performance distribution
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

56
(FIVE YEARS 15)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 51-68
Author(s):  
Ja-Heon Lee ◽  
◽  
Eun-Yong Choi

ILUMINURAS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (56) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Gallo Garcia

Neste artigo, apresento a obra da artista francesa Sophie Calle (1953 - presente) como um vetor para investigação acerca do espaço público, indagando o papel que as práticas artísticas críticas (Mouffe, 2013) podem desempenhar no questionamento da pressuposição democrática de tais espaços a partir dos conceitos de dissenso, aqui compreendido enquanto racionalidade política não consensual, e da partilha do sensível, que nos permite vislumbrar potencialidades da arte enquanto ferramenta política (Rancière, 1996; 2009). A partir das obras Suíte Veneziana (1980), The Detective (1981), The Address Book (1983), The Bronx (1980), Phone Booth (1994) os conceitos de dissenso e partilha do sensível serão articulados para análise das imagens e à luz dos registros textuais da artista sobre estes trabalhos.Palavras-chave: Sophie Calle; Flânerie; Performance Urbana; Partilha do Sensível; Dissenso.  SOPHIE CALLE’S FLÂNERIE: REFLECTIONS ON PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SPACESAbstract: In this article, I present the artwork of the French artist Sophie Calle (born 1953) as a medium to investigate the public space, inquiring which role that critical art practices (Mouffe, 2013) can play in questioning the assumption of democracy given to public spaces from the concepts of dissent as a non-consensual political rationality, and the distribution of the sensible, which allows us to glimpse the potential of art as a political tool (Rancière, 1996; 2009). From the artworks Suite Venetienne (1980), The Detective (1981), The Address Book (1983), The Bronx (1980) and Phone Booth (1994), the concepts of dissent and distribution of the sensible will be articulated for the analysis of images and the artist's textual records of these artworks.Keywords: Sophie Calle; Flânerie; Urban Performance; Distribution of the Sensible; Dissent.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tri Minarti

Dayak Pakpak tribe is one of the Dayak tribes in Sintang regency, it is located at Nanga Ungai village, Kayan Hulu Subdistrict, whereas at there the distribution of inheritance uses a customary law until nowadays.The research discussion designed toward the performance distribution of inheritance on Dayak Pakpak community by the Temenggung adat which related to the Customary Law of Dayak Papak in Nanga Ungai Village, Kayan Hulu subdistrict.The approach used in this research is a Sociological Juridical Method. The approach is defined as problem analysis through legal research of factual facts in institution concerned or toward the community which covered as problems handled in the research.As results, the implementation of inheritance distribution on Dayak Pakpak community by the Temenggung adat are suitable with a customary law of Dayak Papak in Nanga Ungai Village, Kayan Hulu subdistrict, which is implementedby Temenggung with the beneficiary in accordance with the beneficiary’s orders for the period of his lifetime, as for the group who gets the inheritance biological child, wife/husband, parents (father/mother:only if the person concerned dies), grandchildren (in case the child is no longer there) and grand children (in case the grandchild is not there).In conclusion, according to the customary law of Dayak Papak in Nanga Ungai Village, Kayan Hulu District, it is carried out by Temenggung together with the heirs in accordance with the heir’s orders during his lifetime. The group who gets the inheritance Natural children, wife / husband, parents (father / mother if the person concerned dies), grandchildren (in this case the child is no longer there) and grandchildren (in this case the grandchild is not there). Then after, if there is a debate in those family mentioned in receiving the assets, it should be resolved by gathering together as means of talk for finding solution and the Head of Custom together with the Temenggung must be engaged.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Genling Huang ◽  
Jiqiang Wang

Collective behaviors such as synchronization, consensus, and flocking have been extensively investigated over the past decades. Many important results have been disseminated concerning the properties of complex networks. Recent technological development requires performance distribution, and this motivates the resolution to the issue of performance distributability. Albeit in a simple setup, this paper presents an attempt to attacking this problem. Important results are obtained for performance redistribution under both unitary and specified specifications. Constraints are also considered revealing the tight bounds on both nodes dynamics and graph elements for fulfilling the performance distribution and redistribution requirements. Examples are presented for verification of the claims.


Author(s):  
Laura Heiskala ◽  
Jani Erola ◽  
Elina Kilpi-Jakonen

Abstract The rules of intake, which determine how educational institutions are accessed, play a significant part in generating intergenerational educational inequalities. Different rules may allow parental advantages to compensate for students’ lack of advantages (such as academic performance) or to multiply and help only those students who are in a position to use such additional advantages. In this article, we study compensation and the multiplication of advantages in the context of the Finnish higher education system. Entrance exams and a dual model (universities and polytechnics) make this system stand out among many other Western countries and hence suitable for this study. Using high-quality Finnish register data, we study the associations between parental education and stratified higher education enrolment across the school performance distribution. Our results show that polytechnics provide access for poorly performing students from higher social origins (compensatory advantage). Polytechnic education also attracts well-performing students from lower social origins, which leads to a situation in which well-performing students with higher social origins have a substantially larger probability of enrolling in university compared to well-performing students with lower social origins (multiplicative advantage).


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-394
Author(s):  
Michael Grätz ◽  
Øyvind N Wiborg

Abstract Research on educational mobility usually studies socioeconomic differences at the mean of children’s academic performance but fails to consider the variation in the shape of socioeconomic differences across the outcome distribution. Theories of social mobility as well as theories about the resource allocation within families predict such variation. We use quantile regression models to estimate variation in socioeconomic differences across the distribution of academic performance using different indicators of family background (parental education, occupation, earnings, and wealth). We apply this approach to data on Germany, Norway, and the United States, three countries that represent different welfare and education regimes that may affect the intergenerational transmission of educational advantage. We find stronger socioeconomic differences at the bottom than at the middle and the smallest differences at the top of the performance distribution. These findings are virtually identical across all four indicators of family background. We also find no cross-national differences in the shape of socioeconomic differences in academic performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document