Factors hindering shared files retrieval

Purpose Personal information management (PIM) is an activity in which people store information items in order to retrieve them later. The purpose of this paper is to test and quantify the effect of factors related to collection size, file properties and workload on file retrieval success and efficiency. Design/methodology/approach In the study, 289 participants retrieved 1,557 of their shared files in a naturalistic setting. The study used specially developed software designed to collect shared files’ names and present them as targets for the retrieval task. The dependent variables were retrieval success, retrieval time and misstep/s. Findings Various factors compromise shared files retrieval including: collection size (large number of files), file properties (multiple versions, size of team sharing the file, time since most recent retrieval and folder depth) and workload (daily e-mails sent and received). The authors discuss theoretical reasons for these negative effects and suggest possible ways to overcome them. Originality/value Retrieval is the main reason people manage personal information. It is essential for retrieval to be successful and efficient, as information cannot be used unless it can be re-accessed. Prior PIM research has assumed that factors related to collection size, file properties and workload affect file retrieval. However, this is the first study to systematically quantify the negative effects of these factors. As each of these factors is expected to be exacerbated in the future, this study is a necessary first step toward addressing these problems.

Broken File Retrieval in the Lower Right First Molar Using an Ultrasonic Instrument and Endodontic Micro Forceps

Broken files affect cleaning, shaping, and filling processes of the root canal, thereby causing maintenance failure. Objective. This report explains how to remove broken files using ultrasonic instruments and endodontic micro forceps. Case Report. A 25-year-old female patient had incomplete root canal treatment at the lower right first molar 1 week ago. There were radiolucency in the bifurcation and apical root and the presence of broken files in the 1/3 coronal mesiolingual root. The retrieval started by making a staging platform with an ET20 ultrasonic tip. Endodontic micro forceps were used including a screw wedge that works by clamping the file fragments through a mechanical lock and pulling them to the coronal. Conclusion. It is possible to successfully remove broken files from the root canal using ultrasonic instruments and endodontic micro forceps.

Experimental Assessment of PCR Specificity and Copy Number for Reliable Data Retrieval in DNA Storage

ABSTRACTSynthetic DNA has been gaining momentum as a potential storage medium for archival data storage1–9. Digital information is translated into sequences of nucleotides and the resulting synthetic DNA strands are then stored for later individual file retrieval via PCR7–9(Fig. 1a). Using a previously presented encoding scheme9and new experiments, we demonstrate reliable file recovery when as few as 10 copies per sequence are stored, on average. This results in density of about 17 exabytes/g, nearly two orders of magnitude greater than prior work has shown6. Further, no prior work has experimentally demonstrated access to specific files in a pool more complex than approximately 106unique DNA sequences9, leaving the issue of accurate file retrieval at high data density and complexity unexamined. Here, we demonstrate successful PCR random access using three files of varying sizes in a complex pool of over 1010unique sequences, with no evidence that we have begun to approach complexity limits. We further investigate the role of file size on successful data recovery, the effect of increasing sequencing coverage to aid file recovery, and whether DNA strands drop out of solution in a systematic manner. These findings substantiate the robustness of PCR as a random access mechanism in complex settings, and that the number of copies needed for data retrieval does not compromise density significantly.