marker location
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

22
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa M. S. Visscher ◽  
Marie Freslier ◽  
Florent Moissenet ◽  
Sailee Sansgiri ◽  
Navrag B. Singh ◽  
...  

For interpreting outcomes of clinical gait analysis, an accurate estimation of gait events, such as initial contact (IC) and toe-off (TO), is essential. Numerous algorithms to automatically identify timing of gait events have been developed based on various marker set configurations as input. However, a systematic overview of the effect of the marker selection on the accuracy of estimating gait event timing is lacking. Therefore, we aim to evaluate (1) if the marker selection influences the accuracy of kinematic algorithms for estimating gait event timings and (2) what the best marker location is to ensure the highest event timing accuracy across various gait patterns. 104 individuals with cerebral palsy (16.0 ± 8.6 years) and 31 typically developing controls (age 20.6 ± 7.8) performed clinical gait analysis, and were divided into two out of eight groups based on the orientation of their foot, in sagittal and frontal plane at mid-stance. 3D marker trajectories of 11 foot/ankle markers were used to estimate the gait event timings (IC, TO) using five commonly used kinematic algorithms. Heatmaps, for IC and TO timing per group were created showing the median detection error, compared to detection using vertical ground reaction forces, for each marker. Our findings indicate that median detection errors can be kept within 7 ms for IC and 13 ms for TO when optimizing the choice of marker and detection algorithm toward foot orientation in midstance. Our results highlight that the use of markers located on the midfoot is robust for detecting gait events across different gait patterns.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam L Tyson ◽  
Mateo Vélez-Fort ◽  
Charly V Rousseau ◽  
Lee Cossell ◽  
Chryssanthi Tsitoura ◽  
...  

To interpret in vivo experiments designed to understand brain function, high-resolution whole-brain microscopy provides a means for post hoc determination of the location of implanted devices and recorded cells in three dimensional brain space that is a critical step for data interrogation. Here we have developed Python-based tools (brainreg and brainreg-segment) to accurately map, in a common coordinate space, the position of dye-labelled probe tracks and two-photon imaged cell populations expressing fluorescent protein. The precise location of probes and cells were validated using physiological recordings and human raters that indicate accuracy levels to less than 70μm. These flexible, open-source methodologies are expected to further evolve with need and to deliver the anatomical precision that is necessary for understanding the functional architecture of the brain.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao-Shan Chen ◽  
Xiao-Long Zhang ◽  
Rong-Rong Yang ◽  
Guang-Ling Wang ◽  
Xin-Yue Zhu ◽  
...  

The complexity of brain circuitry is manifested by numerous cell types based on genetic marker, location and neural connectivity. Cell-type specific recording and manipulation is essential to disentangle causal neural mechanisms in physiology and behavior; however, many current approaches are largely limited by number of intersectional features, incompatibility of common effectors and insufficient gene expression. To tackle these limitations, we devise an intein-based intersectional synthesis of transactivator (IBIST) to selectively control gene expression of common effectors in specific cell types defined by a combination of multiple features. We validate the specificity and sufficiency of IBIST to control common effectors including fluorophores, optogenetic opsins and Ca2+ indicators in various intersectional conditions in vivo. Using IBIST-based Ca2+ imaging, we show that the IBIST can intersect up to five features, and that hippocampal cells tune differently to distinct emotional valences depending on the pattern of projection targets. Collectively, the IBIST multiplexes the capability to intersect cell-type features and is compatible with common effectors to effectively control gene expression, monitor and manipulate neural activities.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Lara M. Coyne ◽  
Micheál Newell ◽  
Marco J.M. Hoozemans ◽  
Andrew Morrison ◽  
Susan J. Brown

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 79-80
Author(s):  
H. Del Rosario Martínez ◽  
A.V. Ruescas Nicolau ◽  
E. Parrilla Bernabé ◽  
D. Garrido Jaén ◽  
J. López Pascual

Nanobiosensor explore centers around creating innovations that can make huge commitments in the zones of human and infection marker location, promising environmental remediation, nano-and biomaterials portrayal, and biocatalyst advancement. These innovations appear as nanometrically designed with improved functionality and characteristics to be employed in a diverse array of applications.


Author(s):  
Mark A. Price ◽  
Andrew K. LaPrè ◽  
Russell T. Johnson ◽  
Brian R. Umberger ◽  
Frank C. Sup

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (sup1) ◽  
pp. S51-S52
Author(s):  
Kirsty McDonald ◽  
Eric Honert ◽  
Olivia Cook ◽  
Karl Zelik

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document