Reducing unintended retained foreign objects in operating rooms: a proactive risk assessment framework to improve patient safety

According to a study by Johns Hopkins, an average of 251,454 Americans die annually from medical errors. Medical error is the third leading cause of death in the U.S. after heart disease and cancer. Unintended retained foreign objects (URFOs) has been identified as the most common sentinel event by The Joint Commission. This paper proposes a proactive risk assessment framework to enhance patient safety in operating rooms by addressing the URFOs issue. This framework is developed by integrating the 10 traits of a positive safety culture, initially introduced by the nuclear industry and later adopted by other industries, with an accident investigation methodology called AcciMap, originally developed by Rasmussen. The AcciMap is a hierarchical framework consisting of several layers: government and regulatory bodies, company (hospital), (surgery division) management, (operating room) staff, and work. Thirty main categories of socio-technical contributing causes of URFOs were captured across the AcciMap layers. Organizational factors were identified as the root cause of questionable decisions made by staff and management. Financial and budget constraints, inadequate training infrastructure, absence of a risk management infrastructure, and leadership failure are the most influential organizational factors contributed to URFOs. Our mapping of the aforementioned positive safety culture traits on the AcciMap depicted that the four traits of Work Processes, Leadership Safety Values and Actions, Effective Communication, and Continuous Learning had the most influence on the URFOs issue. Associated recommendations to these findings are provided to contribute to reducing risks of URFOs instances.

Reducing IV-contaminated blood specimens in the clinical laboratory: A Quality Improvement Project

Introduction/Objective Preanalytical errors constitute the most common errors in the laboratory, with improper specimen collection accounting for many errors. In our laboratory, we had a sentinel event related to repeated deletions of suspected IV-contaminated draws, and herein report our quality improvement project (QIP) to reduce deleted test results and IV-contaminated specimens. Methods/Case Report Our QIP initiated with creating a core-lab task force. Several interventions were launched: (A) policy/definition standardization, (B) nursing IV-line/cathedar in-services, (C) in-services on deleting test results and identifying IV-contamination, (D) policy updates to reflect no deletions without evidence of IV-contamination, and (E) mitigation steps requiring supervisory approval for result deletions. We measured: patient safety events (PSRs); RECOLLECTION comment usage and efficacy (disclaimer attached to results thought to be IV-contaminated, requesting recollection); and mitigation failures. Efficacy of the comment usage was measured by comparing subsequent collections to the original and determining likelihood of IV-contamination (contaminated, not contaminated, and unsure). Prior to the QIP, lab practice was to delete suspected IV-contaminated results and those requested by the care team. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) PSRs attributable to IV-contamination dropped from 47/mo. (time 0) to 18/mo. over an 11-month period (min-8/mo.; max-64/mo.), with the greatest decrement seen following intervention C. The RECOLLECTION comment was attached to 38 results (0.06% of total accessions) at the start and 73 results (0.12% of total accessions) at time 11 mos. and showed greatest increase in use immediately prior to interventions C and D (approximately 3-fold increase). At time 0, 54% of RECOLLECTION comments were deemed contaminated and 31% were not; at time 11mos., 74% (50/68) were contaminated and 24% (16/68) were not. Mitigation failures numbered 5/mo. initially and 1/mo. at time 11 mos. Conclusion With multiple educational and supervisory interventions, we demonstrate a reduction in PSRs attributable to IV-contamination collections at our hospital. Use of cautionary disclaimers was overall minimal and appropriately used.

Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review

Background A retained surgical item (RSI) is defined as a never-event and can have drastic consequences on patient, provider, and hospital. However, despite increased efforts, RSI events remain the number one sentinel event each year. Hard foreign bodies (e.g. surgical sharps) have experienced a relative increase in total RSI events over the past decade. Despite this, there is a lack of literature directed towards this category of RSI event. Here we provide a systematic review that focuses on hard RSIs and their unique challenges, impact, and strategies for prevention and management. Methods Multiple systematic reviews on hard RSI events were performed and reported using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. Database searches were limited to the last 10 years and included surgical “sharps,” a term encompassing needles, blades, instruments, wires, and fragments. Separate systematic review was performed for each subset of “sharps”. Reviewers applied reciprocal synthesis and refutational synthesis to summarize the evidence and create a qualitative overview. Results Increased vigilance and improved counting are not enough to eliminate hard RSI events. The accurate reporting of all RSI events and near miss events is a critical step in determining ways to prevent RSI events. The implementation of new technologies, such as barcode or RFID labelling, has been shown to improve patient safety, patient outcomes, and to reduce costs associated with retained soft items, while magnetic retrieval devices, sharp detectors and computer-assisted detection systems appear to be promising tools for increasing the success of metallic RSI recovery. Conclusion The entire healthcare system is negatively impacted by a RSI event. A proactive multimodal approach that focuses on improving team communication and institutional support system, standardizing reports and implementing new technologies is the most effective way to improve the management and prevention of RSI events.

Intrapartum Basal Ganglia–Thalamic Pattern Injury and Radiologically Termed “Acute Profound Hypoxic–Ischemic Brain Injury” Are Not Synonymous

Objective Human cases of acute profound hypoxic-ischemic (HI) injury (HII), in which the insult duration timed with precision had been identified, remains rare, and there is often uncertainty of the prior state of fetal health. Study Design A retrospective analysis of 10 medicolegal cases of neonatal encephalopathy-cerebral palsy survivors who sustained intrapartum HI basal ganglia-thalamic (BGT) pattern injury in the absence of an obstetric sentinel event. Results Cardiotocography (CTG) admission status was reassuring in six and suspicious in four of the cases. The median time from assessment by admission CTG or auscultation to birth was 687.5 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 373.5–817.5 minutes), while the median time interval between first pathological CTG and delivery of the infant was 179 minutes (IQR: 137–199.25 minutes). The mode of delivery in the majority of infants (60%) was by unassisted vaginal birth; four were delivered by delayed caesarean section. The median (IQR) interval between the decision to perform a caesarean section and delivery was 169 minutes (range: 124–192.5 minutes). Conclusion The study shows that if a nonreassuring fetal status develops during labor and is prolonged, a BGT pattern HI injury may result, in the absence of a perinatal sentinel event. Intrapartum BGT pattern injury and radiologically termed “acute profound HI brain injury” are not necessarily synonymous. A visualized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) pattern should preferably solely reflect the patterns description and severity, rather than a causative mechanism of injury. Key Points