membrane protein crystallization
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

111
(FIVE YEARS 6)

H-INDEX

29
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Ryuichi Kato ◽  
Masahiko Hiraki ◽  
Yusuke Yamada ◽  
Mikio Tanabe ◽  
Toshiya Senda

In 2003, a fully automated protein crystallization and monitoring system (PXS) was developed to support the structural genomics projects that were initiated in the early 2000s. In PXS, crystallization plates were automatically set up using the vapor-diffusion method, transferred to incubators and automatically observed according to a pre-set schedule. The captured images of each crystallization drop could be monitored through the internet using a web browser. While the screening throughput of PXS was very high, the demands of users have gradually changed over the ensuing years. To study difficult proteins, it has become important to screen crystallization conditions using small amounts of proteins. Moreover, membrane proteins have become one of the main targets for X-ray crystallography. Therefore, to meet the evolving demands of users, PXS was upgraded to PXS2. In PXS2, the minimum volume of the dispenser is reduced to 0.1 µl to minimize the amount of sample, and the resolution of the captured images is increased to five million pixels in order to observe small crystallization drops in detail. In addition to the 20°C incubators, a 4°C incubator was installed in PXS2 because crystallization results may vary with temperature. To support membrane-protein crystallization, PXS2 includes a procedure for the bicelle method. In addition, the system supports a lipidic cubic phase (LCP) method that uses a film sandwich plate and that was specifically designed for PXS2. These improvements expand the applicability of PXS2, reducing the bottleneck of X-ray protein crystallography.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Ihara ◽  
Masakatsu Hato ◽  
Takanori Nakane ◽  
Keitaro Yamashita ◽  
Tomomi Kimura-Someya ◽  
...  

Abstract In meso crystallization of membrane proteins relies on the use of lipids capable of forming a lipidic cubic phase (LCP). However, almost all previous crystallization trials have used monoacylglycerols, with 1-(cis-9-octadecanoyl)-rac-glycerol (MO) being the most widely used lipid. We now report that EROCOC17+4 mixed with 10% (w/w) cholesterol (Fig. 1) serves as a new matrix for crystallization and a crystal delivery medium in the serial femtosecond crystallography of Adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR). The structures of EROCOC17+4-matrix grown A2AR crystals were determined at 2.0 Å resolution by serial synchrotron rotation crystallography at a cryogenic temperature, and at 1.8 Å by LCP-serial femtosecond crystallography, using an X-ray free-electron laser at 4 and 20 °C sample temperatures, and are comparable to the structure of the MO-matrix grown A2AR crystal (PDB ID: 4EIY). Moreover, X-ray scattering measurements indicated that the EROCOC17+4/water system did not form the crystalline LC phase at least down to − 20 °C, in marked contrast to the equilibrium MO/water system, which transforms into the crystalline LC phase below about 17 °C. As the LC phase formation within the LCP-matrix causes difficulties in protein crystallography experiments in meso, this feature of EROCOC17+4 will expand the utility of the in meso method.


Crystals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youzhong Guo

Membrane proteins are an important class of macromolecules found in all living organisms and many of them serve as important drug targets. In order to understand their biological and biochemical functions and to exploit them for structure-based drug design, high-resolution and accurate structures of membrane proteins are needed, but are still rarely available, e.g., predominantly from X-ray crystallography, and more recently from single particle cryo-EM — an increasingly powerful tool for membrane protein structure determination. However, while protein-lipid interactions play crucial roles for the structural and functional integrity of membrane proteins, for historical reasons and due to technological limitations, until recently, the primary method for membrane protein crystallization has relied on detergents. Bicelle and lipid cubic phase (LCP) methods have also been used for membrane protein crystallization, but the first step requires detergent extraction of the protein from its native cell membrane. The resulting, crystal structures have been occasionally questioned, but such concerns were generally dismissed as accidents or ignored. However, even a hint of controversy indicates that methodological drawbacks in such structural research may exist. In the absence of caution, structures determined using these methods are often assumed to be correct, which has led to surprising hypotheses for their mechanisms of action. In this communication, several examples of structural studies on membrane proteins or complexes will be discussed: Resistance-Nodulation-Division (RND) family transporters, microbial rhodopsins, Tryptophan-rich Sensory Proteins (TSPO), and Energy-Coupling Factor (ECF) type ABC transporters. These analyses should focus the attention of membrane protein structural biologists on the potential problems in structure determination relying on detergent-based methods. Furthermore, careful examination of membrane proteins in their native cell environments by biochemical and biophysical techniques is warranted, and completely detergent-free systems for membrane protein research are crucially needed.


Lab on a Chip ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 944-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy M. Schieferstein ◽  
Ashtamurthy S. Pawate ◽  
Michael J. Varel ◽  
Sudipto Guha ◽  
Ieva Astrauskaite ◽  
...  

Microfluidic platforms for formulation of crystallization trials with microseeds to enable the growth of high-quality protein crystals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document