Obras públicas y ejecución de sentencias (Consideraciones a propósito de la Sentencia de la Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo del Tribunal Supremo de 16 de mayo de 2014)

LABURPENA: Hurrengo lerroak Auzitegi Gorenaren Administrazioarekiko Auzietako Salaren 2014ko maiatzaren 16ko sententzia bati buruzkoak dira. Lortutako kasazio-errekurtsoak baztertu eta estatuaren titulartasuna duen liburutegi bat eraikitzeko obren udal-lizentzia baliogabetzat jo zuen sententzia bat lege-ezintasunagatik ez betearazteko prententsioa ukatzen duen instantziako auzitegiaren ebazpena berresten du. Epaiaren arabera, obra publikoa izatea ez dela nahikoa arrazoi ez betearazteko eskaera dekretatzeko, nahiz eta obra horren bidez jabetza publikoko ondasun bat lortu eta interes kulturaleko ondasunen erregimenari lotuta egon. Aitzitik, boto partikularrak dio, hiru gertakari horiek bat egin dutenez, instantziaren salak lege-ezintasunagatik ez betearazteko eskaera onartu beharko lukeela, Administrazioarekiko Auzien Jurisdikzioaren Legearen 105.2 artikuluaz haratago. Planteamendu horiek alde batera utzita, testuak honako tesi hau defendatzen du: ebazpen judizial irmo bat ez betetzea, bai kausa materialengatik, bai kausa legalengatik edo juridikoengatik, nahitaezko desjabetzearen suposizio bat da eta Konstituzioaren 33. artikulua hartzen du barne (ez, ordea, 24. artikulua). Ildo horretatik, aintzat hartuz ebazpen judizial guztiak, oro har, dagozkion baldintzetan bete behar direla, ordezkapen edo baliokidetasun bidez betetzea benetako desjabetzea ezkutatzen duen aitzakia baino ez da, eta ≪kalte-ordain egokien≫ izenean, behar bezalako erreparazioa edo balio justua eskatzen du. RESUMEN: Las lineas que siguen se articulan sobre una Sentencia de la Sala de lo Contencioso-Administrativo del Tribunal Supremo, de 16 de mayo de 2014, que, con desestimacion de los recursos de casacion entablados, ratifican la decision del tribunal de instancia de denegar la pretension de inejecucion, por imposibilidad legal, de una sentencia que habia declarado la invalidez de la licencia municipal de obras en cuya virtud se habia construido una biblioteca de titularidad estatal. La Sentencia niega que sea causa bastante para decretar la inejecucion solicitada el tratarse de una obra publica cuya realizacion da lugar a un bien de dominio publico que, ademas, esta sujeto al regimen de los bienes de interes cultural. Por el contrario, el voto particular sostiene que la confluencia de estas tres circunstancias deberia haber conducido por la sala de instancia a acceder a la pretension de que fuera declarada la referida inejecucion por causa de imposibilidad legal ex articulo 105.2 de la Ley de la Jurisdiccion Contencioso-Administrativa. Frente a estos planteamientos, en el texto se defiende la tesis de que la inejecucion de una resolucion judicial firme, ya por causas materiales ya, en particular, por causas legales o juridicas, es un supuesto de expropiacion forzosa, en el que esta implicado no el derecho del articulo 24 sino el del articulo 33 de la Constitucion. En este sentido, por tanto, y dado que, en puridad, todo pronunciamiento judicial firme es, con caracter general, susceptible de ser ejecutado en sus propios terminos, la llamada ejecucion por sustitucion o por equivalente no es sino un subterfugio que encubre, en realidad, una verdadera privacion de caracter expropiatorio, que demanda, incluso bajo la veste de una ≪congrua indemnizacion≫, la debida reparacion o justiprecio. ABSTRACT: The lines that follow deal with a judgment by the Contentiousadministrative section of the Supreme Court, from May 16th of 2014 that with the dismissal of the appeals on point of law ratifiies the decision adopted by the judge of first instace who had declared the invalidity of a municipal license for building by virtue of which a library owned by the State was built. The judgment denies to be a sufficient reason to decree the requested non execution the fact that it is a public work whose execution leads to a public domain property that besides it is bound by the regime of cultural assets. On the contrary, the dissenting opinion mantains that the convegence of these three circumstances should have lead the section to accept the claim that the non execution be agreed by cause of a legal impossibility of article 105.2 of the Act of the Contentious-Administrative jurisdiction. Opposite this approach, this text stands up for the thesis that the non execution of a final judicial decision either because of material reasons or in particular because of legal reasons is forceful expropiation case where it is at stake not article 24 but article 33 of the Constitution. In this sense, therefore, and due to the fact that strictly speaking every final judicial ruling can generally be subject to be executed in its own terms, the so called execution by substitution or by equivalent is not but a subterfuge that in reality conceals a true loss of the expropiatory nature which claims, even under the garb of a congruent compensation, the due reparation or fair value.

Extracting Ontology Properties from the Web-Tables

Web-tables are ubiquitous in Web pages. Since tables themselves are organized structurally and semantically, they are good resources from which we can easily extract ontology. But, most Web-tables are designed for intuitive perception of humans, thus, it has a certain limit to interpret table content using only structural information of the table. So this paper focuses on the method for interpretation of table content based on semantic characteristics of the table. In order to obtain many property elements used for ontology inference, in this paper, the authors discuss how to extract ontology properties from Web-tables. The extracted properties include the following elements: Is-a relationship, class-instance relationship, triple, property domain, property range, symmetric property, transitive property, functional property, and inverse functional property, property for defining super-sub relationship. Through experiment, the authors show that their method can effectively extract property elements from Web-tables.

A degree theory for compact perturbations of properC1Fredholm mappings of index0

We construct a degree for mappings of the formF+Kbetween Banach spaces, whereFisC1Fredholm of index0andKis compact. This degree generalizes both the Leray-Schauder degree whenF=Iand the degree forC1Fredholm mappings of index0whenK=0. To exemplify the use of this degree, we prove the “invariance-of-domain” property whenF+Kis one-to-one and a generalization of Rabinowitz's global bifurcation theorem for equationsF(λ,x)+K(λ,x)=0.