined faults on rock burst mechanisms. The six types of two combined faults were first introduced, and two cases were utilized to show the effects of two combined faults types on coal mining. The mechanical response of the numerical model with or without combined faults was compared, and a conceptual model was set up to explain the rock burst mechanism triggered by two combined faults. The influence of fault throw, dip, fault pillar width, and mining height on rock burst potential was analyzed. The main control factors of rock burst in six models that combined two faults were identified by an orthogonal experiment. Results show that six combinations of two faults can be identified, including stair-stepping fault, imbricate fault, graben fault, horst fault, back thrust fault, and ramp fault. The particular roof structure near the two combined faults mining preventing longwall face lateral abutment pressure from transferring to deep rock mass leads to stress concentration near the fault areas. Otherwise, a special roof structure causing the lower system stiffness of mining gives rise to the easier gathering of elastic energy in the coal pillars, which makes it easier to trigger a rock burst. There is a nonlinear relationship between fault parameters and static or dynamic load for graben faults mining. The longwall face has the highest rock burst risk when the fault throw is between 6 and 8 m, the fault dip is larger than 65°, the mining height is greater than 6 m, and the coal pillar width is less than 50 m. The stair-stepping, imbricate, horst, and ramp fault compared to the other fault types will produce higher dynamic load stress during longwall retreat. Fault pillar width is the most significant factor for different two combined faults, leading to the rise of static load stress and dynamic proneness.

Mechanism of Rock Bursts Induced by the Synthetic Action of “Roof Bending and Rock Pillar Prying” in Subvertical Extra-Thick Coal Seams

When studying the rock burst mechanism in subvertical extra-thick coal seams in the Wudong coal mine in Xinjiang, China, most studies focus on rock pillars, while the effect of the roof on rock bursts is usually ignored. In this paper, a rock burst mechanism in subvertical extra-thick coal seams under the control of a “roof-rock pillar” is proposed. A theoretical analysis is first performed to explain the effect of roof-rock pillar combinations on rock bursts in coal seams. Numerical modeling and microseismic analysis are implemented to further study the mechanism of rock burst. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) During the mining of the B3+6 coal seam, an obvious microseismic concentration phenomenon is found in both the roof and rock pillar of B3+6. The rock bursts exhibited obvious directionality, and its main failure characteristics are floor heave and sidewall heave, but there will also be some failures such as shoulder socket subsidence in some parts. 2) The stress transfer caused by rock pillar prying is the main reason for the large difference in rock burst occurrence near the vertical and extra thick adjacent coal seams under the same mining depth. 3) Under the same cantilever length, the elastic deformation energy of the roof is much greater than that of the rock pillar, which makes it easier to produce high-energy microseismic events. With an increasing mining depth, the roof will become the dominant factor controlling the occurrence of rock bursts. 4) The high-energy event produced by the rock mass fracture near the coal rock interface easily induces rock bursts, while the high-energy event produced by the fracture at the far end of the rock mass is less likely to induce rock burst. 5) Roof deformation extrusion and rock pillar prying provide high static stress conditions for the occurrence of rock bursts in the B3+6 coal seam. The superposition of the dynamic disturbance caused by roof and rock pillar failure and the high static stress of the coal seam is the main cause of rock burst in the B3+6 coal seam.

Review of the Research Progress of Rock Burst

Rock burst is one of geological hazards encountered frequently, rock burst research has important significance for safety production in mine. The paper based on different definitions of rock burst, the produce conditions and manifestation of rock burst are summarized, and classified. The mechanism and prediction of rock burst in the mainstream view the advantage and disadvantages on comparison, a novel thought is given for rock burst mechanism. Suggest t to continue research on the mechanism of rock burst, and multi field coupling method to predict rock burst.

Numerical Experiments of Drilling Pressure Relief Preventing Roadway Rock Burst

Based on rock burst mechanism and the present research situation of control technique, pressure relief process of drilling to rock burst roadway is modeled by numerical simulation software, the contrast and analysis of stress field of surrounding rock are put up with and without pressure relief. The results of the calculation indicate that after drilling high stress area on the both sides of the roadway reduces obviously, but stress peak increases and its position is not converted into the deep areas evidently. It is the energy of the high stress area that makes the rock mass between the drillings failure, which achieves the purpose of pressure relief. Drilling diameter and space between drillings are main factors influencing pressure relief effect. The major the drilling diameter and the smaller the space between boreholes, the more complete the rock mass between the drillings failure and the better the pressure relief effect.