social network mining
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

57
(FIVE YEARS 12)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (S15) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pietro Hiram Guzzi ◽  
Giuseppe Tradigo ◽  
Pierangelo Veltri

Abstract Background Representations of the relationships among data using networks are widely used in several research fields such as computational biology, medical informatics and social network mining. Recently, complex networks have been introduced to better capture the insights of the modelled scenarios. Among others, dual networks (DNs) consist of mapping information as pairs of networks containing the same set of nodes but with different edges: one, called physical network, has unweighted edges, while the other, called conceptual network, has weighted edges. Results We focus on DNs and we propose a tool to find common subgraphs (aka communities) in DNs with particular properties. The tool, called Dual-Network-Analyser, is based on the identification of communities that induce optimal modular subgraphs in the conceptual network and connected subgraphs in the physical one. It includes the Louvain algorithm applied to the considered case. The Dual-Network-Analyser can be used to study DNs, to find common modular communities. We report results on using the tool to identify communities on synthetic DNs as well as real cases in social networks and biological data. Conclusion The proposed method has been tested by using synthetic and biological networks. Results demonstrate that it is well able to detect meaningful information from DNs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Chen Chen ◽  
Ruiyue Peng ◽  
Lei Ying ◽  
Hanghang Tong

The connectivity of networks has been widely studied in many high-impact applications, ranging from immunization, critical infrastructure analysis, social network mining, to bioinformatic system studies. Regardless of the end application domains, connectivity minimization has always been a fundamental task to effectively control the functioning of the underlying system. The combinatorial nature of the connectivity minimization problem imposes an exponential computational complexity to find the optimal solution, which is intractable in large systems. To tackle the computational barrier, greedy algorithm is extensively used to ensure a near-optimal solution by exploiting the diminishing returns property of the problem. Despite the empirical success, the theoretical and algorithmic challenges of the problems still remain wide open. On the theoretical side, the intrinsic hardness and the approximability of the general connectivity minimization problem are still unknown except for a few special cases. On the algorithmic side, existing algorithms are hard to balance between the optimization quality and computational efficiency. In this article, we address the two challenges by (1) proving that the general connectivity minimization problem is NP-hard and is the best approximation ratio for any polynomial algorithms, and (2) proposing the algorithm CONTAIN and its variant CONTAIN + that can well balance optimization effectiveness and computational efficiency for eigen-function based connectivity minimization problems in large networks.


Author(s):  
Nadeem Akhtar ◽  
Mohd Vasim Ahamad

A social network can be defined as a complex graph, which is a collection of nodes connected via edges. Nodes represent individual actors or people in the network, whereas edges define relationships among those actors. Most popular social networks are Facebook, Twitter, and Google+. To analyze these social networks, one needs specialized tools for analysis. This chapter presents a comparative study of such tools based on the general graph aspects as well as the social network mining aspects. While considering the general graph aspects, this chapter presents a comparative study of four social network analysis tools—NetworkX, Gephi, Pajek, and IGraph—based on the platform, execution time, graph types, algorithm complexity, input file format, and graph features. On the basis of the social network mining aspects, the chapter provides a comparative study on five specialized tools—Weka, NetMiner 4, RapidMiner, KNIME, and R—with respect to the supported mining tasks, main functionality, acceptable input formats, output formats, and platform used.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-343
Author(s):  
Hocheol Lee ◽  
Eun Bi Noh ◽  
Sea Hwan Choi ◽  
Bo Zhao ◽  
Eun Woo Nam

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-275
Author(s):  
Mu-Yen Chen ◽  
Chien-Hsiang Liao ◽  
Edwin David Lughofer ◽  
Erol Egrioglu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document